NCT05962554

Brief Summary

The current study aims to test the efficacy of iJobs, an online intervention for the unemployed. iJobs is an online adaptation of the JOBS program.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
176

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 6, 2023

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 19, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 27, 2023

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 2, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 2, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 2, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

June 19, 2023

Last Update Submit

March 26, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

iJobs

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Participants' self-efficacy regarding the job search process

    The Job Search Self-Efficacy Scale (20-item) measures participants' perception of their ability to gain employment. The minimum score is 20 and the maximum is 100. A higher score means a better outcome (increased job search self-efficacy).

    Change from baseline to post-intervention and follow-up (approximately 2 weeks and 6 weeks)

  • Participants' job search intensity and effort

    The investigators will use a version of Blau's Job-search behaviors scale adapted to the contemporary context and Romanian population. The scale measures participants' involvement in job search activities in terms of frequency and intensity. The minimum score is 16 and the maximum is 80. A higher score means a better outcome (increased job search behavior effort).

    Change from baseline to post-intervention and follow-up (approximately 2 weeks and 6 weeks)

  • The quality of participants' job search behaviors

    The Job search quality scale has 20 items and measures the quality in which the job search behaviors are performed. The minimum score is 20 and the maximum is 100. A higher score means a better outcome (increased job search quality).

    Change from baseline to post-intervention and follow-up (approximately 2 weeks and 6 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Participants' ability to deal with setbacks in the job search process

    Change from baseline to post-intervention (approximately 2 weeks)

  • Participants' overall self-esteem

    Change from baseline to post-intervention (approximately 2 weeks)

  • Participants' anxiety regarding their future career

    Change from baseline to post-intervention (approximately 2 weeks)

  • Generalised Anxiety symptoms

    Change from baseline to post-intervention (approximately 2 weeks)

  • Depression symptoms

    Change from baseline to post-intervention (approximately 2 weeks)

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (7)

  • Physical health

    Baseline only

  • Treatment adherence

    Post-intervention only (approximately 2 weeks)

  • Satisfaction with the intervention

    Post-intervention only (approximately 2 weeks)

  • +4 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

The group that will be first randomly allocated to iJobs.

Behavioral: iJobs

Waiting list control group

EXPERIMENTAL

This group will receive the intervention 2-weeks after the intervention group finishes it.

Behavioral: iJobs

Interventions

iJobsBEHAVIORAL

iJobs is a 2-week intervention consisting of 5 modules focusing on discovering job skills, job search strategies, preparing effective resumes, exercising different types of interviews, and overcoming setbacks in the job search process. This is an adaptation of the JOBS program.

Intervention groupWaiting list control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Unemployed and looking for a job
  • Work as volunteers and are looking for a paid job
  • Have a PC or laptop and basic digital competencies

You may not qualify if:

  • They don't have internet access and are not available during the two weeks of the program

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

West University of Timisoara

Timișoara, 300223, Romania

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Bangor, A., Kortum, P. & Miller, J. (2009). Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies, 4(3), 114-123.

    BACKGROUND
  • Bodnaru, A., Rusu, A., Blonk, R., Vîrgă, D., Iliescu, D., & Van den Broeck, A. (2023, May 4). Bodnaru_et_al_preprint. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tdseq

    BACKGROUND
  • Blau, G. (1994). Testing a two-dimensional measure of job search behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 288-312. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1994.1061

    BACKGROUND
  • Curran, J., Wishart, P., & Gingrich, J. (1999). JOBS: A manual for teaching people successful job search strategies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, Michigan Prevention Research Center.

    BACKGROUND
  • Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.

    PMID: 11556941BACKGROUND
  • Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the Self. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    BACKGROUND
  • Saks, A.M., Zikic, J., & Koen, J. (2015). Job search self-efficacy: Reconceptualizing the construct and its measurement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 86, 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.11.007

    BACKGROUND
  • Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.

    PMID: 16717171BACKGROUND
  • Tsai C.T., Hsu H., Hsu Y.C. (2017). Tourism and hospitality college students' career anxiety: Scale development and validation. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 29(4), 158-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2017.1382365

    BACKGROUND
  • Van Hooft, E.A.J., Van Hoye, G., & Van den Hee, S.M. (2022). How to Optimize the Job Search Process: Development and Validation of the Job Search Quality Scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 30(3), 474-505. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727211052812

    BACKGROUND
  • Virga D, De Witte H, Cifre E. The Role of Perceived Employability, Core Self-Evaluations, and Job Resources on Health and Turnover Intentions. J Psychol. 2017 Oct 3;151(7):632-645. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2017.1372346. Epub 2017 Oct 6.

    PMID: 28985167BACKGROUND
  • Vîrga, D. & Rusu, A. (2018). Core self-evaluations, job search behaviour and health complaints. The mediating role of job search self-efficacy. Career Development International, 23(3), 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2017-0208

    BACKGROUND
  • Vuori, J., & Vinokur, A.D. (2005). Job-search preparedness as a mediator of the effects of the Tyohon Job Search Intervention on re-employment and mental health. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(3), 275-291. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.308

    BACKGROUND
  • Lorenz T, Beer C, Putz J, Heinitz K. Measuring Psychological Capital: Construction and Validation of the Compound PsyCap Scale (CPC-12). PLoS One. 2016 Apr 1;11(4):e0152892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152892. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27035437BACKGROUND
  • Berwick DM, Murphy JM, Goldman PA, Ware JE Jr, Barsky AJ, Weinstein MC. Performance of a five-item mental health screening test. Med Care. 1991 Feb;29(2):169-76. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199102000-00008.

    PMID: 1994148BACKGROUND
  • Bodnaru A, Rusu A, Virga D, Van den Broeck A, Blonk RWB, Tranca LM, Iliescu D. Efficacy of the iJobs Web-Based Psychoeducational Intervention to Improve Job Search Behavior and Promote Mental Health Among Unemployed People: Protocol for a Waitlist Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 May 8;13:e55374. doi: 10.2196/55374.

Study Officials

  • Andrei Rusu

    West University of Timisoara

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The two independent groups (intervention vs. waiting list control group) will be crossed with three measurement times (i.e., baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up). Hence, the design will be a 2 (intervention vs. control) X 3 (baseline, post-intervention, and 1-month follow-up) factorial design.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 19, 2023

First Posted

July 27, 2023

Study Start

June 6, 2023

Primary Completion

October 2, 2024

Study Completion

November 2, 2024

Last Updated

April 2, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations