NCT05956860

Brief Summary

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of R.A.V.I.(radial access for abdominopelvic vascular intervention), and evaluate the feasibility and safety of repeated radial artery intervention

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
1,143

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2023

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 11, 2023

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 21, 2023

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 7, 2023

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 21, 2023

Status Verified

December 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

July 11, 2023

Last Update Submit

December 14, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Radial access, abdominopelvic vascular intervention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Technical success rate: radial artery puncture success rate and procedure success rate

    1)The definition of successful puncture: the radial artery sheath is inserted into the radial artery; 1. The definition of successful puncture: the radial artery sheath was inserted into the radial artery; 2. The definition of successful procedure: the catheter was inserted into the target blood vessel via the radial artery, the target procedures was completed, and no crossover to other approach;

    up to 1 day after surgery

  • Puncture success rate and procedure success rate of repeated radial artery intervention

    Repeat radial artery intervention: two or more procedures in the same patient with ipsilateral radial artery intervention.

    up to 1 day after surgery

  • Complications related to radial approach

    a) Minor complications: such as radial artery pulse weakening or disappearance without evidence of distal ischemia, local hematoma\* formation or bleeding without blood transfusion or surgical intervention, radial artery spasm\*, etc. i. Asymptomatic or mild symptoms, no treatment, no sequelae; ii. Minor treatment, including overnight observation only, without sequelae; b) Major complication: Such as the need for blood transfusion, limb ischemia, pseudoaneurysm\*, any complications requiring surgical intervention, etc. i. Short-term hospitalization (\<48 hours) ii. Unexpected level of care escalation, prolonged hospital stay(\>48 hours) iii. Permanent damage; iv. Die;

    up to 1 month after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Radial artery puncture and sheath insertion time;

    up to 1 day after surgery

Other Outcomes (5)

  • The time of successfully intubation of angiographic catheter;

    up to 1 day after surgery

  • Access site crossover rate

    up to 1 day after surgery

  • Hemostasis time at the puncture site;

    up to 1 day after surgery

  • +2 more other outcomes

Study Arms (1)

radial access for abdominopelvic vascular intervention

abdominopelvic vascular intervention through the radial artery access

Procedure: abdominopelvic vascular intervention through the radial artery access

Interventions

According to the pathological changes and needs of the subjects (any abdominal and pelvic arterial intervention that can be performed through the radial artery access, including but not limited to: 1. hepatic intervention, such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), etc.; 2. Other visceral intervention, such as spleen, kidney, mesentery, etc.; 3. Pelvic intervention, such as uterine artery embolism, prostatic artery embolism, etc.; 4. Others, such as preoperative embolization of bone tumors (lumbar, sacral vertebra), etc.

radial access for abdominopelvic vascular intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

According to the pathological changes and needs of the subjects (any abdominal and pelvic arterial intervention that can be performed through the radial artery access, including but not limited to: 1. hepatic intervention, such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), etc.; 2. Other visceral intervention, such as spleen, kidney, mesentery, etc.; 3. Pelvic intervention, such as uterine artery embolism, prostatic artery embolism, etc.; 4. Others, such as preoperative embolization of bone tumors (lumbar, sacral vertebra), etc.

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥18 years old, gender is not limited;
  • Patients who need abdominopelvic transarterial interventions
  • Preoperative ultrasound assessment of radial artery diameter ≥2mm;
  • Those with good radial pulse and normal Barbeau test (non-D wave);
  • There was no infection, redness swelling or ulceration near the puncture site;
  • Patients and(or) family members agreed to participate in the clinical study and signed informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Has a history of severe allergy or intolerance to contrast media or chemotherapy drugs;
  • Absence or occlusion of the radial artery pulse;
  • Need large sheath (≥6Fr);
  • Previous history of stroke;
  • Patients with chronic kidney disease who need to establish dialysis access or preserve upper limb blood vessels in the future;
  • Previous history of interventional procedure through radial artery approach (re-intervention of enrolled patients is not included);
  • The investigator believes that the aortic calcification is severe. and the risk of plaque detachment is existed;
  • Patients and(or) family members do not agree to join the clinical trials and sign the informed consent ;
  • According to the investigator's judgment, there are other conditions that are not suitable for participating in this clinical study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Zhongda Hospital Southeast University

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

RECRUITING

Study Officials

  • Gao-Jun Teng, MD

    Zhongda Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
President

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2023

First Posted

July 21, 2023

Study Start

August 7, 2023

Primary Completion

December 30, 2024

Study Completion

December 30, 2025

Last Updated

December 21, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-12

Locations