NCT05930795

Brief Summary

There is not a study in the literature comparing laparoscopic pectopexy and laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) surgeries in the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. However, there are studies comparing the efficacy of other surgery types for pelvic organ prolapse. For example,In a study, the clinical and anatomical success rate in LLS operations was 83.8%, while the success rate in abdominal sacropexy operation was 89.2%.In another study in which pectopexy and vaginal sacro spinous fixation operations were compared, apical prolapse recurrence rates were found to be similar in both groups.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
67

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 10, 2022

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 2, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 5, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 10, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 10, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

October 1, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

June 2, 2023

Last Update Submit

September 30, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Comparison of pre and post operative assessment of POP-Q measurements

    Comparison of POP-Q values of patients undergone pectopexy and lateral suspension pre and postoperatively.

    1 year

  • Comparison of Pre and post operative assessment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse / Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire

    Units on a scale of the patients obtained with Pelvic Organ Prolapse / Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire will be compared before and after surgery. PISQ- 12 is a Likert type of survey with five options (scoring from 0 to 4) in each question and the patient is asked a total of 12 questions. The total score is calculated by summing points given to each question. A higher score means better sexual function and the highest total score is 48.

    1 year

Study Arms (2)

Patients with pelvic organ prolapse undergone pectopexy surgery

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: pectopexy

Patients with pelvic organ prolapse undergone lateral suspension surgery

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Procedure: lateral suspension

Interventions

pectopexyPROCEDURE

pectopexy: surgery performed by suspending prolapsed uterus or vault to the pectineal ligament

Also known as: surgery performed by suspending prolapsed uterus or vault to the pectineal ligament
Patients with pelvic organ prolapse undergone pectopexy surgery

lateral suspension: surgery performed by suspending prolapsed uterus or vault to the lateral walls of the abdomen corresponding to the 3 cm anterior superior to the iliac crest

Patients with pelvic organ prolapse undergone lateral suspension surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with POP Q stage 2 and above, operated for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse,
  • Being a Citizen of the Republic of Turkey over the age of 18
  • Patients operated by the same experienced surgeons

You may not qualify if:

  • To have received chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy for any reason before
  • Having previously operated for prolapse
  • Cases with Contraindications for Laparoscopy
  • Cases with severe cardiovascular or respiratory disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Gaziosmanpasa Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2023

First Posted

July 5, 2023

Study Start

August 10, 2022

Primary Completion

August 10, 2023

Study Completion

September 10, 2023

Last Updated

October 1, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-09

Locations