Magnesium Versus Prochlorperazine Versus Metoclopramide for Migraines
MAGraine
A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of the Effects of Magnesium Compared to Conventional Therapy on Acute Migraine
1 other identifier
interventional
157
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This investigation describes a proposed clinical trial that will evaluate the relative efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulfate for the treatment of migraine compared to intravenous metoclopramide (Reglan) and intravenous prochlorperazine (Compazine) in the treatment of acute headache and migraine in adult patients. The ultimate objective will be clinical application of these drugs in the emergency department for the treatment of acute headache and migraine. The two phenothiazines (metoclopramide and prochlorperazine) have been routinely utilized in the treatment of acute headache and migraine in the emergency department setting. Per the 2017 American Headache Society guidelines, both intravenous metoclopramide and intravenous procholorperazine are recommended as "clinicians should offer" agents with level B evidence. Of note, there are no agents with level A evidence purported by this guideline for acute management of migraine. The same guideline offers "no recommendation can be made regarding the role of intravenous magnesium for adults who present to the ED with acute migraine. However intravenous magnesium may be of benefit to patients who present with migraine with aura." Multiple trials have evaluated intravenous magnesium's safety and efficacy in the management of acute migraine. These have demonstrated the tolerability of intravenous magnesium on a with breadth of patients. Most commonly the primary adverse event was flushing which self-resolved. No cases of hypotension were reported. None of these study agents have been withdrawn from the market.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Aug 2019
Typical duration for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 9, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 6, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 1, 2024
CompletedOctober 8, 2024
September 1, 2024
7 months
January 9, 2020
January 31, 2024
October 2, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
30 Minute Pain Score
Scores range from 0-10. A higher score, denotes more pain
30 minutes after initiation
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Length of Stay
From time of arrival to time of discharge.
Need for Rescue Analgesia
From time of arrival to time of discharge.
Study Arms (3)
Magnesium
EXPERIMENTALMagnesium Sulfate 2gm in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes
Metoclopramide
ACTIVE COMPARATORMetoclopramide 10mg in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes
Prochlorperazine
ACTIVE COMPARATORProchlorperazine in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes
Interventions
Prochlorperazine 10mg in 50ml D5W over 20 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18 years or older
- Able to provide informed consent
- Primary diagnosis of headache or migraine
- Between October 1, 2018 to April 1, 2020
- Presenting to Advocate Christ Medical Center emergency department and meet clinical assessment per physician
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy defined as a positive urine HCG
- Stated history of renal impairment
- Allergy or sensitivity to any study drugs
- Concomitant treatment at the time of study drug administered in the emergency department
- Patients with a history of this study participation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Advocate Christ Medical Center
Oak Lawn, Illinois, 60453, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Marc McDowell
- Organization
- Advocate Christ Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Cirone, MD
advocate christ medical center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 9, 2020
First Posted
August 1, 2023
Study Start
August 23, 2019
Primary Completion
March 31, 2020
Study Completion
April 6, 2023
Last Updated
October 8, 2024
Results First Posted
October 1, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share