Spoken Discourse Biomarker of PD Cognitive Impairment
Spoken Language Biomarker of Cognitive Impairment in PD
1 other identifier
observational
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to identify unique profiles of speech and language changes that distinguish individuals with Parkinson's disease from adults without Parkinson's disease and individuals with Parkinson's disease with cognitive (e.g., memory, thinking skills) impairment from those without cognitive impairment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2019
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 5, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 21, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2023
CompletedJune 18, 2023
June 1, 2023
4 years
October 21, 2021
June 8, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Discourse Composite Variable
Weighted variable comprised of discourse features extracted from spoken discourse samples across productivity, lexical retrieval, verbal fluency, syntax complexity, grammatical accuracy, narrative coherence, correct information units, and main event accuracy. Raw data from each measure are multiplied by a specified weight and summed to generate a single composite discourse score.
baseline
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Words per minute
baseline
Correct information units (CIUs)
baseline
% CIUs
baseline
CIUs/min
baseline
% Main Events
baseline
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Discourse Global Coherence
baseline
Discourse Local Coherence
baseline
Study Arms (2)
Pakinson's disease without cognitive impairment
* Age 50-90 years * Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (UK Brain Bank criteria) made by a movement disorders specialist * Under the care of a movement disorders specialist for a minimum of 1-year duration * Native monolingual English speaker * Hoehn \& Yahr score between 1.5 and 4 * Grade 10 education, or higher * Sufficient vision and hearing (aided or unaided) for all experiment tasks * Montreal Cognitive Assessment (or MoCA-converted MMSE score) greater than or equal to 25 * No subjective complaints of cognitive difficulty or word finding issues
Pakinson's disease with cognitive impairment
* Age 50-90 years * Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (UK Brain Bank criteria) made by a movement disorders specialist * Under the care of a movement disorders specialist for a minimum of 1-year duration * Native monolingual English speaker * Hoehn \& Yahr score between 1.5 and 4 * Grade 10 education, or higher * Sufficient vision and hearing (aided or unaided) for all experiment tasks * Montreal Cognitive Assessment (or MoCA-converted MMSE score) greater than or equal to 17 * Subjective complaints of cognitive difficulty or word finding issues, without significant impact on activities of daily living
Eligibility Criteria
Only individuals with PD will be newly recruited and enrolled as part of the study. Healthy adult data will be extracted from extant databases (publicly available) from NIH-funded studies.
You may qualify if:
- Only individuals with PD will be newly recruited and enrolled as part of the study. Healthy adult data will be extracted from extant databases (publicly available) from NIH-funded studies.
- Age 50-90 years
- Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (UK Brain Bank criteria) made by a movement disorders specialist
- Under the care of a movement disorders specialist for a minimum of 1-year duration
- Native monolingual English speaker
- Hoehn \& Yahr score between 1.5 and 4
- Grade 10 education, or higher
- Sufficient vision and hearing (aided or unaided) for all experiment tasks
- Montreal Cognitive Assessment (or MoCA-converted MMSE score) greater than or equal to 25
- No subjective complaints of cognitive difficulty or word finding issues
- Age 50-90 years
- Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (UK Brain Bank criteria) made by a movement disorders specialist
- Under the care of a movement disorders specialist for a minimum of 1-year duration
- Native monolingual English speaker
- Hoehn \& Yahr score between 1.5 and 4
- +9 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- History of unmanaged or untreated depression or major psychiatric illness
- History of deep brain stimulation surgery (DBS)
- Diagnosis of Dementia with Lewy Bodies
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Northwestern University
Evanston, Illinois, 60201, United States
Related Publications (10)
Nicholas LE, Brookshire RH. A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. J Speech Hear Res. 1993 Apr;36(2):338-50. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3602.338.
PMID: 8487525BACKGROUNDBrookshire RH, Nicholas LE. Speech sample size and test-retest stability of connected speech measures for adults with aphasia. J Speech Hear Res. 1994 Apr;37(2):399-407. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3702.399.
PMID: 8028321BACKGROUNDCapilouto G, Wright HH, Wagovich SA. CIU and main event analyses of the structured discourse of older and younger adults. J Commun Disord. 2005 Nov-Dec;38(6):431-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2005.03.005. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
PMID: 16199238BACKGROUNDRoberts A, Post D. Information Content and Efficiency in the Spoken Discourse of Individuals With Parkinson's Disease. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Sep 19;61(9):2259-2274. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0338.
PMID: 30208482BACKGROUNDThompson CK, Cho S, Hsu CJ, Wieneke C, Rademaker A, Weitner BB, Mesulam MM, Weintraub S. Dissociations Between Fluency And Agrammatism In Primary Progressive Aphasia. Aphasiology. 2012;26(1):20-43. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2011.584691.
PMID: 22199417BACKGROUNDThompson, C. K., Shapiro, L. P., Li, L., & Schendel, L. (1995). Analysis of verbs and verb-argument structure: A method for quantification of aphasic language production. Clinical Aphasiology, 23, 121-140.
BACKGROUNDHarris Wright, H., Koutsoftas, A., Fergadiotis, G., & Capilouto, G. (2010). Coherence in Stories Told by Adults With Aphasia.
BACKGROUNDWright HH, Capilouto GJ. Considering a multi-level approach to understanding maintenance of global coherence in adults with aphasia. Aphasiology. 2012 Jan 1;26(5):656-672. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2012.676855. Epub 2012 May 10.
PMID: 22962509BACKGROUNDGlosser G, Deser T. Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders. Brain Lang. 1991 Jan;40(1):67-88. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(91)90117-j.
PMID: 2009448BACKGROUNDVan Leer E, Turkstra L. The effect of elicitation task on discourse coherence and cohesion in adolescents with brain injury. J Commun Disord. 1999 Sep-Oct;32(5):327-48; quiz 348-9. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9924(99)00008-8.
PMID: 10498013BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 21, 2021
First Posted
June 18, 2023
Study Start
March 5, 2019
Primary Completion
February 15, 2023
Study Completion
February 15, 2023
Last Updated
June 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06