NCT05929027

Brief Summary

This study aims at comparing manual function outcomes between the standard of care and additional self-administered hand therapy after stroke. Strokes are common neurological injuries, and although rates of survival have increased in recent decades, survivors often continue to experience deficiencies in hand dexterity and bimanual function. Most motor recovery takes place within the first 3 months after a stroke. This initial period is necessary for stabilizing the patient but also provides different opportunities to foster motor recovery. Functional gains, including instances after the post-acute period, have been observed after regular and frequent (high dosage) therapy, suggesting that recovery is likely influenced by practice-driven sensorimotor learning. These findings motivate the implementation of daily therapeutic regimes beyond post-stroke hospitalization and basic motor function, aiming instead at addressing overlooked deficiencies in manipulation and bimanual coordination. While some hand therapy is often provided during outpatient therapy visits (the standard of care), self-administered sessions play a large role in implementing additional daily therapy. As a result, the investigators are interested in both the implementation of self-administered regimes and measuring clinical outcomes with and without self-administered therapy.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
19mo left

Started Sep 2023

Longer than P75 for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress62%
Sep 2023Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 23, 2023

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 3, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 28, 2023

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2027

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

July 18, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.7 years

First QC Date

June 23, 2023

Last Update Submit

July 17, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

strokestroke recoveryhand weaknessvideo game

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in finger dexterity as assessed by the nine-hole peg test (9PHT)

    The Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) is used to measure finger dexterity in patients with various neurological diagnoses. Participants are asked to place pegs into the holes one at a time, then remove them one at a time, and place them back in the container as fast as they can.

    Baseline, post-intervention up to 7 days, 6 months post-stroke

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in arm hand function using the Fugl Meyer Scale.

    Baseline, up to 7 days post-intervention, and 6 months post-stroke

  • Change in arm and hand function using the ARAT

    Baseline, up to 7 days post-intervention, and 6 months post-stroke

  • Change in fingertip individuation index as assessed by the Cyber Glove

    Baseline, up to 7 days post-intervention, and 6 months post-stroke

  • Change in Cognitive impairment as assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)

    Baseline, up to 7 days post-intervention, and 6 months post-stroke

  • Engagement and enjoyment of the different sub-aspects within each additional therapy approach as assessed by satisfaction surveys developed by the study team

    up to 7 days post--intervention

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Treatment Arm G1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The interventions will consist of 5 daily sessions over 3 weeks. Because the interventions are self-administered, the sessions are unsupervised in the sense that the sessions do not include synchronous therapy provided by a clinician or a therapist. Instead, during each week, the intervention will include 2 short (less than 15 minutes) telemedicine check-in appointments (not standard of care) provided by a licensed occupational therapist for the purposes of assessing safety and providing guidance for the unsupervised sessions. The intervention will focus on stretches, warm-up and strengthening exercises aimed at improving hand function.

Behavioral: occupational therapy - self directed

Treatment Arm G2

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention will consist of 5 daily sessions over 3 weeks. Because the interventions are self-administered, the sessions are unsupervised in the sense that the sessions do not include synchronous therapy provided by a clinician or a therapist. Instead, during each week, the intervention will include 2 short (less than 15 minutes) telemedicine check-in appointments (not standard of care) provided by a licensed occupational therapist for the purposes of assessing safety and providing guidance for the unsupervised sessions. In this treatment arm, participants will use a knob-like computer interface connected to a tablet. The tablet features a series of game-like tasks to be carried out by moving the interface with the fingers. The target intervention is scheduled for 1.5 hours per day, which is typically divided into two sessions of 40 minutes with a 10-minute break in between.

Behavioral: NoNo

Control Group (CG)

NO INTERVENTION

Unlike G1 and G2, the CG will remain in the standard of care treatment plan but will not receive any additional therapy. That is to say, participants will follow standard therapy plans as dictated by normal post-stroke hospital discharge planning. The only difference from the standard of care will be that participants in CG will still receive identical check-in appointments with follow-up questions concerning recovery and activities.

Interventions

NoNoBEHAVIORAL

Participants in the G2 group will use the Twirlstone (knob-like) device to play a videogame called Nono's World. The Twirlstone is an electromechanical device that resembles a knob and a standard joystick (identical to the discontinued Atari CX-20 Controller). The knob can rotate or move in a push-pull fashion. To control the game's character (an axolotl called Nono), a signal about the knob motion is relayed to the computer wirelessly. This device has been certified by Johns Hopkins University's Clinical Engineering Services, where it was deemed less than minimum risk. The game has been custom built to allow participants to take control of the character using subtle manipulative finger movements to accomplish game-like tasks. The investigators will use portable communication devices to carry out telemedicine sessions. All devices and are low-power battery-operated tools for encouraging hand movement and the components are approved for use in the commercial market.

Treatment Arm G2

Participants 5 daily sessions over 3 weeks consisting of self-administered, unsupervised occupational therpay. Additionally, participants will have 2, \<15 minutes telemedicine check-in appointments (not standard of care) provided by a licensed occupational therapist for the purposes of assessing safety and providing guidance for the unsupervised sessions. The intervention will focus on stretches, warm-up and strengthening exercises aimed at improving hand function. The investigators will use portable communication devices for the purposes of carrying out telemedicine sessions. All devices and are low-power battery-operated tools for encouraging hand movement and the components are approved for use in the commercial market.

Treatment Arm G1

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 21 years and over
  • Stroke confirmed by CT or MRI within the previous 6 weeks.
  • Arm and/or hand impairment induced by the stroke.
  • Meet JSTTEP criteria and are enrolled in JSTTEP.
  • Admitted to the Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) inpatient stroke service.
  • Proficient in speaking and reading English.
  • Willing and capable to contacted remotely for all necessary telemedicine contacts.
  • No history of prior ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with associated motor deficits (prior stroke with no upper limb motor symptoms is allowed)
  • Ability to give informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Arm impairment that is too severe (FM-UE \< 40) on day of baseline testing prior to beginning of the study.
  • Recent Botox injection to upper limb (since stroke onset).
  • History of physical or neurological condition that interferes with study procedures or assessment of motor function (e.g. severe arthritis, severe neuropathy, Parkinson's disease).
  • Terminal illness with life expectancy \< 6 months.
  • Inability to sit in a chair and perform hand exercises for 20 minutes at the time.
  • Cognitive impairment, with score on Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ≤ 20.
  • Social and/or personal circumstances that prevent telemedicine follow-up.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Johns Hopkin

Baltimore, Maryland, 21287-6953, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (35)

  • Johansson GM, Hager CK. A modified standardized nine hole peg test for valid and reliable kinematic assessment of dexterity post-stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Jan 14;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0479-y.

    PMID: 30642350BACKGROUND
  • Bejot Y, Daubail B, Giroud M. Epidemiology of stroke and transient ischemic attacks: Current knowledge and perspectives. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2016 Jan;172(1):59-68. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Dec 21.

    PMID: 26718592BACKGROUND
  • Heron M. Deaths: Leading Causes for 2019. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2021 Jul;70(9):1-114.

    PMID: 34520342BACKGROUND
  • Brunnstrom S. Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia: based on sequential recovery stages. Phys Ther. 1966 Apr;46(4):357-75. doi: 10.1093/ptj/46.4.357. No abstract available.

    PMID: 5907254BACKGROUND
  • Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Apr;75(4):394-8. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90161-9.

    PMID: 8172497BACKGROUND
  • Kotila M, Waltimo O, Niemi ML, Laaksonen R, Lempinen M. The profile of recovery from stroke and factors influencing outcome. Stroke. 1984 Nov-Dec;15(6):1039-44. doi: 10.1161/01.str.15.6.1039.

    PMID: 6506115BACKGROUND
  • Colebatch JG, Gandevia SC. The distribution of muscular weakness in upper motor neuron lesions affecting the arm. Brain. 1989 Jun;112 ( Pt 3):749-63. doi: 10.1093/brain/112.3.749.

    PMID: 2731028BACKGROUND
  • Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1969 Jun;50(6):311-9. No abstract available.

    PMID: 5788487BACKGROUND
  • Barry AJ, Triandafilou KM, Stoykov ME, Bansal N, Roth EJ, Kamper DG. Survivors of Chronic Stroke Experience Continued Impairment of Dexterity But Not Strength in the Nonparetic Upper Limb. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jul;101(7):1170-1175. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.01.018. Epub 2020 Feb 28.

    PMID: 32113974BACKGROUND
  • Krakauer JW, Kitago T, Goldsmith J, Ahmad O, Roy P, Stein J, Bishop L, Casey K, Valladares B, Harran MD, Cortes JC, Forrence A, Xu J, DeLuzio S, Held JP, Schwarz A, Steiner L, Widmer M, Jordan K, Ludwig D, Moore M, Barbera M, Vora I, Stockley R, Celnik P, Zeiler S, Branscheidt M, Kwakkel G, Luft AR. Comparing a Novel Neuroanimation Experience to Conventional Therapy for High-Dose Intensive Upper-Limb Training in Subacute Stroke: The SMARTS2 Randomized Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021 May;35(5):393-405. doi: 10.1177/15459683211000730. Epub 2021 Mar 20.

    PMID: 33745372BACKGROUND
  • Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 Dec;10(12):861-72. doi: 10.1038/nrn2735. Epub 2009 Nov 4.

    PMID: 19888284BACKGROUND
  • Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, Deruyter F, Eng JJ, Fisher B, Harvey RL, Lang CE, MacKay-Lyons M, Ottenbacher KJ, Pugh S, Reeves MJ, Richards LG, Stiers W, Zorowitz RD; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016 Jun;47(6):e98-e169. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000098. Epub 2016 May 4.

    PMID: 27145936BACKGROUND
  • BENNETT EL, DIAMOND MC, KRECH D, ROSENZWEIG MR. CHEMICAL AND ANATOMICAL PLASTICITY BRAIN. Science. 1964 Oct 30;146(3644):610-9. doi: 10.1126/science.146.3644.610. No abstract available.

    PMID: 14191699BACKGROUND
  • McDonald MW, Hayward KS, Rosbergen ICM, Jeffers MS, Corbett D. Is Environmental Enrichment Ready for Clinical Application in Human Post-stroke Rehabilitation? Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Jul 11;12:135. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00135. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 30050416BACKGROUND
  • Vive S, Af Geijerstam JL, Kuhn HG, Bunketorp-Kall L. Enriched, Task-Specific Therapy in the Chronic Phase After Stroke: An Exploratory Study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020 Apr;44(2):145-155. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000309.

    PMID: 32118616BACKGROUND
  • Platz T. Impairment-oriented training (IOT)--scientific concept and evidence-based treatment strategies. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22(3-5):301-15.

    PMID: 15502273BACKGROUND
  • Platz T, Lotze M. Arm Ability Training (AAT) Promotes Dexterity Recovery After a Stroke-a Review of Its Design, Clinical Effectiveness, and the Neurobiology of the Actions. Front Neurol. 2018 Dec 11;9:1082. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01082. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 30619042BACKGROUND
  • Krakauer JW, Cortes JC. A non-task-oriented approach based on high-dose playful movement exploration for rehabilitation of the upper limb early after stroke: A proposal. NeuroRehabilitation. 2018;43(1):31-40. doi: 10.3233/NRE-172411.

    PMID: 30056438BACKGROUND
  • Schieber MH, Santello M. Hand function: peripheral and central constraints on performance. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Jun;96(6):2293-300. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01063.2003.

    PMID: 15133016BACKGROUND
  • Elliott JM, Connolly KJ. A classification of manipulative hand movements. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1984 Jun;26(3):283-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1984.tb04445.x.

    PMID: 6734945BACKGROUND
  • Xu J, Ejaz N, Hertler B, Branscheidt M, Widmer M, Faria AV, Harran MD, Cortes JC, Kim N, Celnik PA, Kitago T, Luft AR, Krakauer JW, Diedrichsen J. Separable systems for recovery of finger strength and control after stroke. J Neurophysiol. 2017 Aug 1;118(2):1151-1163. doi: 10.1152/jn.00123.2017. Epub 2017 May 31.

    PMID: 28566461BACKGROUND
  • Raghavan P, Santello M, Gordon AM, Krakauer JW. Compensatory motor control after stroke: an alternative joint strategy for object-dependent shaping of hand posture. J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jun;103(6):3034-43. doi: 10.1152/jn.00936.2009. Epub 2010 Mar 24.

    PMID: 20457866BACKGROUND
  • Patel P, Kaingade SR, Wilcox A, Lodha N. Force control predicts fine motor dexterity in high-functioning stroke survivors. Neurosci Lett. 2020 Jun 11;729:135015. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135015. Epub 2020 Apr 30.

    PMID: 32360934BACKGROUND
  • Karni A, Meyer G, Rey-Hipolito C, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turner R, Ungerleider LG. The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):861-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.861.

    PMID: 9448252BACKGROUND
  • Cramer SC, Dodakian L, Le V, See J, Augsburger R, McKenzie A, Zhou RJ, Chiu NL, Heckhausen J, Cassidy JM, Scacchi W, Smith MT, Barrett AM, Knutson J, Edwards D, Putrino D, Agrawal K, Ngo K, Roth EJ, Tirschwell DL, Woodbury ML, Zafonte R, Zhao W, Spilker J, Wolf SL, Broderick JP, Janis S; National Institutes of Health StrokeNet Telerehab Investigators. Efficacy of Home-Based Telerehabilitation vs In-Clinic Therapy for Adults After Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Sep 1;76(9):1079-1087. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1604.

    PMID: 31233135BACKGROUND
  • Raglio A, Panigazzi M, Colombo R, Tramontano M, Iosa M, Mastrogiacomo S, Baiardi P, Molteni D, Baldissarro E, Imbriani C, Imarisio C, Eretti L, Hamedani M, Pistarini C, Imbriani M, Mancardi GL, Caltagirone C. Hand rehabilitation with sonification techniques in the subacute stage of stroke. Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 31;11(1):7237. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86627-y.

    PMID: 33790343BACKGROUND
  • Unibaso-Markaida I, Iraurgi I, Ortiz-Marques N, Amayra I, Martinez-Rodriguez S. Effect of the Wii Sports Resort on the improvement in attention, processing speed and working memory in moderate stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Feb 28;16(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0500-5.

    PMID: 30819204BACKGROUND
  • Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31.

    PMID: 1135616BACKGROUND
  • Tariq SH, Tumosa N, Chibnall JT, Perry MH 3rd, Morley JE. Comparison of the Saint Louis University mental status examination and the mini-mental state examination for detecting dementia and mild neurocognitive disorder--a pilot study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;14(11):900-10. doi: 10.1097/01.JGP.0000221510.33817.86.

    PMID: 17068312BACKGROUND
  • Reuben DB, Magasi S, McCreath HE, Bohannon RW, Wang YC, Bubela DJ, Rymer WZ, Beaumont J, Rine RM, Lai JS, Gershon RC. Motor assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology. 2013 Mar 12;80(11 Suppl 3):S65-75. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872e01.

    PMID: 23479547BACKGROUND
  • Wilson PH, Rogers JM, Vogel K, Steenbergen B, McGuckian TB, Duckworth J. Home-based (virtual) rehabilitation improves motor and cognitive function for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial of the Elements (EDNA-22) system. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Nov 25;18(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00956-7.

    PMID: 34823545BACKGROUND
  • Beebe JA, Lang CE. Relationships and responsiveness of six upper extremity function tests during the first six months of recovery after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009 Jun;33(2):96-103. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181a33638.

    PMID: 19556918BACKGROUND
  • Schneider EJ, Ada L, Lannin NA. Extra upper limb practice after stroke: a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Dec 30;5:156. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0531-5. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 31893129BACKGROUND
  • Heshmatollah A, Dommershuijsen LJ, Fani L, Koudstaal PJ, Ikram MA, Ikram MK. Long-term trajectories of decline in cognition and daily functioning before and after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;92(11):1158-1163. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326043. Epub 2021 Jul 6.

    PMID: 34230107BACKGROUND
  • Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, Sunderland A, Hewer RL, Ward E. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;50(6):714-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.50.6.714.

    PMID: 3612152BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Steven R Zeiler, M.D, Ph.D.

    Johns Hopkins University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Steven R. Zeiler, M.D., Ph.D.

CONTACT

Arnold Gomez, Ph.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2023

First Posted

July 3, 2023

Study Start

September 28, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

July 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations