Effects of Exergames and Resistance Training
Effects of the Combined Use of Exergaming and Resistance Training in Improving the Frailty of Nursing Home Residents: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Frailty is a common geriatric condition with significantly increased vulnerability to stress and susceptibility of negative health-related outcomes. Sacropenia and impaired cognitive function are two major contributors to frailty. This study aims to evaluate the effects of the combined use of exergaming and resistance training in improving the frailty of nursing home residents.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 17, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 27, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 30, 2025
CompletedSeptember 18, 2025
September 1, 2025
9 months
June 17, 2023
September 14, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (15)
Muscle quantity, higher score means better muscle quantity
Will be assessed using a bioelectrical impedance measurement
T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Change from baseline muscle quantity at 6 weeks, higher score means better muscle quantity
Will be assessed using a bioelectrical impedance measurement
T2: mid-intervention (week 6)
Change from baseline muscle quantity at 12 weeks, higher score means better muscle quantity
Will be assessed using a bioelectrical impedance measurement
T3: post-intervention (week 12)
Change from baseline muscle quantity at 16 weeks, higher score means better muscle quantity
Will be assssed using a bioelectrical impedance measurement
T4: 1 month follow up (week 16)
Change from baseline muscle quantity at 24 weeks, higher score means better muscle quantity
Will be assssed using a bioelectrical impedance measurement
T5: 3 months follow up (week 24)
Muscle strength, higher score means better muscle strength
Will be assessed using a handheld dynamometer
T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Change from baseline muscle strength at 6 weeks, higher score means better muscle strength
Will be assessed using a handheld dynamometer
T2: mid-intervention (week 6)
Change from baseline muscle strength at 12 weeks, higher score means better muscle strength
Will be assessed using a handheld dynamometer
T3: post-intervention (week 12)
Change from baseline muscle strength at 16 weeks, higher score means better muscle strength
Will be assessed using a handheld dynamometer
T4: 1 month follow up (week 16)
Change from baseline muscle strength at 24 weeks, higher score means better muscle strength
Will be assessed using a handheld dynamometer
T5: 3 months follow up (week 24)
Lower Extremity functions, score ranged from 0-12, higher scores mean better lower extremity functions
Will be assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery
T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Change from baseline lower extremity functions at 6 weeks, score ranged from 0-12, higher scores mean better lower extremity functions
Will be assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery
T2: mid-intervention (week 6)
Change from baseline lower extremity functions at 12 weeks, score ranged from 0-12, higher scores mean better lower extremity functions
Will be assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery
T3: post-intervention (week 12)
Change from baseline lower extremity functions at 16 weeks, score ranged from 0-12, higher scores mean better lower extremity functions
Will be assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery
T4: 1 month follow up (week 16)
Change from baseline lower extremity functions at 24 weeks, score ranged from 0-12, higher scores mean better lower extremity functions
Will be assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery
T5: 3 months follow up (week 24)
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Cognitive function, higher score means better cognitive function, score ranged from 0 - 30, higher scores mean better cognition
T1: baseline (before the study begins)
Change from baseline cognitive function at 6 weeks, higher score means better cognitive function, score ranged from 0 - 30, higher scores mean better cognition
T2: mid-intervention (week 6)
Change from baseline cognitive function at 12 weeks, higher score means better cognitive function, score ranged from 0 - 30, higher scores mean better cognition
T3: post-intervention (week 12)
Change from baseline cognitive function at 16 weeks, higher score means better cognitive function, score ranged from 0 - 30, higher scores mean better cognition
T4: 1 month follow up (week 16)
Change from baseline cognitive function at 24 weeks, higher score means better cognitive function, score ranged from 0 - 30, higher scores mean better cognition
T5: 3 months follow up (week 24)
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Exergames and resistance training group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive exergaming and resistance training programme over a period of 12 weeks
Resistance training group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive resistance training programme over a period of 12 weeks
Interventions
In each session, the participants will receive 40 minutes of combined use of exergaming and resistance training. The participants will practice the exergames using the gaming system Nintendo Switch (Nintendo Co., Ltd, Kyoto, Japan). The gaming software "Nintendo Switch Sports" will be adopted in which arrays of exergames are available to strengthen both the upper and lower extremity muscle and improve the balance ability of participants. The exergaming programme will consist of both upper (badminton game and tennis game) and lower (soccer game) extremity games. For week 1 and 2, the participants will first practice 1-minute warm up exercise (stretching exercises) and then the 3 exergames. For week 3 to 12, the participants will receive the same warm up exercise and exergames as if week 1 and 2 but there will be an addition of light cuff weight for resistance training.
The resistance training programme consists of 2 parts, the upper limb and lower limb resistance exercises. For the upper limb resistance exercises, the participants will first practice 5-minute warm up of upper limb using ergometer and then undergo 2 resistance exercises, including handgrip and elbow flexion. For the lower limb exercise, the participants will also first practice 5-minute warm up of lower limb using ergometer and then undergo 3 resistance exercises, including squatting, single-leg standing and knee extension.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- living in a nursing home
- fulfilled 1, 2 or 3 Fried Criteria of frailty
- score ≥7 of 10 on the Chinese version of the Abbreviated Mental Test
- able to follow the instructions of assessment and intervention
You may not qualify if:
- involved in any drug or other clinical trials
- having any additional medical conditions (such as epilepsy)
- unable to walk independently without the use of walking aids
- having any other conditions that will hinder the assessment and intervention (e.g.,visual/audio impairment could not be corrected by glasses/hearing aids etc).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Jockey club Institute of Health
Ho Man Tin, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- After the baseline assessment, all eligible participants will be allocated randomly in a 1:1 ratio to either (1) experimental group which received exergaming and resistance training over a period of 12 weeks, or (2) control group which received resistance training over a period of 12 weeks. The research assistant, who is responsible for allocation, is independent from the data collection and anslysis, and the intervention. The participants will be reminded not to disclose information related to group allocation to the assessors to prevent possible bias during measurement. All assessments will be performed by an assessor who is blinded to the group allocation and not involved in the delivery of the intervention.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 17, 2023
First Posted
June 27, 2023
Study Start
April 1, 2024
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
May 30, 2025
Last Updated
September 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09