Reliability And Validity Study Of "The Evaluation Tool For Myofascial Adhesions In Patients After Breast Cancer" In Turkish Language
MAP-BC
1 other identifier
observational
88
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this observational study is to translate the MAP-BC Evaluation Tool into Turkish by adapting it to Turkish society and to conduct a validity and reliability study in women who have received breast cancer treatment. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Are the same researcher's MAP-BC Evaluation Tool results similar at intervals to detect myofascial adhesions in breast cancer patients in Turkish population?
- Are the different researchers' MAP-BC Evaluation Tool results similar to detect myofascial adhesions in breast cancer patients in Turkish population?
- After comparing the results of Turkish version of both The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Observer Subscale and MAP-BC Evaluation Tool, is there a sufficient correlation between them?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Aug 2023
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 19, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 30, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2024
CompletedAugust 24, 2023
August 1, 2023
9 months
June 19, 2023
August 22, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
MAP-BC Evaluation Tool
This tool was developed to evaluate scar tissues that occured after breast cancer treatments. It quantitatively measures myofascial adhesions. The degree of adhesion is scored for each area at 3 different depth levels (skin, superficial, deep) as a 4-point scale (0: no adhesion - 3: severe adhesion). Axillary scar, breast/mastectomy scar, m. pectoralis region, frontal chest wall, lateral chest wall, axilla and inframammary fold are evaluated separately. Sum of the scores from three levels of each area gives the total score. The maximum score is 63. In Breast cancer patients, the inter-rater reliability of the detection of myofascial adhesions by palpation has been reported good to excellent.
11 months
POSAS
This assesment tool consists of two different scales evaluated by the observer and the patient. Its validity and reliability have been proven for the detection of scar tissue in patients who have undergone breast cancer surgery. The observer scale rates five variables, which include vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability and surface area, between 1-10 points (1:normal skin). The total score ranges from 5 to 50. The Turkish version of POSAS, whose validity and reliability studies were conducted, will be used in our study.
11 months
Study Arms (1)
Breast Cancer Patients
Patients who had undergone breast cancer surgery, aged between 18-75 years-old
Interventions
It's a tool to evaluate scar tissues that occured after breast cancer treatment. It quantitatively measures myofascial adhesions. The degree of adhesion is scored for each area at 3 different depth levels (skin, superficial, deep) as a 4-point scale (0: no adhesion - 3: severe adhesion). Axillary scar, breast/mastectomy scar, m. pectoralis region, frontal chest wall, lateral chest wall, axilla and inframammary fold are evaluated separately. Sum of the scores from three levels of each area gives the total score. The minimal total score is: 0 and the maximum total score is 63.
This assesment tool consists of two different scales evaluated by the observer and the patient.The observer scale rates five variables, which include vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability and surface area, between 1-10 points (1:normal skin). The total score ranges from 5 to 50.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients, aged between 18-75 years, who have undergone breast cancer surgery, visiting our oncological rehabilitation outpatient clinic between August 2023 and March 2024
You may qualify if:
- Breast cancer patients aged between 18-75 years who had undergone breast surgery
- providing a written consent to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who do not agree to participate the study
- Patients with active skin disease/infection which limits physical examination (palpation)
- Patients with a secondary breast cancer and/or metastasis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sultan 2. Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Kadıköy, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (7)
Truong PT, Lee JC, Soer B, Gaul CA, Olivotto IA. Reliability and validity testing of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in evaluating linear scars after breast cancer surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Feb;119(2):487-94. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000252949.77525.bc.
PMID: 17230080BACKGROUNDLewit K, Olsanska S. Clinical importance of active scars: abnormal scars as a cause of myofascial pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2004 Jul-Aug;27(6):399-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2004.05.004.
PMID: 15319762BACKGROUNDWild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A, Erikson P; ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005 Mar-Apr;8(2):94-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x.
PMID: 15804318BACKGROUNDBeaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. No abstract available.
PMID: 11124735BACKGROUNDDe Groef A, Van der Gucht E, Dams L, Evenepoel M, Teppers L, Toppet-Hoegars J, De Baets L. The association between upper limb function and variables at the different domains of the international classification of functioning, disability and health in women after breast cancer surgery: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Apr;44(8):1176-1189. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1800835. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
PMID: 32772650BACKGROUNDSeyyah M, Yurdalan SU. Cultural adaptation and validation of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale for Turkish use. Burns. 2018 Aug;44(5):1352-1356. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.02.026. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
PMID: 29580666BACKGROUNDDe Groef A, Van Kampen M, Vervloesem N, De Geyter S, Dieltjens E, Christiaens MR, Neven P, Geraerts I, Devoogdt N. An evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in patients after breast cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Development and interrater reliability. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 9;12(6):e0179116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179116. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28598978BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yeliz Bahar Özdemir
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 19, 2023
First Posted
June 28, 2023
Study Start
August 30, 2023
Primary Completion
May 30, 2024
Study Completion
July 30, 2024
Last Updated
August 24, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08