Aggression From the Perspective of Patients and Nurses
1 other identifier
interventional
97
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The research, was planned in a randomized controlled design, aiming to evaluate the effect of the training given to nurses working in psychiatric clinics on the use of aggression and BVC (Broset Violence Checklist) on the nurses' perceptions of aggression and the compliance of the use of BVC, which they evaluated for the patients watched in the videos, with the BVC determined by expert opinion. The study was conducted in Adana Doctor Ekrem Tok Mental Health and Diseases Hospital between July 2021 and April 2022. A total of 97 nurses working in psychiatric clinics, 47 in the training group and 50 in the comparison group, participated in the study. A pre-test was administered to the nurses and nurses in the training group were randomized and given training including aggression and BVC use. After the training, a post-test was administered to all nurses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 14, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 23, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2023
CompletedJuly 14, 2023
July 1, 2023
9 days
June 23, 2023
July 13, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Perception of Aggression Scale
The scale has a 5-point Likert-type rating system ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) and consists of 29 items. The items have two subscales: functional (functional - acceptable / healthy response) and dysfunctional (dysfunctional - unacceptable / undesirable aggression). For each subscale, the average of the relevant item scores will be calculated.
Procedure (one week before the training)
Broset Violence Checklist
A score of "1" is given in the presence of each item of the BVC, and "0" in the absence of it. In the next evaluations of the patient, if there is an increase in the relevant item compared to the previous one, the behavior score is scored as "1", the habitual or same level behavior is considered absent and scored as "0". If there is no more in the case of a patient with a flood than before, the relevant item score should be "0". If an increase in the level of exuberance is observed, it should be scored as "1". After the six items are scored in this way, the evaluation is made over the total score. A total score of "0" indicates that the patient has a low severity risk level. "1- 2 points" indicates moderate risk of violence and necessitates measures to prevent violence. "3-6 points" refers to a high risk of violence.
Procedure (one week before the training and one day after the training)
Perception of Aggression Scale
The scale has a 5-point Likert-type rating system ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5) and consists of 29 items. The items have two subscales: functional (functional - acceptable / healthy response) and dysfunctional (dysfunctional - unacceptable / undesirable aggression). For each subscale, the average of the relevant item scores will be calculated.
Procedure (one day after the training)
Broset Violence Checklist
A score of "1" is given in the presence of each item of the BVC, and "0" in the absence of it. In the next evaluations of the patient, if there is an increase in the relevant item compared to the previous one, the behavior score is scored as "1", the habitual or same level behavior is considered absent and scored as "0". If there is no more in the case of a patient with a flood than before, the relevant item score should be "0". If an increase in the level of exuberance is observed, it should be scored as "1". After the six items are scored in this way, the evaluation is made over the total score. A total score of "0" indicates that the patient has a low severity risk level. "1- 2 points" indicates moderate risk of violence and necessitates measures to prevent violence. "3-6 points" refers to a high risk of violence.
Procedure (one day after the training)
Study Arms (2)
Taining group
EXPERIMENTALNurses in the training group were given training on aggression and the use of BVC.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONNurses in the control group were not trained, till the study ends.
Interventions
After obtaining verbal consent from the nurses who met the inclusion criteria of the study before the pre-test was applied to the nurses, the nurses who volunteered to participate in the study were randomized within their own clinic using the simple randomization method. For this, after the data collection form was distributed before the pre-test, the nurses were asked to write the letter that came to them on the data collection form and not forget it. In order for nurses to be included in the training or comparison group, the letter A, written on the closed papers in the box prepared for simple randomization, represents the Education group, and the letter B represents the comparison group.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Volunteering to participate in the research,
- To have been working in the hospital where the research was conducted for at least 1 year,
- To have no vision, hearing and speech problems.
You may not qualify if:
- To want to withdraw from the research at any stage of the research,
- Not completing or not being able to complete the research for any reason,
- To work in the filiation team during the research process.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Çukurova Üniversitesi
Adana, 01180, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ph.D, RN
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 23, 2023
First Posted
July 14, 2023
Study Start
July 1, 2021
Primary Completion
July 10, 2021
Study Completion
April 14, 2022
Last Updated
July 14, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share