Midline Catheters Versus Peripheral Catheters in Internal Medicine Unit
Análisis de la utilización de Los catéteres Intravenosos periféricos de Linea Media Frente a Los catéteres Intravenosos periféricos Convencionales en el Servicio de Medicina Interna
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study aims to evaluate the rate of complications and the duration of cannulation of a midline intravenous catheter compared to a short peripheral catheter in patients hospitalized in an Internal Medicine service of a Spanish hospital.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 18, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 23, 2022
CompletedAugust 23, 2022
August 1, 2022
2 months
August 18, 2022
August 20, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Length of canalization
Days of catheter stay
Four weeks
Number of punctures
Number of times a catheter is inserted
Four weeks
Phlebitis
Presence of catheter related phlebitis
Four weeks
Study Arms (2)
Midline Catheter
EXPERIMENTALMidline catheter insertion
Peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC)
NO INTERVENTIONPeripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patients included were those who were hospitalized in the Internal Medicine Service of the Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia who needed intravenous therapy and who had signed the Informed Consent for placement of a midline at the time of the change of the PIVC placed in the emergency unit.
You may not qualify if:
- Those with a forecast hospitalization of less than one week, those who were receiving palliative or symptomatic treatment, those who were carriers of a CVC or those who had presented difficulty in venous access with midline after two consecutive attempts were excluded
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, 46014, Spain
Related Publications (13)
Millington SJ, Hendin A, Shiloh AL, Koenig S. Better With Ultrasound: Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion. Chest. 2020 Feb;157(2):369-375. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.04.139. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
PMID: 31654617BACKGROUNDPrasanna N, Yamane D, Haridasa N, Davison D, Sparks A, Hawkins K. Safety and efficacy of vasopressor administration through midline catheters. J Crit Care. 2021 Feb;61:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.09.024. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
PMID: 33049486BACKGROUNDNickel B. Does the Midline Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Have a Place in Critical Care? Crit Care Nurse. 2021 Dec 1;41(6):e1-e21. doi: 10.4037/ccn2021818.
PMID: 34851379BACKGROUNDMoureau N, Chopra V. Indications for peripheral, midline and central catheters: summary of the MAGIC recommendations. Br J Nurs. 2016 Apr 28-May 11;25(8):S15-24. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.8.S15.
PMID: 27126759BACKGROUNDSkaggs MKD, Daniels JF, Hodge AJ, DeCamp VL. Using the Evidence-Based Practice Service Nursing Bundle to Increase Patient Satisfaction. J Emerg Nurs. 2018 Jan;44(1):37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
PMID: 29167032BACKGROUNDMohn-Brown E. Implementing Quality and Safety Education for Nurses in Postclinical Conferences: Transforming the Design of Clinical Nursing Education. Nurse Educ. 2017 Sep/Oct;42(5S Suppl 1):S18-S21. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000410.
PMID: 28832457BACKGROUNDJohansen H, Helgesen AK. Palliative care in the community - the role of the resource nurse, a qualitative study. BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Oct 14;20(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00860-w.
PMID: 34645424BACKGROUNDSelby LM, Rupp ME, Cawcutt KA. Prevention of Central-Line Associated Bloodstream Infections: 2021 Update. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2021 Dec;35(4):841-856. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2021.07.004.
PMID: 34752222BACKGROUNDPanepinto R, Harris J, Wellette J. A Review of Best Practices Related to Intravenous Line Management for Nurses. Nurs Clin North Am. 2021 Sep;56(3):389-399. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2021.05.001.
PMID: 34366159BACKGROUNDTimsit JF, Baleine J, Bernard L, Calvino-Gunther S, Darmon M, Dellamonica J, Desruennes E, Leone M, Lepape A, Leroy O, Lucet JC, Merchaoui Z, Mimoz O, Misset B, Parienti JJ, Quenot JP, Roch A, Schmidt M, Slama M, Souweine B, Zahar JR, Zingg W, Bodet-Contentin L, Maxime V. Expert consensus-based clinical practice guidelines management of intravascular catheters in the intensive care unit. Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Sep 7;10(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00713-4.
PMID: 32894389BACKGROUNDFarina J, Cornistein W, Balasini C, Chuluyan J, Blanco M. [Central venous catheter related infections. Inter-Societies update and recommendations]. Medicina (B Aires). 2019;79(1):53-60. Spanish.
PMID: 30694189BACKGROUNDScoppettuolo G, Pittiruti M, Pitoni S, Dolcetti L, Emoli A, Mitidieri A, Migliorini I, Annetta MG. Ultrasound-guided "short" midline catheters for difficult venous access in the emergency department: a retrospective analysis. Int J Emerg Med. 2016 Dec;9(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12245-016-0100-0. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
PMID: 26847572BACKGROUNDVillalba-Nicolau M, Chover-Sierra E, Saus-Ortega C, Ballestar-Tarin ML, Chover-Sierra P, Martinez-Sabater A. Usefulness of Midline Catheters versus Peripheral Venous Catheters in an Inpatient Unit: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. Nurs Rep. 2022 Oct 31;12(4):814-823. doi: 10.3390/nursrep12040079.
PMID: 36412798DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Neither care providers nor patients could be masked because the intravenous device is different and it's easy to identify the one we are using. Outcomes assessor only works with anonymized data
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 18, 2022
First Posted
August 23, 2022
Study Start
February 1, 2017
Primary Completion
April 1, 2017
Study Completion
September 30, 2017
Last Updated
August 23, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share