NCT05969132

Brief Summary

The goal of this randomized controlled clinical study is to compare Fully digital to conventional guided Gingivectomy procedure in management of excessive gingival display caused by altered passive eruption type 1A. The main question it aims to answer is: Does the fully digital guided gingivectomy approach able to introduce a more precise, accuracy and reliability technique with more patient satisfaction compared to the conventional guided method?

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
18

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 22, 2023

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 1, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 16, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

July 22, 2023

Last Update Submit

August 14, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

gummy smileexcessive gingival displayAltered Passive Eruptiongingivectomyfully digital guided

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Accuracy of both guides

    Intraoral digital scanning for obtaining gingival contour will be made immediately postsurgical, 4 weeks and 2 months after surgery and exported in STL files format. Diagnostic waxing-up on poured cast (for group 2) will be digitalized with a model scanner and exported in STL file format. Accuracy will be evaluated by: * Superimposing postoperative intraoral digital scanning STL files with virtually designed diagnostic waxing STL file (for group 1) and obtain matching differences in height of gingival margin in relation to Muco-gingival junction. * Superimposing postoperative intraoral digital scanning STL files with digitized waxing-up STL file (for group 2) and obtain matching differences in height of gingival margin in relation to Muco-gingival junction.

    Immediately postsurgical, 4 weeks and 2 months after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient Satisfaction

    2 months

Study Arms (2)

Digital workflow-based Protocol

EXPERIMENTAL

Fully digital guided gingivectomy procedure

Procedure: Fully digital guided gingivectomy procedure

Mock-up workflow-based Protocol

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Convectional guided gingivectomy procedure

Procedure: Convectional guided gingivectomy procedure

Interventions

1. Full history with clinical and radiographic examination (CBCT) to aid in patient's selection. 2. Supra- and sub-gingival debridement. 3. Oral hygiene instructions (OHI) 4. Presurgical intraoral scanning using an intraoral scanner (IOS) 5. Fabrication of the Gingivectomy guide: * Convert (DICOM) file to STL file then merged to STL file corresponding oral soft tissues 3D data obtained by IOS using software of surgical planning. * Digital waxing up with new desired positions of gingival margins and zenith points performed. * Designing Gingivectomy guide then exported to a 3D printer and mill a transparent resin gingivectomy guide. 6. Surgical Procedure: anesthetized the patient using local anesthesia, Surgical incision using 15c blade following CEJ anatomy will be made at each tooth using the Gingivectomy guide as reference to new gingival level and being careful to preserve the gingival papillae without involving the palatal surfaces. 7. Postoperative care

Digital workflow-based Protocol

1. Full history with clinical and radiographic examination (CBCT) to aid in patient's selection. 2. Supra- and sub-gingival debridement with OHI 3. Gingivectomy guide fabrication: * Impressions and casts obtained. * Waxing-up included new positions of gingival margins and zenith points. * Silicone index with condensation silicone impression materials made with pressure on the cast to reproduce the details of the wax, then filled after setting with resin material and placed in the patient's mouth. * Resin mock-up trimmed with blade to define the correct new gingival level. * After the patient accept the mock-up design will used as Gingivectomy guide. 4. Surgical Procedure: anesthetized the patient using local anesthesia, Surgical incision using 15c blade following CEJ anatomy will be made at each tooth using the Gingivectomy guide as reference to new gingival level and being careful to preserve the gingival papillae without involving the palatal surfaces. 5. Postoperative care

Mock-up workflow-based Protocol

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients complaining of Excessive gingival display (3mm or more gingival display at full smiling)
  • Patients classified as Altered Passive Eruption Type 1A

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients need restorative or orthodontic correction.
  • Pregnant and lactating females.
  • Heavy smoker ≥ 10 cigarettes/day.
  • Poor oral hygiene.
  • Patients with systemic diseases which could influence the outcome of the therapy e.g.
  • (Diabetic patients).
  • Heavy smoker ≥ 10 cigarettes/day.
  • Vulnerable groups of patients e.g. (prisoners, handicapped patients and decisionally impaired individuals)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Fentistry Ain Shams university

Cairo, 11566, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (28)

  • Ahmed WM, Hans A, Verhaeghe TV, Nguyen C. Managing Excessive Gingival Display Using a Digital Workflow. J Prosthodont. 2020 Jun;29(5):443-447. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13181. Epub 2020 May 6.

    PMID: 32321195BACKGROUND
  • Arias DM, Trushkowsky RD, Brea LM, David SB. Treatment of the Patient with Gummy Smile in Conjunction with Digital Smile Approach. Dent Clin North Am. 2015 Jul;59(3):703-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2015.03.007.

    PMID: 26140976BACKGROUND
  • Armitage GC. Development of a classification system for periodontal diseases and conditions. Ann Periodontol. 1999 Dec;4(1):1-6. doi: 10.1902/annals.1999.4.1.1.

    PMID: 10863370BACKGROUND
  • Bensimon GC. Surgical crown-lengthening procedure to enhance esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999 Aug;19(4):332-41.

    PMID: 10709500BACKGROUND
  • Coslet JG, Vanarsdall R, Weisgold A. Diagnosis and classification of delayed passive eruption of the dentogingival junction in the adult. Alpha Omegan. 1977 Dec;70(3):24-8. No abstract available.

    PMID: 276255BACKGROUND
  • Davarpanah M, Jansen CE, Vidjak FM, Etienne D, Kebir M, Martinez H. Restorative and periodontal considerations of short clinical crowns. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998 Oct;18(5):424-33.

    PMID: 10093519BACKGROUND
  • De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 May;36(5):428-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01398.x.

    PMID: 19419444BACKGROUND
  • Dolt AH 3rd, Robbins JW. Altered passive eruption: an etiology of short clinical crowns. Quintessence Int. 1997 Jun;28(6):363-72.

    PMID: 9477899BACKGROUND
  • Dym H, Pierre R 2nd. Diagnosis and Treatment Approaches to a "Gummy Smile". Dent Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;64(2):341-349. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Jan 24.

    PMID: 32111273BACKGROUND
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.

    PMID: 17695343BACKGROUND
  • Garber DA, Salama MA. The aesthetic smile: diagnosis and treatment. Periodontol 2000. 1996 Jun;11:18-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1996.tb00179.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 9567953BACKGROUND
  • Garcia B, Larrazabal C, Penarrocha M, Penarrocha M. Pain and swelling in periapical surgery. A literature update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008 Nov 1;13(11):E726-9.

    PMID: 18978715BACKGROUND
  • Geevarghese A, Baskaradoss JK, Alsalem M, Aldahash A, Alfayez W, Alduhaimi T, Alehaideb A, Alsammahi O. Perception of general dentists and laypersons towards altered smile aesthetics. J Orthod Sci. 2019 Aug 8;8:14. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_103_18. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31497573BACKGROUND
  • Goldman, H.M. & Cohen, D.W. (1968). Periodontal Therapy. 4ed. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Company.

    BACKGROUND
  • Gurrea J, Bruguera A. Wax-up and mock-up. A guide for anterior periodontal and restorative treatments. Int J Esthet Dent. 2014 Summer;9(2):146-62.

    PMID: 24765624BACKGROUND
  • Herrero F, Scott JB, Maropis PS, Yukna RA. Clinical comparison of desired versus actual amount of surgical crown lengthening. J Periodontol. 1995 Jul;66(7):568-71. doi: 10.1902/jop.1995.66.7.568.

    PMID: 7562348BACKGROUND
  • Hejazin, N., Wehbe, C., Wierup, M., Montilla, D.E. & Al-Mashni, L. (2020). Diagnosis and treatment modalities of altered passive eruption: Review and a case report of gummy smile. J Case Rep Images Dent, 6:100034Z07NH2020.

    BACKGROUND
  • Landry, R.G., Turnbull, R.S., & Howley, T. (1988). Effectiveness of benzydamine HCl in the treatment of periodontal post-surgical patients. Res Clin Forum. 10. 105-118.

    BACKGROUND
  • Levine RA. Forced eruption in the esthetic zone. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1997 Aug;18(8):795-803; quiz 804.

    PMID: 9533338BACKGROUND
  • Liu X, Yu J, Zhou J, Tan J. A digitally guided dual technique for both gingival and bone resection during crown lengthening surgery. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Mar;119(3):345-349. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.018. Epub 2017 Jul 8.

    PMID: 28689907BACKGROUND
  • Patil AS, Ranganath V, Yerawadekar SA, Kumar CN, Sarode GS. Pink Esthetics: A Study on Significant Gingival Parameters. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Feb 1;21(2):207-210.

    PMID: 32381829BACKGROUND
  • Pavone AF, Ghassemian M, Verardi S. Gummy Smile and Short Tooth Syndrome--Part 1: Etiopathogenesis, Classification, and Diagnostic Guidelines. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2016 Feb;37(2):102-7; quiz 108-10.

    PMID: 26905089BACKGROUND
  • Perakis N, Cocconi R. The decision-making process in interdisciplinary treatment: digital versus conventional approach. A case presentation. Int J Esthet Dent. 2019;14(2):212-224.

    PMID: 31062001BACKGROUND
  • Ruhmann, N.L., Borrasca, C., Araújo, C, A., & Pfau, E.A. (2014). Aesthetic rehabilitation of the "gummy smile" associated to virtual planning with "digital smile design"-DSD. J Surg Clin Dent, 1(1):5-9

    BACKGROUND
  • Simon H, Magne P. Clinically based diagnostic wax-up for optimal esthetics: the diagnostic mock-up. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2008 May;36(5):355-62.

    PMID: 18557126BACKGROUND
  • Trushkowsky R, Arias DM, David S. Digital Smile Design concept delineates the final potential result of crown lengthening and porcelain veneers to correct a gummy smile. Int J Esthet Dent. 2016 Autumn;11(3):338-54.

    PMID: 27433549BACKGROUND
  • Vercruyssen M, Cox C, Coucke W, Naert I, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Jul;41(7):717-23. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12231. Epub 2014 Apr 10.

    PMID: 24460748BACKGROUND
  • Wessel JR, Tatakis DN. Patient outcomes following subepithelial connective tissue graft and free gingival graft procedures. J Periodontol. 2008 Mar;79(3):425-30. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070325.

    PMID: 18315424BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Ahmed E. Amr, Ass. Prof.

    Faculty of dentistry Ain Shams University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Eslam O. Hashem, Master st.

CONTACT

Doaa A. Khattab, Ass. Prof.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The current investigation will be a single-blinded clinical trial. Blinding included the assessor, and the statistician. Its impossible for the operator who performed the surgical procedure to be blinded as the interventions will be completely different and the patient also.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Master Student

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2023

First Posted

August 1, 2023

Study Start

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion

October 1, 2024

Study Completion

November 1, 2024

Last Updated

August 16, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-08

Locations