The Effect of Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Tendon Vibration After Total Knee Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Knee osteoarthritis is a degenerative joint disease characterized by the destruction and progressive loss of articular cartilage. In an advanced stage of the disease, the patient undergoes a total knee joint replacement with an artificial joint (total arthroplasty). The aim of this clinical study is to investigate the effect of combining a therapeutic exercise program based on Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) and tendon vibration in older adult patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Ninety (90) adults over 65 years of age who will undergo TKA due to knee osteoarthritis will be divided into three groups of 30 people each (two intervention and one control). The participants in the first group will follow a therapeutic exercise protocol based on the PNF technique for six weeks. The participants in the second intervention group will follow the same therapeutic exercise program based on PNF, and at the same time, tendon vibration will be applied on the common insertion tendon of the rectus femoris and vastus medialis for the same period. Finally, the participants in the third group (control group) will receive instructions for performing exercises at home via a leaflet without receiving any additional treatment. The subjective perception of pain with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), active range of motion (AROM) of knee flexion with a goniometer, functional ability with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), quality of life with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), balance using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and Berg Balance Scale (BBS), center of mass displacement with a force platform, and knee proprioception through the calculation of joint position sense using the joint repositioning test will be assessed at the beginning of the intervention (4 weeks post-surgery), at the 6th week, and six months post-intervention. For the statistical analysis of the results, a two-factor analysis of variance with repeated measurements will be applied, with the statistical significance level set at p \< .05.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started Apr 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 17, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 15, 2024
CompletedJune 4, 2024
June 1, 2024
1.1 years
June 17, 2023
June 3, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Changes in neck pain intensity with Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
This tool is an eleven-point pain scale numbered from zero to 10. The left end of the scale corresponds to zero and is marked as "No pain", whereas the right end corresponds to 10 and is marked as "Maximum pain". Consequently, a higher value indicates more intense pain (Childs et al, 2005). The examinee is asked to choose an integer that best reflects the intensity of their pain. The NPRS is widely used to measure pain in both clinical practice and research, showing high test-retest reliability and high conceptual construct validity.
pre-treatment, week 6, 6-month follow-up
Changes in active Range of Motion (active ROM) of the knee joint flexion
Active range of knee flexion will be assessed with a long arm goniometer. The measurement will be performed with the subject supine on the examination bed based on the instructions by Hancock et al. (2018), according to whom, measurement with a long arm goniometer shows very high reliability. Three consecutive bends will be requested from the examinee and the highest measured value will be recorded.
pre-treatment, week 6, 6-month follow-up
3. Changes in functional capacity with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire
The KOOS questionnaire is a self-report tool for assessing functional limitations related to knee injuries or osteoarthritis (Roos et al., 1998). It is used in both research to assess functional ability and in clinical practice. The questionnaire includes 42 questions divided into five subscales: knee pain (KOOS pain), other knee symptoms (KOOS symptoms), functional limitations (KOOS ADL), ability to participate in sports or leisure activities (KOOS Sport/Rec), and quality of life (KOOS QOL). A five-point Likert scale from 0 (No problems) to 4 (Extreme problems) is used to score the questionnaire. Each of the KOOS subscales is scored separately, representing different aspects of the functional limitations experienced by the patient. The score for each subscale is converted to a 100-point scale, where a higher score indicates fewer functional limitations.
pre-treatment, week 6, 6-month follow-up
Changes in quality of life with Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis (WOMAC) index
The WOMAC index is widely used in the assessment of the quality of life of people with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee (Salafi et al. 2005). It is a self-report questionnaire consisting of 24 questions classified into three subscales: Pain, knee joint stiffness and functional ability in everyday skills.Test questions are scored on a scale of 0 to 4. Scores for each subscale are summed, with a possible score range of 0-20 for pain, 0-8 for stiffness, and 0-68 for functional ability. A sum of the scores for all three subscales gives a total WOMAC score. The higher the score, the less functional the joint.The internal consistency of the subcategories of the Greek WOMAC version ranges from high (0.804) to excellent (0.956), while the intra-class correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability have been characterized as excellent (ranging between 0.91 - 0.95) (Papathanasiou et al. 2015).
pre-treatment, week 6, 6-month follow-up
Changes in Timed Up and Go test
It is a simple test used to assess a person's mobility. It requires both static and dynamic balance and is a valid and reliable indicator of the functional ability of an individual (Podsiadlo \& Richardson, 1991). The participant starts in a seated position. They then stand up following the instructions of the therapist, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair and sit down. The examiner tracks time using a stopwatch. Time is calculated in seconds. A higher score indicates lower functional ability of the participant. The TUG shows high reliability indices in older adults both in measurements by different examiners and in measurements by the same examiner at different times (Cameron and Monroe, 2007).
pre-treatment, week 6, 6-month follow-up
Changes in Berg Balance scale Test
The Berg Balance Scale is a tool proposed by Berg (Berg et al., 1989; Berg et al., 1992) for assessing balance in the elderly. The test involves the execution of 14 tests of gradual increasing difficulty where in each one, the subject is asked to maintain a given position for a specific time or conduct specific tasks. Each of the 14 tests on the list is graded according to the balancing ability of the examinee from 0 to 4 points (with 0 indicating low balance ability, while 4 indicates high balance ability). According to Berg et al. (1992), a score of 56 indicates functional balance, whereas a score lower than 45 indicates notable balance deficits that have been related to increased fall risk. Studies have shown high intra-rater and inter-rater reliability in the elderly populations with intraclass correlation (ICC) ranging from .98 to .88 (Berg et al. 1992) and high content validity (Telenius et al., 2015).
pre-treatment, week: 3, 6, 6-month follow-up
Changes of center of mass (COM) displacement
Changes in COM displacement will be recorded using static posturography based on the protocol of Brech et al. (2022). Participants will remain barefoot and static for one minute while standing at ease on the force platform with feet shoulder-width apart, gazing at a target placed 2 meters away. Three attempts will be performed with one-minute intervals in between. The same procedure will be repeated with eyes closed. Parameters for measuring static balance under both conditions (eyes open and eyes closed) will include the root mean square of the displacement from the center of pressure (COP) in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions. Additionally, the maximum range of COP displacement (sum of maximum and minimum displacement/amplitude) in these directions, and the mean velocity from the total COP displacement in all directions will be considered. For calculating the COP displacement area, values representing 95% of the total displacement ellipse will be used.
pre-treatment, week 6, 6-month follow-up
Chances in knee joint position sense
Joint position sense will be calculated using the repositioning knee joint test according to the protocol of Relph and Herrington (2015). The joint position sense will be evaluated at two angles: 30° and 60°, with the knee moving from full extension (180°) to 90° flexion and vice versa. For the target angles, the participant will be required to replicate the specified angles.
pre-treatment, week 6, 6-month follow-up
Study Arms (3)
PNF Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants allocated to this group will receive 18 sessions of therapeutic exercise program based on the PNF concept (Bello et al. 2011).
PNF and Tendon Vibration Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants allocated to this group will receive the same PNF protocol with Group 1 in combination with the application of tendon vibration.
Control
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants allocated to this group will be given an exercise leaflet for home-based exercises
Interventions
The protocol will be individualized and will last 45 minutes. The following techniques will be applied: * Application of the "hold - relax" technique to increase the range of motion of knee flexion. * Rhythmic initiation with the application of diagonal trunk and lower limb shapes. * Application of stabilizing reversals from a sitting and standing position. * Application of dynamic reversals from a standing position. * Rhythmic stabilization. * Combination of isotonics. * Gait retraining.
Participants in this group will be given the same exercise program as Group 1 combined with the application of tendon vibration. Tendon vibration will be applied on both quadriceps' tendons in three weekly sessions (not on the same day as the exercise program). To implement the protocol, 100 Hz frequency mechanical stimulation will be applied.
Participants in this group will be given an exercise leaflet for home-based exercises and will be instructed to perform these exercises three times a week for the same period as the other two groups (6 weeks). They will also be given recommendations to maintain and increase their physical activity.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age over 65 years
- Unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty
- Body mass index less than 30
- Active knee flexion range of motion of at least 90° two weeks after surgery
- Written consent to participate in the research
You may not qualify if:
- Non-ambulatory patients with knee osteoarthritis
- Infections and other surgical complications following the procedure that result in prolonged hospitalization
- Neurodegenerative disease (e.g., Parkinson's)
- Cognitive deficits - dementia (Mini Mental State Exam Test score \< 23)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences International Hellenic Universit
Thessaloniki, Sindos Thessaloníki, 57400, Greece
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- A masked assessor will conduct the measurements
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dimitrios Lytras PT, PhD, Senior Lecturer of Physiotherapy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 17, 2023
First Posted
June 27, 2023
Study Start
April 1, 2023
Primary Completion
May 15, 2024
Study Completion
May 15, 2024
Last Updated
June 4, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share