NCT05968716

Brief Summary

The purpose of this pilot study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a social needs screening and intervention protocol in the pediatric inpatient setting by conducting a pilot trial on a pediatric ward. The investigators' hypothesis is that it will be feasible and acceptable to implement a social needs screening and intervention protocol. The investigators will work with pediatric word healthcare team members to develop a social needs screening and intervention protocol. They will then compare preliminary health and social outcome measures between children hospitalized during the pre-intervention period (control group) vs. the post-intervention period (intervention group).

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
6mo left

Started Nov 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress84%
Nov 2023Oct 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 13, 2023

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 1, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 8, 2023

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2026

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2026

Last Updated

April 13, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

July 13, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 7, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Feasibility of protocol implementation

    Feasibility of developing and implementing a social needs screening and intervention - measured dichotomously (yes/no) whether the protocol was developed and implemented within 6 months

    6 months after first meeting of protocol committee

  • Acceptability of social needs screening

    Caregiver acceptability will be assessed using baseline surveys administered during inpatient recruitment in the pre-/ and post-protocol implementation periods. Care team member acceptability will be assessed using surveys administered after protocol implementation - Likert scale derived from De Marchis et al.'s 2019 paper: Do you think it is appropriate to be asked questions about your social and economic needs during your child's hospitalization? a) Very appropriate b) Somewhat appropriate c) Neither appropriate nor inappropriate d) Somewhat inappropriate e) Very inappropriate

    Up to 6 months post baseline data collection

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Recruitment rate

    Up to 12 months after first meeting of protocol committee

  • Retention retention rate

    Up to 15 months after first meeting of protocol committee

  • Social needs screening rate

    Up to 12 months after first meeting of protocol committee

  • Caregiver-care team relationships

    Up to 15 months after first meeting of protocol committee

  • Family social needs

    Up to 15 months after first meeting of protocol committee

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Control (pre-implementation) arm

NO INTERVENTION

Caregivers recruited from the pediatric hospital ward before the social needs screening and intervention protocol is implemented will compose the "control" group or pre-implementation group.

Intervention (post-implementation) arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Caregivers recruited from the pediatric hospital ward after the social needs screening and intervention protocol is implemented will compose the "intervention" group or post-implementation group.

Other: Social needs screening protocol

Interventions

Pediatric hospital ward stakeholders will develop and implement a social needs screening protocol designed to screen families of hospitalized children for social risk factors and then provide resources to address their social needs. The intervention will consist of the protocol that is developed and implemented.

Intervention (post-implementation) arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Caregiver's child is hospitalized in the Transitional Care Unit (TCU) of Benioff Children's Hospital - San Francisco
  • English or Spanish Speaking
  • Parent/caregiver accompanying a patient hospitalized 0-17 years old
  • Consenting adult over or equal to 18 years old
  • Initially admitted to the TCU
  • Caregiver's child is part of a service for which pediatric residents or advance practice providers provide care

You may not qualify if:

  • Non-English or non-Spanish speaking caregiver
  • Caregiver under age 18
  • Family participated in study previously
  • Caregiver's child was initially admitted to a unit besides the TCU
  • Caregiver's child is NOT part of a service for which pediatric residents or advance practice providers provide care

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Benioff Children's Hospital - San Francisco

San Francisco, California, 94158, United States

Location

Related Publications (17)

  • Gottlieb LM, Adler NE, Wing H, Velazquez D, Keeton V, Romero A, Hernandez M, Munoz Vera A, Urrutia Caceres E, Arevalo C, Herrera P, Bernal Suarez M, Hessler D. Effects of In-Person Assistance vs Personalized Written Resources About Social Services on Household Social Risks and Child and Caregiver Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200701. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0701.

    PMID: 32154888BACKGROUND
  • De Marchis EH, Hessler D, Fichtenberg C, Adler N, Byhoff E, Cohen AJ, Doran KM, Ettinger de Cuba S, Fleegler EW, Lewis CC, Lindau ST, Tung EL, Huebschmann AG, Prather AA, Raven M, Gavin N, Jepson S, Johnson W, Ochoa E Jr, Olson AL, Sandel M, Sheward RS, Gottlieb LM. Part I: A Quantitative Study of Social Risk Screening Acceptability in Patients and Caregivers. Am J Prev Med. 2019 Dec;57(6 Suppl 1):S25-S37. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.010.

    PMID: 31753277BACKGROUND
  • Gottlieb LM, Hessler D, Long D, Laves E, Burns AR, Amaya A, Sweeney P, Schudel C, Adler NE. Effects of Social Needs Screening and In-Person Service Navigation on Child Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Nov 7;170(11):e162521. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.2521. Epub 2016 Nov 7.

    PMID: 27599265BACKGROUND
  • University of California, San Francisco Learning & Organization Development Employee Engagement. "Gallup Engagement Survey." Last accessed online on 10/8/2020: https://devlearning.ucsf.edu/gallup

    BACKGROUND
  • Gold R, Bunce A, Cottrell E, Marino M, Middendorf M, Cowburn S, Wright D, Mossman N, Dambrun K, Powell BJ, Gruss I, Gottlieb L, Dearing M, Scott J, Yosuf N, Krancari M. Study protocol: a pragmatic, stepped-wedge trial of tailored support for implementing social determinants of health documentation/action in community health centers, with realist evaluation. Implement Sci. 2019 Jan 28;14(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0855-9.

    PMID: 30691480BACKGROUND
  • Schickedanz A, Hamity C, Rogers A, Sharp AL, Jackson A. Clinician Experiences and Attitudes Regarding Screening for Social Determinants of Health in a Large Integrated Health System. Med Care. 2019 Jun;57 Suppl 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 6 2):S197-S201. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001051.

    PMID: 31095061BACKGROUND
  • Pantell MS, Kaiser SV, Torres JM, Gottlieb LM, Adler NE. Associations Between Social Factor Documentation and Hospital Length of Stay and Readmission Among Children. Hosp Pediatr. 2020 Jan;10(1):12-19. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2019-0123.

    PMID: 31888952BACKGROUND
  • Glick AF, Tomopoulos S, Fierman AH, Trasande L. Disparities in Mortality and Morbidity in Pediatric Asthma Hospitalizations, 2007 to 2011. Acad Pediatr. 2016 Jul;16(5):430-437. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2015.12.014. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

    PMID: 26768727BACKGROUND
  • Kaiser SV, Bakel LA, Okumura MJ, Auerbach AD, Rosenthal J, Cabana MD. Risk Factors for Prolonged Length of Stay or Complications During Pediatric Respiratory Hospitalizations. Hosp Pediatr. 2015 Sep;5(9):461-73. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2014-0246.

    PMID: 26330245BACKGROUND
  • Boyle CA, Decoufle P, Yeargin-Allsopp M. Prevalence and health impact of developmental disabilities in US children. Pediatrics. 1994 Mar;93(3):399-403.

    PMID: 7509480BACKGROUND
  • Dell SD, Parkin PC, Macarthur C. Childhood asthma admissions: determinants of short stay. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2001 Dec;12(6):327-30. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3038.2001.0s079.x.

    PMID: 11846870BACKGROUND
  • Carroll CL, Uygungil B, Zucker AR, Schramm CM. Identifying an at-risk population of children with recurrent near-fatal asthma exacerbations. J Asthma. 2010 May;47(4):460-4. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2010.481344.

    PMID: 20528602BACKGROUND
  • Macy ML, Stanley RM, Sasson C, Gebremariam A, Davis MM. High turnover stays for pediatric asthma in the United States: analysis of the 2006 Kids' Inpatient Database. Med Care. 2010 Sep;48(9):827-33. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f2595e.

    PMID: 20706158BACKGROUND
  • Lin HC, Kao S, Wen HC, Wu CS, Chung CL. Length of stay and costs for asthma patients by hospital characteristics--a five-year population-based analysis. J Asthma. 2005 Sep;42(7):537-42. doi: 10.1080/02770900500214783.

    PMID: 16169785BACKGROUND
  • Srivastava R, Homer CJ. Length of stay for common pediatric conditions: teaching versus nonteaching hospitals. Pediatrics. 2003 Aug;112(2):278-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.2.278.

    PMID: 12897273BACKGROUND
  • Alderwick H, Gottlieb LM. Meanings and Misunderstandings: A Social Determinants of Health Lexicon for Health Care Systems. Milbank Q. 2019 Jun;97(2):407-419. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12390. Epub 2019 May 8.

    PMID: 31069864BACKGROUND
  • Beck AF, Cohen AJ, Colvin JD, Fichtenberg CM, Fleegler EW, Garg A, Gottlieb LM, Pantell MS, Sandel MT, Schickedanz A, Kahn RS. Perspectives from the Society for Pediatric Research: interventions targeting social needs in pediatric clinical care. Pediatr Res. 2018 Jul;84(1):10-21. doi: 10.1038/s41390-018-0012-1. Epub 2018 May 23.

    PMID: 29795202BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patient Acceptance of Health Care

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Treatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Matthew S Pantell, MD, MS

    University of California, San Francisco

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: The investigators will utilize a before-and-after trial design, whereby the "control group" consists of caregivers studied before a social needs screening protocol is implemented on a pediatric hospital ward, and the "intervention group" consists of caregivers studied after a social needs screening protocol is implemented on a pediatric hospital ward.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2023

First Posted

August 1, 2023

Study Start

November 8, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2026

Last Updated

April 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

As this is a pilot trial to examine the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a larger trial: 1) the study sample will be small and the investigators do not want to increase the risk of participant identification; 2) the pilot will not be powered enough to answer research questions related to outcomes for which other researchers might want to examine the data.

Locations