Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Parks and Bacon Techniques in Low Rectal Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
256
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to compare the postoperative anal function of patients with ultra-low rectal cancer after Parks operation (colon anal anastomosis) and Bacon operation (colon anal pull-out anastomosis), which may provide clinical evidence for the improvement of anal function and quality of life. The main questions it aims to answer are: the difference of anal function 1 year after surgery type of study: clinical trial participant population: patients with low rectal cancer Participants will receive Parks operation of Bacon operation If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare Parks and Bacon operation to see if the anal function 1 year after surgery is different.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 28, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 8, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 8, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 8, 2027
December 18, 2025
December 1, 2025
4 years
June 28, 2023
December 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score 1 year after surgery
use a scoring system for bowel dysfunction after LAR for rectal cancer on the basis of symptoms and impact on quality of life
1 year after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (4)
LARS score at 3 months after surgery
3 months after surgery
LARS score at 6 months after surgery
6 months after surgery
Postoperative Quality of Life Score
3, 6, and 12 months after operation
The incidence of postoperative anastomotic complications
3, 6, and 12 months after operation
Study Arms (2)
Parks technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients receive coloanal anastomosis operation
Bacon technique
EXPERIMENTALpatients receive coloanal pull-out anastomosis operation
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men or women, aged between 18 and 75 years;
- Pathological diagnosis of rectal cancer before operation, with the distance from the lower edge of the tumor to the dentate line ≤ 3cm by MR imaging;
- No local complications (including complete/ incomplete obstruction, active bleeding, local invasion of sphincter or levator ani, etc.) before operation;
- Suitable for anal preservation surgery discussed by MDT;
- Adequate bone marrow, liver, renal and cardiac function meeting the requirements of surgery and anesthesia;
- R0 resection is expected technically;
- Provision of written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous history of malignant colorectal tumors;
- Complications such as obstruction and gastrointestinal bleeding that need an emergency operation;
- Unachievable R0 resection due to invasion of adjacent organs by primary tumor;
- Multiple primary tumors;
- History of other malignancy;
- Participation in other clinical trials within the previous 4 weeks of enrollment;
- ASA physical status score ≥ IV level and/or ECOG performance status ≥ 2;
- Intolerance of surgery due to liver, renal, cardiopulmonary or coagulation dysfunction, or underlying diseases;
- History of serious mental disorders;
- Women in pregnancy or lactation period;
- Uncontrolled infection before operation;
- Unsuitable to be included due to other clinical and laboratory conditions by the judgement of investigators.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yatsen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jun Huang, MD
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 28, 2023
First Posted
July 13, 2023
Study Start
August 8, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 8, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 8, 2027
Last Updated
December 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12