Palonosetron vs Ondansetron In PONV Prophylaxis Among Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients
PONV
A Comparison Between Palonosetron And Ondansetron As Prophylaxis Against Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting In Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: A Randomised Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
92
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of two antiemetic drugs, palonosetron and ondansetron, when given alongside dexamethasone as a preventive measure against early and delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adult and adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). The main questions the study aims to answer are:
- How effective is palonosetron compared to ondansetron, both combined with dexamethasone, in preventing PONV after scoliosis surgery?
- Are there any differences in the need for rescue antiemetics, occurrence of adverse effects related to the study drugs, and patient satisfaction between the two treatment groups? Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to receive either palonosetron or ondansetron in addition to dexamethasone as part of their anesthesia and antiemetic regimen. The incidence and/ or severity of nausea, vomiting and retching will be assessed at 1 hour, 4 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jun 2023
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 21, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 24, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 2, 2024
CompletedDecember 10, 2024
December 1, 2024
10 months
May 21, 2023
December 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Incidence of PONV
To compare the effectiveness of palonosetron and ondansetron when administered alongside dexamethasone as prophylaxis against early and delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adult and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery under total intravenous anaesthesia.
At 1 hour after surgery
Incidence of PONV
To compare the effectiveness of palonosetron and ondansetron when administered alongside dexamethasone as prophylaxis against early and delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adult and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery under total intravenous anaesthesia.
At 4 hours after surgery
Incidence of PONV
To compare the effectiveness of palonosetron and ondansetron when administered alongside dexamethasone as prophylaxis against early and delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adult and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery under total intravenous anaesthesia.
At 12 hours after surgery
Incidence of PONV
To compare the effectiveness of palonosetron and ondansetron when administered alongside dexamethasone as prophylaxis against early and delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adult and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery under total intravenous anaesthesia.
At 24 hours after surgery
Incidence of PONV
To compare the effectiveness of palonosetron and ondansetron when administered alongside dexamethasone as prophylaxis against early and delayed postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adult and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery under total intravenous anaesthesia.
At 48 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of Participants Developing Postoperative Nausea Vomiting Requiring Rescue Antiemetic Within 48 hours After Surgery
At 1 hour, 4 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after surgery
Number of Participants Developing Adverse Effects Related to the Study Drugs.
Overall, assessed at 48 hours after surgery
Degree of patient satisfaction as represented on the Visual Analogue Scale
Overall, assessed at 48 hours after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Group A
EXPERIMENTALGroup A will receive a stat dose of IV palonosetron 1.5mcg/kg prior to commencement of general anaesthesia.
Group B
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup B will receive a stat dose of IV ondansetron 0.15mg/kg at the start of wound closure.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age of 10 years and above
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I-II Physical Status
You may not qualify if:
- History of allergy to serotonin receptor antagonists or dexamethasone
- Obesity with a body mass index (BMI) of 34 and above
- Body weight of less than 30kg
- Active smoker
- History of gastroesophageal reflux disease/ other gastrointestinal diseases associated with vomiting
- History of motion sickness
- History of nausea or vomiting within 24 hours before the surgery
- Administration of antiemetics/ steroids/ psychoactive medications within 24 hours before the surgery
- Require mechanical ventilation postoperatively
- History of cardiac arrhythmias
- Prolonged QT (QTc is prolonged if \> 440ms in men or \> 460ms in women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Malaya
Pantai Valley, Kuala Lumpur, 59100, Malaysia
Related Publications (18)
Kumar A, Solanki SL, Gangakhedkar GR, Shylasree TS, Sharma KS. Comparison of palonosetron and dexamethasone with ondansetron and dexamethasone for postoperative nausea and vomiting in postchemotherapy ovarian cancer surgeries requiring opioid-based patient-controlled analgesia: A randomised, double-blind, active controlled study. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Oct;62(10):773-779. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_437_18.
PMID: 30443060BACKGROUNDKotiniemi LH, Ryhanen PT, Valanne J, Jokela R, Mustonen A, Poukkula E. Postoperative symptoms at home following day-case surgery in children: a multicentre survey of 551 children. Anaesthesia. 1997 Oct;52(10):963-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.203-az0338.x.
PMID: 9370838BACKGROUNDVilleret I, Laffon M, Duchalais A, Blond MH, Lecuyer AI, Mercier C. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in paediatric ambulatory surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002 Oct;12(8):712-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00952.x.
PMID: 12472709BACKGROUNDPatel RI, Hannallah RS. Anesthetic complications following pediatric ambulatory surgery: a 3-yr study. Anesthesiology. 1988 Dec;69(6):1009-12. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198812000-00044. No abstract available.
PMID: 3195743BACKGROUNDRowley MP, Brown TC. Postoperative vomiting in children. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1982 Nov;10(4):309-13. doi: 10.1177/0310057X8201000402.
PMID: 7158749BACKGROUNDAwad IT, Moore M, Rushe C, Elburki A, O'Brien K, Warde D. Unplanned hospital admission in children undergoing day-case surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 May;21(5):379-83. doi: 10.1017/s0265021504005058.
PMID: 15141796BACKGROUNDKovac AL. Update on the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Drugs. 2013 Sep;73(14):1525-47. doi: 10.1007/s40265-013-0110-7.
PMID: 24057415BACKGROUNDDolin SJ, Cashman JN, Bland JM. Effectiveness of acute postoperative pain management: I. Evidence from published data. Br J Anaesth. 2002 Sep;89(3):409-23.
PMID: 12402719BACKGROUNDGolembiewski J, Chernin E, Chopra T. Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005 Jun 15;62(12):1247-60; quiz 1261-2. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/62.12.1247.
PMID: 15947124BACKGROUNDKovac AL. Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Drugs. 2000 Feb;59(2):213-43. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059020-00005.
PMID: 10730546BACKGROUNDApfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, Greim CA, Roewer N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology. 1999 Sep;91(3):693-700. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199909000-00022.
PMID: 10485781BACKGROUNDApfel CC, Kranke P, Eberhart LH, Roos A, Roewer N. Comparison of predictive models for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth. 2002 Feb;88(2):234-40. doi: 10.1093/bja/88.2.234.
PMID: 11883387BACKGROUNDGan TJ, Belani KG, Bergese S, Chung F, Diemunsch P, Habib AS, Jin Z, Kovac AL, Meyer TA, Urman RD, Apfel CC, Ayad S, Beagley L, Candiotti K, Englesakis M, Hedrick TL, Kranke P, Lee S, Lipman D, Minkowitz HS, Morton J, Philip BK. Fourth Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2020 Aug;131(2):411-448. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004833.
PMID: 32467512BACKGROUNDEberhart LHJ, Geldner G, Kranke P, Morin AM, Schauffelen A, Treiber H, Wulf H. The development and validation of a risk score to predict the probability of postoperative vomiting in pediatric patients. Anesth Analg. 2004 Dec;99(6):1630-1637. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000135639.57715.6C.
PMID: 15562045BACKGROUNDPalmer GM, Pirakalathanan P, Skinner AV. A multi-centre multi-national survey of anaesthetists regarding the range of anaesthetic and surgical practices for paediatric scoliosis surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 Nov;38(6):1077-84. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1003800619.
PMID: 21226441BACKGROUNDHo CM, Wu HL, Ho ST, Wang JJ. Dexamethasone prevents postoperative nausea and vomiting: benefit versus risk. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2011 Sep;49(3):100-4. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2011.06.002.
PMID: 21982171BACKGROUNDWakamiya R, Seki H, Ideno S, Ihara N, Minoshima R, Watanabe K, Sato Y, Morisaki H. Effects of prophylactic dexamethasone on postoperative nausea and vomiting in scoliosis correction surgery: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 14;9(1):2119. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38764-8.
PMID: 30765809BACKGROUNDKloth DD. New pharmacologic findings for the treatment of PONV and PDNV. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Jan 1;66(1 Suppl 1):S11-8. doi: 10.2146/ashp080462.
PMID: 19106333BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Siti Nadzrah Binti Yunus, MAnaes, MBBS
Universiti Malaya
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 21, 2023
First Posted
July 24, 2023
Study Start
June 1, 2023
Primary Completion
March 20, 2024
Study Completion
May 2, 2024
Last Updated
December 10, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share