The Effect of Smart Sensor Combined With APP for Individualized Precise Exercise Training in Long Covid-19
Tri-service General Hospital, National Defence Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The coronavirus (COVID -19) has rapidly turned into a global pandemic. For patients diagnosed with COVID-19, it caused severe damage in the upper respiratory system and systemic complications, including the cardiovascular, mental, nervous, and musculoskeletal system. Previous research has indicated that these subsequent sequelae can reduce quality of life. (A. W. Wong et al., 2020) Studies have indicated that exercise training is beneficial to improve blood pressure, reduce cardiovascular factors, reduce complications, and relieve depression (J. Galloza et al., 2017) However, the current international research on the benefits of exercise rehabilitation and the improvement of quality of life in patients who have been infected with COVID-19 is still lacking. Under the international epidemic, it is pointed out that the importance of telerehabilitation has also been advocated worldwide. Previous systematic review indicated that no matter it is nervous, muscular or cardiac system disease, the efficacy of telerehabilitation is superior to face-to-face rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to compare the effect between the intervention of KNEESUP smart knee assistive device, and the health education in routine outpatient after diagnosis of Long Covid-19.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 26, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 11, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 27, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 15, 2024
CompletedApril 27, 2025
April 1, 2025
8 months
June 26, 2023
April 23, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (22)
Aerobic capacity (VO2 max in ml/kg/min )
Maximal VO2 during testing, also means aerobic capacity
baseline, 12 weeks
Anaerobic Threshold (mL/kg/min)
Anaerobic Threshold (AT) refers to the exercise intensity at which lactate begins to accumulate in the blood at a faster rate than it can be removed. It represents a transition point between predominantly aerobic metabolism (using oxygen) and increased anaerobic metabolism (without sufficient oxygen).
baseline, 12 weeks
Working load in watt
Maximal Working load during testing
baseline, 12 weeks
Breathing reserve (ml/kg/min)
A measure used during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to assess how much of a person's maximum ventilatory capacity is unused at peak exercise. It reflects the difference between the maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) and the minute ventilation (VE) reached during exercise.
baseline, 12 weeks
Rest Heart rate in beat/min
Resting heart rate during exercise testing
baseline, 12 weeks
O2 pulse in ml/beat
It means the heart pumps O2 volume by each heart beat, and also means left ventricle function.
baseline, 12 weeks
Systolic blood pressure in mm Hg
The resting blood pressure during exercise testing
baseline, 12 weeks
Diastolic blood pressure in mm Hg
The resting blood pressure during exercise testing
baseline, 12 weeks
VE/VCO2 slope
The ventilation/ perfusion abnormalities (VE/VCO2) is measured by graded exercise testing.The change in VE/VCO2 was calculated as the value at 12 weeks minus the value at baseline. A lower VE/VCO2 ratio indicates better ventilatory efficiency and reduced ventilation/perfusion abnormalities.
baseline, 12 weeks
Heart rate recovery
The heart rate recovery is measured by graded exercise testing, including 1 minute and 2 minute recovery. The change in heart rate recovery was calculated as the difference between heart rate recovery at 12 weeks and heart rate recovery at baseline. A decrease of \< 12 or 22 beats per minute in 1- or 2- min heart rate recovery, respectively, indicates an elevated risk of mortality. A faster heart rate recovery indicates better cardiovascular fitness and autonomic regulation.
baseline, 12 weeks
FVC (L/min)
The total amount of air exhaled (mL) during a forced expiratory volume test will be measured by spirometry. The change in FVC was calculated as the value at 12 weeks minus the value at baseline. A higher FVC indicates better lung function.
baseline, 12 weeks
FEV1 (L/min)
The amount of air exhaled (mL) during the first second during a forced expiratory volume test will be measured by spirometry. The change in FEV1 was calculated as the value at 12 weeks minus the value at baseline. A higher FEV1 indicates better lung function.
baseline, 12 weeks
FEV1/FVC (%)
The measured FEV1 is divided by the measured FVC. he change in FEV1/FVC was calculated as the value at 12 weeks minus the value at baseline. A higher FEV1/FVC ratio generally indicates better lung function, while a lower ratio suggests airflow limitation.
baseline, 12 weeks
Gait: Step length (m) through Time Up and Go Test
Analysis software was evaluated using METASENS. Begin by having the participants sit back in a standard arm chair and identify a 3 meters line on the floor. Participants walk forward three meters at the usual speed, turn around and return to the chair before sitting down. The METASENS evaluation analysis software calculates the step length (m), speed (m/s), cadence (steps per minute), left/right gait cycle (sec), left/right knee flexion angle (deg), left/right foot contact extension angle (deg), turn around time (sec), stand up time (sec), total walking time (sec).
baseline, 12 weeks
Gait: Speed (m/s) through Time Up and Go Test
Analysis software was evaluated using METASENS. Begin by having the participants sit back in a standard arm chair and identify a 3 meters line on the floor. Participants walk forward three meters at the usual speed, turn around and return to the chair before sitting down. The METASENS evaluation analysis software calculates the step length (m), speed (m/s), cadence (steps per minute), left/right gait cycle (sec), left/right knee flexion angle (deg), left/right foot contact extension angle (deg), turn around time (sec), stand up time (sec), total walking time (sec).
baseline, 12 weeks
Gait: Cadence (steps per minute) through Time Up and Go Test
Analysis software was evaluated using METASENS. Begin by having the participants sit back in a standard arm chair and identify a 3 meters line on the floor. Participants walk forward three meters at the usual speed, turn around and return to the chair before sitting down. The METASENS evaluation analysis software calculates the step length (m), speed (m/s), cadence (steps per minute), left/right gait cycle (sec), left/right knee flexion angle (deg), left/right foot contact extension angle (deg), turn around time (sec), stand up time (sec), total walking time (sec).
baseline, 12 weeks
Gait: Left gait cycle (sec) through Time Up and Go Test
Analysis software was evaluated using METASENS. Begin by having the participants sit back in a standard arm chair and identify a 3 meters line on the floor. Participants walk forward three meters at the usual speed, turn around and return to the chair before sitting down. The METASENS evaluation analysis software calculates the step length (m), speed (m/s), cadence (steps per minute), left/right gait cycle (sec), left/right knee flexion angle (deg), left/right foot contact extension angle (deg), turn around time (sec), stand up time (sec), total walking time (sec).
baseline, 12 weeks
Gait: Right gait cycle (sec) through Time Up and Go Test
Analysis software was evaluated using METASENS. Begin by having the participants sit back in a standard arm chair and identify a 3 meters line on the floor. Participants walk forward three meters at the usual speed, turn around and return to the chair before sitting down. The METASENS evaluation analysis software calculates the step length (m), speed (m/s), cadence (steps per minute), left/right gait cycle (sec), left/right knee flexion angle (deg), left/right foot contact extension angle (deg), turn around time (sec), stand up time (sec), total walking time (sec).
baseline, 12 weeks
Gait: Turn around time (sec) through Time Up and Go Test
Analysis software was evaluated using METASENS. Begin by having the participants sit back in a standard arm chair and identify a 3 meters line on the floor. Participants walk forward three meters at the usual speed, turn around and return to the chair before sitting down. The METASENS evaluation analysis software calculates the step length (m), speed (m/s), cadence (steps per minute), left/right gait cycle (sec), left/right knee flexion angle (deg), left/right foot contact extension angle (deg), turn around time (sec), stand up time (sec), total walking time (sec).
baseline, 12 weeks
Gait: Stand up time (sec) through Time Up and Go Test
Analysis software was evaluated using METASENS. Begin by having the participants sit back in a standard arm chair and identify a 3 meters line on the floor. Participants walk forward three meters at the usual speed, turn around and return to the chair before sitting down. The METASENS evaluation analysis software calculates the step length (m), speed (m/s), cadence (steps per minute), left/right gait cycle (sec), left/right knee flexion angle (deg), left/right foot contact extension angle (deg), turn around time (sec), stand up time (sec), total walking time (sec).
baseline, 12 weeks
Gait: Total walking time (sec) through Time Up and Go Test
Analysis software was evaluated using METASENS. Begin by having the participants sit back in a standard arm chair and identify a 3 meters line on the floor. Participants walk forward three meters at the usual speed, turn around and return to the chair before sitting down. The METASENS evaluation analysis software calculates the step length (m), speed (m/s), cadence (steps per minute), left/right gait cycle (sec), left/right knee flexion angle (deg), left/right foot contact extension angle (deg), turn around time (sec), stand up time (sec), total walking time (sec).
baseline, 12 weeks
Long COVID symptoms
A simple checklist to record Long COVID symptoms. Symptoms that persisted or were newly developed after acute infection were documented as sequelae. Symptoms included fatigue, shortness of breath, cognitive dysfunction (referred to as "brain fog"), chest pain, cough, dizziness, headache, sleep disturbances, palpitations, depression/anxiety, and olfactory dysfunction.
baseline, 12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Quality of life (scores)
baseline, 12 weeks
Sleeping Quality (scores)
baseline, 12 weeks
Body composition: Body weight (kg)
baseline, 12 weeks
Body composition: Body fat (%)
baseline, 12 weeks
Body composition: Lean mass weight (kg)
baseline, 12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
KNEESUP smart knee assistive device + KNEESUP care APP
EXPERIMENTALThe participants with KNEESUP smart knee assistive device and KNEESUP care APP do exercise training at home.
Health consultation
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe participants with healthy consultation do exercise training at home.
Interventions
In KNEESUP smart knee assistive device + KNEESUP care APP group, participants used the KNEESUP intelligent knee assistive device. Participants wore a knee brace with a sensor module on one side of the leg, the sensor could connect with the KNEESUP care APP which were installed in participant's mobile phone. The APP was designed with an individualized exercise program and the knee brace sensor could detect the action moment of the participants during exercise. This equipment could help the participants to achieve professional-level home rehabilitation.
In Healthy consulation group, participants received routine outpatient health education.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- symptoms last at least one month after recovery
- without physical impairment
- understood verbal or non-verbal communication
- normal cognitive function
- were willing to participate in the study and accept random allocation
You may not qualify if:
- diagnosed with transient ischemic attack or stroke
- had neuromuscular injury or surgery in the lower limbs in the past six months
- had heart rhythm regulator
- hospitalized during training
- had aggravated symptoms due to infection again
- had participated in other clinical trials or received other alternative treatments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Shang-Lin Chianglead
Study Sites (1)
Tri-service General Hospital
Taipei, 115, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Attending physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 26, 2023
First Posted
June 28, 2023
Study Start
July 11, 2023
Primary Completion
February 27, 2024
Study Completion
March 15, 2024
Last Updated
April 27, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share