Immediate Implant Placement Using Immediate Dentoalveolar Restoration Versus Ice Cream Cone Technique With Labial Plate Dehiscence
Evaluation of Soft and Hard Tissue Changes Following Immediate Implant Using Immediate Dentoalveolar Restoration Versus Ice Cream Cone Technique In Cases With Labial Plate Dehiscence: A 1-Year Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
28
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
: Evaluation of Soft and Hard Tissue Changes following Immediate Implant using Immediate Dentoalveolar Restoration Versus Ice Cream Cone technique for management of Cases With Labial Plate Dehiscence
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 7, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2025
CompletedSeptember 7, 2023
September 1, 2023
2.1 years
July 7, 2023
September 3, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Bucco/facial-palatal ridge thickness
Impressions were taken with addition silicone before tooth extraction, after six months of implant placement (immediately after the placement of the definite crown) and 12 months after crown installation. Casts were then obtained with special gypsum stone type IV.Casts were measured by a dentist not involved in the study with a digital caliper. Three reference points were measured from the free gingival margin to the apex at the implant site and in the contralateral tooth: 1 mm, 3 mm and 6 mm
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Radiographic bucco-palatal bone changes
1 year
3. Radiographic width of bone labial to the implant
1 year
Radiographic vertical bone changes
1 year
Esthetic evaluation (The pink esthetic score)
1 year
Implant stability
6 months
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group Immediate Dentoalveolar Restoration
EXPERIMENTAL* After applying anesthesia to the maxillary tuberosity, a full thickness crestal incision was made following the distal contour of the maxillary right second molar. This incision was followed by a palatal release incision to access the donor area. * The flap was raised in the tuberosity area Then, the bone graft was harvested from the underlying bone by using a 1 cm wide flat chisel and a surgical hammer. * The corticocancellous graft was manipulated using a rongeur to reproduce the shape of the peri-implant bone defect. * The graft was carefully inserted to the level of the implant platform Finally, a screw-retained resin provisional crown, relined over a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) anti-rotation abutment, was placed out of occlusion, establishing the ideal emergence profile to accommodate the soft tissues and to promote a thicker and more stable gingival tissue margin
Control group Ice cream cone technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORIce cream cone technique 1. Resorbable collagen membrane will be cut confirming to the size and shape of the defect of labial bone plate dehiscence. The membrane will be placed against internal surface of the extraction socket against the remaining buccal plate of bone. 2. The gap between the collagen membrane and the implant fixture will be filled with xenograft particulates. The membrane will be folded in palatal direction to seal the socket in an ice cream cone shape, then will be secured using resorbable sutures to prevent dislodgment of the blood clot and bone grafting material
Interventions
Topical anesthesia will be administered using an infiltration technique. • Atraumatic extraction will be done with the aid of periotome and Luxators. • The extraction socket will be debrided to remove any residual debris or granulation tissue. •. Socket walls will be checked using a periodontal probe to ensure integrity of all sockets walls except the labial bone plate which must show a dehiscence. • Implant placement will be done according to manufactures' instructions; drills will be used sequentially in a more palatal direction leaving a buccal jumping gap of at least 2mm. All implants will engage at least 3 mm apical to the apical end of the socket with adequate primary stability
Topical anesthesia will be administered using an infiltration technique. • Atraumatic extraction will be done with the aid of periotome and Luxators. • The extraction socket will be debrided to remove any residual debris or granulation tissue. •. Socket walls will be checked using a periodontal probe to ensure integrity of all sockets walls except the labial bone plate which must show a dehiscence. • Implant placement will be done according to manufactures' instructions; drills will be used sequentially in a more palatal direction leaving a buccal jumping gap of at least 2mm. All implants will engage at least 3 mm apical to the apical end of the socket with adequate primary stability
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Non-restorable teeth in the esthetic zone with a defect of labial bone.
- Teeth with no acute inflammation.
- Patients are free from any systemic condition that may affect the healing.
- Availability of bone apical and palatal to the socket to provide primary stability
- Good oral health.
- Willingness to sign the informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Heavy smoker (\> 10 cigarettes/day)
- Pregnant females
- Contraindication for Implant surgery.
- Patients with poor oral hygiene.
- Acute inflammation in the site of implantation and adjacent tissue.
- A history of radiotherapy in the head or neck region.
- Patients with systemic diseases like uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, coagulation disorders, alcohol or drug abuse not suitable for implantation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Aya Sharaflead
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dentist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 7, 2023
First Posted
July 14, 2023
Study Start
October 1, 2023
Primary Completion
October 30, 2025
Study Completion
December 30, 2025
Last Updated
September 7, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09