NCT04219436

Brief Summary

Gummy smile is one of the major esthetic problems nowadays; it is due to several causes that either dental or skeletal. Etiology of the gummy smile is altered passive eruption, vertical maxillary excess, different gingival enlargement conditions, deficient maxillary lip length and excessive maxillary lip mobility, dento alveolar extrusion, combination of all these factors. Altered passive eruption is considered to be one of the most major causes, it is classified into two types according to the location of the mucogingival junction with respect to the bone crest and each type has two subtypes . Esthetic crown lengthening is the treatment of choice for subtype B in both types as bone removal is mandatory to create a space for the biological width. Most of the studies stated that there is some degree of relapse of the gingival tissues after the procedures in the follow ups, that relapse was related to the biotype of the gingival tissues, the flap placement close or far from the bone can be correlated to the suturing technique used for closure of the tissues. In the investigator's study comparing of two different suturing technique was done to evaluated their effect on gingival tissue relapse, 30 patients (26 females and 4 males) were divided between 2 groups each group consisted of 15 patients. In the first group periosteal suturing technique was done in the second figure of eight (modified interrupted) suturing technique was. Evaluation of the tissue relapse was done through the assessment of the amount of the attached gingival tissues level of gingival margin and marginal tissue contour before and after the surgery. The results of the study showed that tissue relapse was more in the periosteal suturing technique group that was related to the pressure on the tissues due to the fixation of the suture at the periostium, the papillary tissue also showed more inflammation in the follow up period prior to suture removal. The figure of eight group showed less relapse and tissue inflammation as it prevents flap edge overlap and is tension free therefore better blood supply to the tissue. Patients were generally satisfied post-surgical with their smile, gingival tissue visibility and teeth dimensions inspite of the relapse but it was better than prior to surgery. Also they would recommend it to other patients complaining from the same problem.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2017

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2017

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2018

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 30, 2019

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 7, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

January 13, 2025

Status Verified

January 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

December 30, 2019

Last Update Submit

January 9, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

esthetic crown lengtheningsuturing techniquevertical mattress suturing techniquefigure of eight suturing techniquetissue reboundsupracrestal gingival tissuefree gingival margin

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • evaluation of the marginal soft tissue levels rebound

    determination of soft tissue rebound: is measured as the difference between (the level of free gingival margin after suturing) and (the level of the free gingival margin 6 months post surgical) both measured from fixed reference point on the stent to the free gingival margin

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Supracrestal gingival tissue

    6 months

  • Patient satisfaction

    at 6 months post surgical

Study Arms (2)

vertical mattress suturing technique

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

vertical mattress suturing technique is done to close the flap

Procedure: vertical mattress suturing technique

figure of eight suturing technique

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

figure of eight suturing technique is done to close the flap

Procedure: figure of eight suturing technique

Interventions

vertical mattress suturing technique used for flap closure after esthetic crown lengthening

vertical mattress suturing technique

figure of eight suturing technique used for flap closure after esthetic crown lengthening

figure of eight suturing technique

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients complaining from gummy smile (altered passive eruption)
  • Bone level is 2 mm or less from the cemento enamel junction
  • Teeth included were free from any periodontal destruction
  • Good compliance with the plaque control instructions following initial therapy.
  • Availability for follow up and maintenance program

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of systemic diseases which could influence the outcome of the therapy (American society of anesthesiologists I, ASA I).
  • Patient suffering from periodontitis stage 4 grade c.
  • Presence of smoking habit.
  • Presence of occlusion interference.
  • Pregnant females and lactating females. .
  • Vulnerable groups of patients (handicapped, mentally retarded, prisoners).
  • Restored teeth.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty of Dentistry Ain Shams University

Cairo, Egypt

Location

Study Officials

  • ahmed gamal, professor

    faculty of dentistry ain shams university

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The study consisted of two groups the number of patient was determined by sample size calculation through G power analysis (15 patients). Patients were randomly selected using computer generated randomization (www.randomizer.org).
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 2 arms undergoing the same surgical procedure but with different suturing techniques for flap closure
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
teaching assisatnt

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 30, 2019

First Posted

January 7, 2020

Study Start

June 1, 2017

Primary Completion

June 1, 2018

Study Completion

November 1, 2019

Last Updated

January 13, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

when the study is done the results will be published with the protocol

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
the data will be available starting next month and for 1 year
Access Criteria
the keywords esthetic crown lengthening, suturing techniques in dentistry

Locations