Changing Tactics? Optimizing ECT in Difficult-to-treat Depression
ChaT
1 other identifier
interventional
196
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to address which treatment strategy (continue right unilateral (RUL) ECT or switch to bitemporal (BT) ECT speeds up recovery and has the least impact on memory function, in case of early non-response during an acute course of ECT for difficult-to-treat depression. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Assess the antidepressant efficacy and cognitive impact of the continuation of an ongoing treatment with RUL ECT compared to switching the treatment technique to BT ECT, in patients failing to show an early response to an acute course of ECT for major depression;
- Assess group and subject-specific trajectories of depressive symptom severity and neurocognitive performance during the acute ECT course and up to 3 months post-treatment. Participants treated with ECT for depression, showing no 'response' (≥50 percent decrease in depressive symptom severity compared to baseline) after 4 treatment sessions, will be randomized to either switch to BT ECT or continue with RUL ECT. Mood and neurocognitive assessments will be performed at baseline, after 4 ECT sessions (before randomization), after 8 ECT sessions, at the end of the acute course and 3 month after the acute course.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable depression
Started Jun 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable depression
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
July 1, 2024
June 1, 2024
3 years
June 1, 2023
June 28, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Change form baseline Depressive Symptom Severity
mean scores on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-CR)
after 4 ECT sessions (2 weeks)
Change form baseline Depressive Symptom Severity
mean scores on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-CR)
after 8 ECT sessions (4 weeks)
Depressive Symptom Severity
mean scores on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-CR)
at the end of acute ECT course (up to 7 weeks)
Depressive Symptom Severity
mean scores on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Rated (IDS-CR)
3 months post-acute course
Autobiographical Memory
Mean scores on the Colombia University Autobiographical Memory Interview Short Form (CU-AMI-SF)
after 4 ECT sessions (2 weeks)
Autobiographical Memory
Mean scores on the Colombia University Autobiographical Memory Interview Short Form (CU-AMI-SF)
after 8 ECT sessions (4 weeks)
Autobiographical Memory
Mean scores on the Colombia University Autobiographical Memory Interview Short Form (CU-AMI-SF)
at the end of acute ECT course (up to 7 weeks)
Autobiographical Memory
Mean scores on the Colombia University Autobiographical Memory Interview Short Form (CU-AMI-SF)
3 months post-acute course
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Response/remission status
at the end of acute ECT course (up to 7 weeks)
number of ECT treatments needed to achieve response/remission
at the end of acute ECT course (up to 7 weeks)
Neurocognitive performance (RAVLT)
after 4 ECT sessions (2 weeks), after 8 ECT sessions (4 weeks), at the end of acute ECT course (up to 7 weeks), 3 months post-acute course
Neurocognitive performance (MoCA)
after 4 ECT sessions (2 weeks), after 8 ECT sessions (4 weeks), at the end of acute ECT course (up to 7 weeks), 3 months post-acute course
Neurocognitive performance (COWAT)
after 4 ECT sessions (2 weeks), after 8 ECT sessions (4 weeks), at the end of acute ECT course (up to 7 weeks), 3 months post-acute course
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Clinical characteristics (CORE)
after 4 ECT sessions (2 weeks), after 8 ECT sessions (4 weeks), at the end of acute ECT course (up to 7 weeks), 3 months post-acute course
Clinical characteristics (PDAS)
after 4 ECT sessions (2 weeks), after 8 ECT sessions (4 weeks), at the end of acute ECT course (up to 7 weeks), 3 months post-acute course
Study Arms (2)
BT ECT
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants showing no response will be switched to BT ECT until remission is achieved.
RUL ECT
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants showing no response will continue with RUL ECT until remission is achieved.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
- Age 18 or older
- Diagnosis of major depressive disorder (DSM-5 296.21-30) or bipolar disorder, depressed (DSM-5 296.51-54; 296.84), confirmed by MINI (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview)
You may not qualify if:
- Contra-indication for general anesthesia
- Non-Dutch speaking
- Diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder or schizophrenia, confirmed by MINI
- Diagnosis of substance use disorder in the past six months, confirmed by MINI
- Diagnosis of neurocognitive disorder or intellectual disability alongside a MoCA score \<23
- Previous ECT course in the past three months
- Participation in an interventional Trial with an investigational medicinal product or device
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuvenlead
- Universiteit Antwerpencollaborator
- AZ Sint-Jan AVcollaborator
- General Hospital Groeningecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
UPC Kortenberg
Kortenberg, Belgium
Related Publications (17)
Kolshus E, Jelovac A, McLoughlin DM. Bitemporal v. high-dose right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychol Med. 2017 Feb;47(3):518-530. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716002737. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
PMID: 27780482BACKGROUNDSemkovska M, Landau S, Dunne R, Kolshus E, Kavanagh A, Jelovac A, Noone M, Carton M, Lambe S, McHugh C, McLoughlin DM. Bitemporal Versus High-Dose Unilateral Twice-Weekly Electroconvulsive Therapy for Depression (EFFECT-Dep): A Pragmatic, Randomized, Non-Inferiority Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 1;173(4):408-17. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15030372. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
PMID: 26892939BACKGROUNDKellner CH, Knapp R, Husain MM, Rasmussen K, Sampson S, Cullum M, McClintock SM, Tobias KG, Martino C, Mueller M, Bailine SH, Fink M, Petrides G. Bifrontal, bitemporal and right unilateral electrode placement in ECT: randomised trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;196(3):226-34. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.066183.
PMID: 20194546BACKGROUNDSackeim HA, Prudic J, Devanand DP, Nobler MS, Haskett RF, Mulsant BH, Rosenquist PB, McCall WV. The benefits and costs of changing treatment technique in electroconvulsive therapy due to insufficient improvement of a major depressive episode. Brain Stimul. 2020 Sep-Oct;13(5):1284-1295. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.06.016. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
PMID: 32585354BACKGROUNDLapidus KA, Kellner CH. When to switch from unilateral to bilateral electroconvulsive therapy. J ECT. 2011 Sep;27(3):244-6. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e31820059e1. No abstract available.
PMID: 21681108BACKGROUNDBirkenhager TK, Roos J, Kamperman AM. Improvement after two sessions of electroconvulsive therapy predicts final remission in in-patients with major depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2019 Sep;140(3):189-195. doi: 10.1111/acps.13054. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
PMID: 31104321BACKGROUNDRush AJ, Gullion CM, Basco MR, Jarrett RB, Trivedi MH. The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): psychometric properties. Psychol Med. 1996 May;26(3):477-86. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700035558.
PMID: 8733206BACKGROUNDvan Diermen L, van den Ameele S, Kamperman AM, Sabbe BCG, Vermeulen T, Schrijvers D, Birkenhager TK. Prediction of electroconvulsive therapy response and remission in major depression: meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;212(2):71-80. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2017.28.
PMID: 29436330BACKGROUNDRush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, Nierenberg AA, Stewart JW, Warden D, Niederehe G, Thase ME, Lavori PW, Lebowitz BD, McGrath PJ, Rosenbaum JF, Sackeim HA, Kupfer DJ, Luther J, Fava M. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;163(11):1905-17. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905.
PMID: 17074942BACKGROUNDKirov G, Jauhar S, Sienaert P, Kellner CH, McLoughlin DM. Electroconvulsive therapy for depression: 80 years of progress. Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;219(5):594-597. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.37.
PMID: 35048827BACKGROUNDKellner CH, Obbels J, Sienaert P. When to consider electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Apr;141(4):304-315. doi: 10.1111/acps.13134. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
PMID: 31774547BACKGROUNDKellner CH, Knapp RG, Petrides G, Rummans TA, Husain MM, Rasmussen K, Mueller M, Bernstein HJ, O'Connor K, Smith G, Biggs M, Bailine SH, Malur C, Yim E, McClintock S, Sampson S, Fink M. Continuation electroconvulsive therapy vs pharmacotherapy for relapse prevention in major depression: a multisite study from the Consortium for Research in Electroconvulsive Therapy (CORE). Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;63(12):1337-44. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.12.1337.
PMID: 17146008BACKGROUNDKellner CH, Husain MM, Knapp RG, McCall WV, Petrides G, Rudorfer MV, Young RC, Sampson S, McClintock SM, Mueller M, Prudic J, Greenberg RM, Weiner RD, Bailine SH, Rosenquist PB, Raza A, Kaliora S, Latoussakis V, Tobias KG, Briggs MC, Liebman LS, Geduldig ET, Teklehaimanot AA, Lisanby SH; CORE/PRIDE Work Group. Right Unilateral Ultrabrief Pulse ECT in Geriatric Depression: Phase 1 of the PRIDE Study. Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 1;173(11):1101-1109. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15081101. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
PMID: 27418379BACKGROUNDSemkovska M, McLoughlin DM. Objective cognitive performance associated with electroconvulsive therapy for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Sep 15;68(6):568-77. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
PMID: 20673880BACKGROUNDSackeim HA, Decina P, Kanzler M, Kerr B, Malitz S. Effects of electrode placement on the efficacy of titrated, low-dose ECT. Am J Psychiatry. 1987 Nov;144(11):1449-55. doi: 10.1176/ajp.144.11.1449.
PMID: 3314538BACKGROUNDHusain MM, Rush AJ, Fink M, Knapp R, Petrides G, Rummans T, Biggs MM, O'Connor K, Rasmussen K, Litle M, Zhao W, Bernstein HJ, Smith G, Mueller M, McClintock SM, Bailine SH, Kellner CH. Speed of response and remission in major depressive disorder with acute electroconvulsive therapy (ECT): a Consortium for Research in ECT (CORE) report. J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;65(4):485-91. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0406.
PMID: 15119910BACKGROUNDMartinez-Amoros E, Goldberg X, Galvez V, de Arriba-Arnau A, Soria V, Menchon JM, Palao DJ, Urretavizcaya M, Cardoner N. Early improvement as a predictor of final remission in major depressive disorder: New insights in electroconvulsive therapy. J Affect Disord. 2018 Aug 1;235:169-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
PMID: 29656263BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pascal Sienaert, MD, PhD
UPC KU Leuven
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 1, 2023
First Posted
June 28, 2023
Study Start
June 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 1, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Details on methodology are noted in the protocol. Questionnaires will be used as stated in their manuals. Data of assessments (informed consent, answers to questionnaires,...) are documented on paper and entered in a data platform (Redcap). When access is provided, or data is exported (using a certain standard format such as .xls or .cvs) it can be reused by other researchers. All data is provided with a clear nomenclature, referring to the scores of standardized questionnaires,cognitive assessment tools, ECT parameters,... Further, published articles by the involved researchers will contain all details necessary to reveal context of data collection, collection methodology, analytical and procedural information, etc. The pseudonymized data can be made available upon request, after permission is granted by the principal investigator and the head researchers.