NCT05941403

Brief Summary

The goal of this pilot feasibility implementation trial is to assess preliminary feasibility and acceptability of a set of produce prescription implementation strategies. Produce prescription programs are one approach to addressing food insecurity, or the lack of adequate access to safe and nutritious foods. Produce prescriptions involve healthcare providers identifying patients at risk for food insecurity and writing prescriptions for those patients to receive subsidized vegetables. In this study, the investigators will work with a community advisory board to develop a set of enhanced implementation strategies (e.g., training, technical assistance) to support healthcare providers in delivering produce prescription programs. The investigators will assess the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of these strategies. Pre-post changes in implementation outcomes (i.e., adoption) and effectiveness outcomes (i.e., food security) will be examined.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
52

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2023

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 9, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 12, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 31, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

June 9, 2023

Last Update Submit

May 29, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

food insecurityimplementation scienceproduce prescription program

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (26)

  • Patient Engagement with the Produce Prescription Program Questionnaire

    Patient engagement will be measured with a 4-question biweekly questionnaire that includes items rated on a 5-point (1-5) Likert-scale related to whether patients received the produce and whether they used it and liked it. Higher scores on each item indicate higher engagement. Scores range from 4-20.

    Baseline

  • Patient Engagement with the Produce Prescription Program Questionnaire

    Patient engagement will be measured with a 4-question biweekly questionnaire that includes items rated on a 5-point (1-5) Likert-scale related to whether patients received the produce and whether they used it and liked it. Higher scores indicate higher engagement. Scores range from 4-20.

    Week 2

  • Patient Engagement with the Produce Prescription Program Questionnaire

    Patient engagement will be measured with a 4-question biweekly questionnaire that includes items rated on a 5-point (1-5) Likert-scale related to whether patients received the produce and whether they used it and liked it. Higher scores indicate higher engagement. Scores range from 4-20.

    Week 4

  • Patient Engagement with the Produce Prescription Program Questionnaire

    Patient engagement will be measured with a 4-question biweekly questionnaire that includes items rated on a 5-point (1-5) Likert-scale related to whether patients received the produce and whether they used it and liked it. Higher scores indicate higher engagement. Scores range from 4-20.

    Week 6

  • Patient Engagement with the Produce Prescription Program Questionnaire

    Patient engagement will be measured with a 4-question biweekly questionnaire that includes items rated on a 5-point (1-5) Likert-scale related to whether patients received the produce and whether they used it and liked it. Higher scores indicate higher engagement. Scores range from 4-20.

    Week 8

  • Patient Engagement with the Produce Prescription Program Questionnaire

    Patient engagement will be measured with a 4-question biweekly questionnaire that includes items rated on a 5-point (1-5) Likert-scale related to whether patients received the produce and whether they used it and liked it. Higher scores indicate higher engagement. Scores range from 4-20.

    Week 10

  • Patient Engagement with the Produce Prescription Program Questionnaire

    Patient engagement will be measured with a 4-question biweekly questionnaire that includes items rated on a 5-point (1-5) Likert-scale related to whether patients received the produce and whether they used it and liked it. Higher scores indicate higher engagement. Scores range from 4-20.

    Week 12

  • Patient Engagement with the Produce Prescription Program Questionnaire

    Patient engagement will be measured with a 4-question biweekly questionnaire that includes items rated on a 5-point (1-5) Likert-scale related to whether patients received the produce and whether they used it and liked it. Higher scores indicate higher engagement. Scores range from 4-20.

    Week 14

  • Patient Engagement with the Produce Prescription Program Questionnaire

    Patient engagement will be measured with a 4-question biweekly questionnaire that includes items rated on a 5-point (1-5) Likert-scale related to whether patients received the produce and whether they used it and liked it. Higher scores indicate higher engagement. Scores range from 4-20.

    Week 16

  • Patient Engagement with the Produce Prescription Program Questionnaire

    Patient engagement will be measured with a 4-question biweekly questionnaire that includes items rated on a 5-point (1-5) Likert-scale related to whether patients received the produce and whether they used it and liked it. Higher scores indicate higher engagement. Scores range from 4-20.

    Week 18

  • Patient Engagement with the Produce Prescription Program Questionnaire

    Patient engagement will be measured with a 4-question biweekly questionnaire that includes items rated on a 5-point (1-5) Likert-scale related to whether patients received the produce and whether they used it and liked it. Higher scores indicate higher engagement. Scores range from 4-20.

    Week 20

  • Patient Engagement with the Produce Prescription Program Questionnaire

    Patient engagement will be measured with a 4-question biweekly questionnaire that includes items rated on a 5-point (1-5) Likert-scale related to whether patients received the produce and whether they used it and liked it. Higher scores indicate higher engagement. Scores range from 4-20.

    Week 22

  • Patient Engagement with the Produce Prescription Program Questionnaire

    Patient engagement will be measured with a 4-question biweekly questionnaire that includes items rated on a 5-point (1-5) Likert-scale related to whether patients received the produce and whether they used it and liked it. Higher scores indicate higher engagement. Scores range from 4-20.

    Week 24

  • Patient Engagement with the Produce Prescription Program Questionnaire

    Patient engagement will be measured with a 4-question biweekly questionnaire that includes items rated on a 5-point (1-5) Likert-scale related to whether patients received the produce and whether they used it and liked it. Higher scores indicate higher engagement. Scores range from 4-20.

    Week 26

  • Patient Engagement with the Produce Prescription Program Questionnaire

    Patient engagement will be measured with a 4-question biweekly questionnaire that includes items rated on a 5-point (1-5) Likert-scale related to whether patients received the produce and whether they used it and liked it. Higher scores indicate higher engagement. Scores range from 4-20.

    Week 28

  • Acceptability of Intervention Measure

    Acceptability of produce prescriptions will be assessed using the 4-item Acceptability of Intervention measure with scores ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Higher scores indicate higher acceptability of the intervention. Scores range from 4-20.

    Baseline

  • Acceptability of Intervention Measure

    Acceptability of produce prescriptions will be assessed using the 4-item Acceptability of Intervention measure with scores ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Higher scores indicate higher acceptability of the intervention. Scores range from 4-20.

    6 month follow up

  • Feasibility of Intervention Measure

    Feasibility of produce prescriptions will be assessed using the 4-item Feasibility of Intervention Measure with scores ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Higher scores indicate higher feasibility of the intervention. Scores range from 4-20.

    Baseline

  • Feasibility of Intervention Measure

    Feasibility of produce prescriptions will be assessed using the 4-item Feasibility of Intervention Measure with scores ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Higher scores indicate higher feasibility of the intervention. Scores range from 4-20.

    6 month follow up

  • Intervention Appropriateness Measure

    Appropriateness of produce prescriptions will be assessed using the 4-item Intervention Appropriateness Measure with scores ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Higher scores indicate higher appropriateness of the intervention. Scores range from 4-20.

    Baseline

  • Intervention Appropriateness Measure

    Appropriateness of produce prescriptions will be assessed using the 4-item Intervention Appropriateness Measure with scores ranging from 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree). Higher scores indicate higher appropriateness of the intervention. Scores range from 4-20.

    6 month follow up

  • Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale

    The Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale measures providers' attitudes toward evidence-based practices - specifically produce prescription programs. Scores range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (to a very great extent); higher scores indicate more positive attitudes toward evidence-based practices. Scores are calculated as an average and range from 0-4.

    6-month follow up

  • Feasibility of Participant Enrollment

    Proportion of participants who agree to enroll in the study out of those who are enrolled in the produce prescription program

    Baseline

  • Implementation Climate Scale

    This measure of implementation climate will assess the innovation-specific organizational climate for implementing produce prescription programs. Responses will be rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very great extent). Higher responses indicate a stronger implementation climate. Scores are calculated as an average and range from 0-4.

    6 month follow up

  • Implementation Readiness: Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change

    This measure will assess organizations' readiness to implement a new intervention. Responses will be rated on a 5 point scale ranging from 1 (disagree) to 5 (agree). Higher scores indicate higher organizational readiness for change. Scores range from 12-60.

    Baseline

  • Implementation Readiness: Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change

    This measure will assess organizations' readiness to implement a new intervention. Responses will be rated on a 5 point scale ranging from 1 (disagree) to 5 (agree). Higher scores indicate higher organizational readiness for change. Scores range from 12-60.

    6-month follow up

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Adoption of Produce Prescriptions

    Baseline

  • Adoption of Produce Prescriptions

    6 month follow up

  • Effectiveness: Food Security

    Baseline; 6 month follow up

  • Effectiveness: Food Security

    Baseline

  • Effectiveness: Nutrition security

    6 month follow up

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Enhanced Produce Prescription Implementation

EXPERIMENTAL

The study team will develop an enhanced implementation blueprint to support uptake of the produce prescription (VeggieRx) intervention that is informed by advisory board input and includes multiple implementation strategies to address identified barriers to implementation.

Behavioral: Enhanced Produce Prescription Implementation

Interventions

Practices make modifications to their usual produce prescription program based on an implementation blueprint. While the exact implementation strategies to be added will be defined based on qualitative data (data collection in progress), possible implementation strategies may include training or technical assistance.

Enhanced Produce Prescription Implementation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years of age or older
  • healthcare provider/staff member who makes referrals to produce prescriptions (VeggieRx)
  • fluent in English and/or Spanish

You may not qualify if:

  • under age 18
  • have not been involved in referral process for produce prescriptions (VeggieRx)
  • are not fluent in English and/or Spanish
  • years of age or older
  • enrolled in the produce prescription program (VeggieRx)
  • fluent in English and/or Spanish
  • under age 18
  • declined to enroll in the produce prescription program (VeggieRx)
  • are not fluent in English and/or Spanish

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Brown Research on Implementation and Dissemination to Guide Evidence use (BRIDGE) Program

Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, United States

Location

Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences/School of Public Health

Providence, Rhode Island, 02912, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Frank HE, Guzman LE, Ayalasomayajula S, Albanese A, Dunklee B, Harvey M, Bouchard K, Vadiveloo M, Yaroch AL, Scott K, Tovar A. Developing and testing a produce prescription implementation blueprint to improve food security in a clinical setting: a pilot study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Mar 23;10(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01467-7.

    PMID: 38521931BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Hannah E Frank, PhD

    Brown University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Alison Tovar, PhD

    Brown University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2023

First Posted

July 12, 2023

Study Start

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion

November 30, 2023

Study Completion

December 31, 2023

Last Updated

May 31, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Given the small dataset, data will not be made publicly available. However, de-identified quantitative data will be made available to individual investigators following a written request to the study principal investigators.

Locations