Effect of APRV vs. LTV on Right Heart Function in ARDS Patients: a Single-center Randomized Controlled Study
Effect of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation vs. Low Tidal Volume Ventilation on Right Heart Function in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients: a Single-center Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is often complicated by Right Ventricular Dysfunction (RVD), and the incidence can be as high as 64%. The mechanism includes pulmonary vascular dysfunction and right heart systolic dysfunction. Pulmonary vascular dysfunction includes acute vascular inflammation, pulmonary vascular edema, thrombosis and pulmonary vascular remodeling. Alveolar collapse and over distension can also lead to increased pulmonary vascular resistance, Preventing the development of acute cor pulmonale in patients with acute respiratory distress. ARDS patients with RVD have a worse prognosis and a significantly increased risk of death, which is an independent risk factor for death in ARDS patients. Therefore, implementing a right heart-protective mechanical ventilation strategy may reduce the incidence of RVD. APRV is an inverse mechanical ventilation mode with transient pressure release under continuous positive airway pressure, which can effectively improve oxygenation and reduce ventilator-associated lung injury. However, its effect on right ventricular function is still controversial. Low tidal volume (LTV) is a mechanical ventilation strategy widely used in ARDS patients. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with LTV, APRV improved oxygenation more significantly, reduced the time of mechanical ventilation, and even had a tendency to improve the mortality of ARDS patients However, randomized controlled studies have shown that compared with LTV, APRV improves oxygenation more significantly and also increases the mean airway pressure. Therefore, some scholars speculate that APRV may increase the intrathoracic pressure, pulmonary circulatory resistance, and the risk of right heart dysfunction but this speculation is not supported by clinical research evidence. In addition, APRV may improve right ventricular function by correcting hypoxia and hypercapnia, promoting lung recruitment and reducing pulmonary circulation resistance. Therefore, it is very important to clarify this effect for whether APRV can be safely used and popularized in clinic.we aim to conduct a single-center randomized controlled study to further compare the effects of APRV and LTV on right ventricular function in patients with ARDS, pulmonary circulatory resistance (PVR) right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling (RV-PA coupling), and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 19, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 28, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 3, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2025
CompletedSeptember 18, 2025
May 1, 2025
1.6 years
June 19, 2023
September 14, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of right heart dysfunction in ARDS patients with APRV or LTV mechanical ventilation for 24h
Incidence of right heart dysfunction in ARDS patients with APRV or LTV mechanical ventilation for 24h.Abnormal findings on any of the following ultrasound measures can be considered as right ventricular dysfunction, including: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) \<17 mm, tricuspid annular plane systolic velocity (S') \<9.5 cm/s, right ventricular fractional area change (FAC) \<35%, ratio of right ventricular end-diastolic area to left ventricular end-diastolic area (RVEDA/LVEDA) \>0.6, or right ventricular to left ventricular end-diastolic diameter ratio (RV/LV ratio) \>1.
at the time of 24 hours after inclusion
Secondary Outcomes (31)
Incidence of right heart dysfunction in ARDS patients with APRV or LTV mechanical ventilation for 48h
at the time of 48 hours after inclusion
Incidence of right heart dysfunction in ARDS patients with APRV or LTV mechanical ventilation for 72h
at the time of 72 hours after inclusion
Values of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion at 24th hour
at the time of 24 hours after inclusion
Values of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion at 48th hour
at the time of 48 hours after inclusion
Values of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion at 72th hour
at the time of 72 hours after inclusion
- +26 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
APRV group
EXPERIMENTALIn APRV group, ventilator parameters were set according to the study protocol, P high: Tidal volume (VT) was set at 6ml/kg of ideal body weight, and plateau pressure (Pplat) was measured. Initial Phigh was set at Pplat, usually 20-32 cmH2O. The APRV end-expiratory flow rate was set at 75% of the peak expiratory flow rate.
LTV group
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe ARDSnet method was used for LTV group mechanical ventilation, and the tidal volume was set according to 4-8ml/kg, so that the Pplat was \<30cmH2O
Interventions
ventilator parameters were set according to the study protocol, P high: Tidal volume (VT) was set at 6ml/kg of ideal body weight, and plateau pressure (Pplat) was measured. Initial Phigh was set at Pplat, usually 20-32 cmH2O. The APRV end-expiratory flow rate was set at 75% of the peak expiratory flow rate.
The ARDSnet method was used for LTV mechanical ventilation, and the tidal volume was set according to 4-8ml/kg, so that the Pplat was \<30cmH2O
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- abdominal pressure≥20mmHg 2.BMI≥35kg/m2; 3. pregnant and lactating women 4.expected duration of invasive mechanical ventilation \< 72 hours 5. neuromuscular diseases known to require prolonged mechanical ventilation 6.severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe asthma, Interstitial lung disease 7.intracranial hypertension, 8.pulmonary bullae or pneumothorax, subcutaneous emphysema, or mediastinal emphysema, 9.extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or prone position ventilation on admission to the ICU 10. uncorrected shock of various types and refractory shock 11.pulmonary embolism 12.severe cardiac dysfunction (New York Heart Association class III or IV). Acute coronary syndrome or sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia), right heart enlargement due to chronic cardiopulmonary diseases, cardiogenic shock or after major cardiac surgery 13.poor cardiac sound window, unable to obtain cardiac ultrasound images 14.no informed consent was signed
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- XiaoJing Zou,MDlead
Study Sites (1)
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, 430000, China
Related Publications (10)
Zhang H, Huang W, Zhang Q, Chen X, Wang X, Liu D; Critical Care Ultrasound Study Group. Prevalence and prognostic value of various types of right ventricular dysfunction in mechanically ventilated septic patients. Ann Intensive Care. 2021 Jul 13;11(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00902-9.
PMID: 34255224BACKGROUNDBoissier F, Katsahian S, Razazi K, Thille AW, Roche-Campo F, Leon R, Vivier E, Brochard L, Vieillard-Baron A, Brun-Buisson C, Mekontso Dessap A. Prevalence and prognosis of cor pulmonale during protective ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Oct;39(10):1725-33. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2941-9. Epub 2013 May 15.
PMID: 23673401BACKGROUNDDong D, Zong Y, Li Z, Wang Y, Jing C. Mortality of right ventricular dysfunction in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome subjected to lung protective ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart Lung. 2021 Sep-Oct;50(5):730-735. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
PMID: 34118786BACKGROUNDMekontso Dessap A, Boissier F, Charron C, Begot E, Repesse X, Legras A, Brun-Buisson C, Vignon P, Vieillard-Baron A. Acute cor pulmonale during protective ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome: prevalence, predictors, and clinical impact. Intensive Care Med. 2016 May;42(5):862-870. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4141-2. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
PMID: 26650055BACKGROUNDSipmann FS, Santos A, Tusman G. Heart-lung interactions in acute respiratory distress syndrome: pathophysiology, detection and management strategies. Ann Transl Med. 2018 Jan;6(2):27. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.12.07.
PMID: 29430444BACKGROUNDCheng J, Ma A, Dong M, Zhou Y, Wang B, Xue Y, Wang P, Yang J, Kang Y. Does airway pressure release ventilation offer new hope for treating acute respiratory distress syndrome? J Intensive Med. 2022 Mar 28;2(4):241-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2022.02.003. eCollection 2022 Oct.
PMID: 36785647BACKGROUNDSun X, Liu Y, Li N, You D, Zhao Y. The safety and efficacy of airway pressure release ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(1):e18586. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018586.
PMID: 31895807BACKGROUNDZhou Y, Jin X, Lv Y, Wang P, Yang Y, Liang G, Wang B, Kang Y. Early application of airway pressure release ventilation may reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Nov;43(11):1648-1659. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4912-z. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
PMID: 28936695BACKGROUNDAndrews P, Shiber J, Madden M, Nieman GF, Camporota L, Habashi NM. Myths and Misconceptions of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation: Getting Past the Noise and on to the Signal. Front Physiol. 2022 Jul 25;13:928562. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.928562. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35957991BACKGROUNDRobinson B, Ebeid M. A simple echocardiographic method to estimate pulmonary vascular resistance. Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jan 15;113(2):412. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 7. No abstract available.
PMID: 24387904BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Xiaojing zou, MD
Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- participants are blinded to accept APRV or LTV after inclusion.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 19, 2023
First Posted
June 28, 2023
Study Start
July 3, 2023
Primary Completion
February 1, 2025
Study Completion
February 1, 2025
Last Updated
September 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05