Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With and Without Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis
Comparison of Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With and Without Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis for Proximal ACL Tears: A Prospective Study
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators aimed to compare the clinical results of primary repairs and Lateral Extraarticular Tenodesis applied with primary repairs in the treatment of proximal ACL tears.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 23, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2023
CompletedAugust 31, 2023
August 1, 2023
1.1 years
March 23, 2023
August 29, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Comparison of functional outcomes between two groups of patients who underwent ACL repair surgery with or without lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) with International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC).
The outcomes were evaluated using various measures, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC). The IKDC is a patient-completed tool, which contains sections on knee symptoms (7 items), function (2 items), and sports activities (2 items). Scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms)
24 months
Comparison of functional outcomes between two groups of patients who underwent ACL repair surgery with or without lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) with Tegner-Lysholm scoring system.
The outcomes were evaluated using various measures, including theTegner-Lysholm scoring system. The Tegner Lysholm scale consists of eight items with each question response being assigned an arbitrary score on an increasing scale. The total score is the sum of each response to the eight questions and may range from 0-100 where higher scores indicate a better outcome with fewer symptoms or disability.
24 months
Study Arms (2)
Primary anterior cruciate ligament repair
ACTIVE COMPARATORInvestigators performed arthroscopic primary repair in 18 patients with proximal ACL tears.
Primary anterior cruciate ligament repair and lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInvestigators performed arthroscopic primary repair and lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) with iliotibial band in 20 patients with proximal ACL tears.
Interventions
Only arthroscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament repair was performed in patients with proximal anterior cruciate ligament tear.
In addition to primary anterior cruciate ligament repair, lateral extraarticular tenodesis was performed using the iliotibial band.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients who underwent surgery within the first 3 weeks after injury
- between the ages of 21-40 years,
- attended regular follow-up visits,
- Sherman type 1 proximal ACL tear with relatively preserved synovial sheath
- Sufficient tissue length for re-stretching.
You may not qualify if:
- torn ACL in the mid and distal region,
- torn synovial sheath,
- inability to undergo intrasubstance suturing,
- poor tissue quality with retraction,
- multiple ligament injuries and accompanying intra-knee pathologies (meniscal damage, chondral damage),
- previous knee surgery,
- rheumatologic diseases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
SBU Prof. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital
Istanbul, 34040, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (9)
Ateschrang A, Schreiner AJ, Ahmad SS, Schroter S, Hirschmann MT, Korner D, Kohl S, Stockle U, Ahrend MD. Improved results of ACL primary repair in one-part tears with intact synovial coverage. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):37-43. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5199-5. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
PMID: 30298414RESULTAbusleme S, Stromback L, Caracciolo G, Zamorano H, Cheyre J, Vergara F, Yanez R. Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Technique With an Iliotibial Band Strand Without Implants. Arthrosc Tech. 2021 Jan 20;10(1):e85-e89. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.09.029. eCollection 2021 Jan.
PMID: 33532213RESULTAchtnich A, Herbst E, Forkel P, Metzlaff S, Sprenker F, Imhoff AB, Petersen W. Acute Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: Outcomes After Arthroscopic Suture Anchor Repair Versus Anatomic Single-Bundle Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2016 Dec;32(12):2562-2569. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.04.031. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
PMID: 27324969RESULTAnderson MJ, Browning WM 3rd, Urband CE, Kluczynski MA, Bisson LJ. A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on the Topic of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016 Mar 15;4(3):2325967116634074. doi: 10.1177/2325967116634074. eCollection 2016 Mar.
PMID: 27047983RESULTCsintalan RP, Inacio MC, Funahashi TT. Incidence rate of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Perm J. 2008 Summer;12(3):17-21. doi: 10.7812/TPP/07-140.
PMID: 21331205RESULTDi Benedetto P, Di Benedetto E, Fiocchi A, Beltrame A, Causero A. Causes of Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Revision Surgical Strategies. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2016 Dec 1;28(4):319-324. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.16.007.
PMID: 27894180RESULTDiFelice GS, van der List JP. Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Primary Repair of Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears Are Maintained at Mid-term Follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2018 Apr;34(4):1085-1093. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.028. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
PMID: 29373290RESULTDiFelice GS, Villegas C, Taylor S. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Preservation: Early Results of a Novel Arthroscopic Technique for Suture Anchor Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair. Arthroscopy. 2015 Nov;31(11):2162-71. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.08.010.
PMID: 26542201RESULTFriden T, Roberts D, Ageberg E, Walden M, Zatterstrom R. Review of knee proprioception and the relation to extremity function after an anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001 Oct;31(10):567-76. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2001.31.10.567.
PMID: 11665744RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yasin Guler, Md
Metin Sabanci Baltalimani Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Orthopedics and Traumatology specialist,Chief assistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2023
First Posted
June 28, 2023
Study Start
February 1, 2020
Primary Completion
March 1, 2021
Study Completion
March 1, 2023
Last Updated
August 31, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share