NCT05907538

Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn about interoception in patients with stress related syndromes (overstrain, burnout; SRS) and functional disorder (fibromyalgia/ chronic fatigue syndrome; FD). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is there a significant difference in interoception between patients with SRS and healthy controls?
  • Is there a significant difference in interoception between patients with FD and healthy controls?
  • Is there a significant difference in interoception between patients with SRS and FD? The participants will perform the respiratory occlusion discrimination task and have to fill out some questionnaires. Researchers will compare healthy controls to see if there is a significant difference.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
84

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 25, 2022

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 24, 2023

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 18, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

June 18, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

May 24, 2023

Last Update Submit

June 7, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

FibromyalgiaBurnoutInteroception

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Interoceptive accuracy

    Respiratory occlusion discrimination task (ROD task; Van Den Houte et al., 2021)

    20 minutes

  • Interoceptive sensibility

    Interoceptive Sensitivity and Attention Questionnaire (ISAQ; Bogaerts et al., 2022)

    5 minutes

  • Interoceptive sensibility

    THree-domain Interoceptive Sensations Questionnaire (THISQ; Vlemincx et al., 2021)

    5 minutes

  • Interoceptive awareness

    Visual analogue scale (0-100). A score of 0 indicates that participants are not certain at all of their answer, a score of 100 indicates that participants are entirely certain of their answer

    5 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Psychological variables

    5 minutes

  • Psychological variables

    5 minutes

  • Psychological variables

    5 minutes

  • Psychological variables

    10 minutes

  • Psychological variables

    5 minutes

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Patients with functional disorder (FD)

Patients with fibromyalgia diagnosed using the ACR criteria (American College of Rheumatology, Wolfe et al., 2010; 2016) Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome diagnosed using the CDC criteria (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Fukuda et al., 1994)

Other: Interoceptive accuracy measurementOther: Interoceptive sensibility measurementOther: Interoceptive awareness measurement

Patients with stress related syndromes (SRS)

Patients with overstrain and burnout according to the multidisciplinary guidelines for overstrain and burnout in primary care from the Dutch Society of Occupational Medicine (NVAB, 2011)

Other: Interoceptive accuracy measurementOther: Interoceptive sensibility measurementOther: Interoceptive awareness measurement

Healthy controls

Healthy controls will consist of people who experience few physical complaints in daily life. The healthy controls will thus be screened for inclusion using the CSD (Checklist for Symptoms in Daily life; Walentynowicz, et al., 2018). Only volunteers with a score of 75 or lower on this questionnaire will be included

Other: Interoceptive accuracy measurementOther: Interoceptive sensibility measurementOther: Interoceptive awareness measurement

Interventions

Interoceptive accuracy will be measured using the Respiratory Occlusion Discrimination Task (ROD task; Van Den Houte et al., 2021). The ROD task measures how good subjects are at distinguishing the lengths of short (max 620 milliseconds) inspiratory occlusions (or respiratory interruptions).

Healthy controlsPatients with functional disorder (FD)Patients with stress related syndromes (SRS)

Interoceptive sensibility will be measured using two self-report questionnaires, the The Interoceptive Sensitivity and Attention Questionnaire (ISAQ; Bogaerts et al., 2022) and the the Three-domain Interoceptive Sensations Questionnaire (THISQ; Vlemincx et al., 2021)

Healthy controlsPatients with functional disorder (FD)Patients with stress related syndromes (SRS)

Interoceptive awareness will be measures using a visual analogue scale (VAS)

Healthy controlsPatients with functional disorder (FD)Patients with stress related syndromes (SRS)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

All patients with fibromyalgia diagnosed according to the ACR criteria (Wolfe et al., 2010; 2016) are eligible to participate, all patients with chronic fatigue syndrome diagnosed according to the CDC criteria (Fukuda et al., 1994), and all patients with overstrain or burnout diagnosed according to the multidisciplinary guidelines for overstrain and burnout for first-line professionals from the Dutch Society of Occupational Medicine (NVAB, 2011) are eligible to participate

You may qualify if:

  • patients with fibromyalgia should be diagnosed by using the ACR criteria (American College of Rheumatology, Wolfe et al., 2010; Wolfe et al., 2016). patients with chronic fatigue syndrome should be diagnosed by using the CDC criteria (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Fukuda et al., 1994).

You may not qualify if:

  • Younger than 18 or older than 65
  • Pregnancy
  • Primary depressive episode, anxiety disorder, eating disorder, substance abuse, neurocognitive, or psychotic episode diagnosed with DSM-V (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; MINI-s; Overbeek et al., 1999).
  • Presence of a chronic organic disorder (One speaks of a chronic organic disorder if it is present for a period of at least 3 months. Examples include: Epilepsy, Heart Disease, Rheumatism, Asthma, Diabetes, etc.) or acute organic condition (fever, flu, etc.)
  • BMI \> 30
  • Eligibility Criteria patients with SRS (overstrain or burnout)
  • \- patients with overstrain or burnout should be diagnosed according to the multidisciplinary guidelines for overstrain and burnout for first-line professionals from the Dutch Society of Occupational Medicine (NVAB, 2011)
  • Younger than 18 or older than 65
  • Pregnancy
  • Primary depressive episode, anxiety disorder, eating disorder, substance abuse, neurocognitive, or psychotic episode diagnosed with DSM-V (MINI-s; Overbeek et al., 1999).
  • Presence of a chronic organic disorder (One speaks of a chronic organic disorder if it is present for a period of at least 3 months. Examples include: Epilepsy, Heart Disease, Rheumatism, Asthma, Diabetes, etc.) or acute organic condition (fever, flu, etc.)
  • BMI \> 30
  • Eligibility Criteria healthy controls
  • Healthy controls will be selected so that there is an equal ratio between patients and healthy controls for
  • Age group (per 5 years)
  • +10 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Hasselt University

Diepenbeek, Limburg, 3590, Belgium

RECRUITING

TRACE labs Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (ZOL)

Lanaken, 3620, Belgium

RECRUITING

Related Publications (23)

  • Haller H, Cramer H, Lauche R, Dobos G. Somatoform disorders and medically unexplained symptoms in primary care. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Apr 17;112(16):279-87. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0279.

    PMID: 25939319BACKGROUND
  • Barsky AJ, Borus JF. Functional somatic syndromes. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jun 1;130(11):910-21. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-11-199906010-00016.

    PMID: 10375340BACKGROUND
  • Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Katz RS, Mease P, Russell AS, Russell IJ, Winfield JB, Yunus MB. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 May;62(5):600-10. doi: 10.1002/acr.20140.

    PMID: 20461783BACKGROUND
  • Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Hauser W, Katz RL, Mease PJ, Russell AS, Russell IJ, Walitt B. 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Dec;46(3):319-329. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 30.

    PMID: 27916278BACKGROUND
  • Walentynowicz, M., Witthöft, M., Raes, F., Van Diest, I., & Van den Bergh, O. (2018). Sensory and affective components of symptom perception: a psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 9(2), 1-13. Doi: 10.5127/jep.059716

    BACKGROUND
  • Courtois I, Cools F, Calsius J. Effectiveness of body awareness interventions in fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015 Jan;19(1):35-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

    PMID: 25603742BACKGROUND
  • NVAB. (2011). Eén lijn in de eerste lijn bij overspanning en burnout: Multidisciplinaire richtlijn overspanning en burnout voor eerstelijns professionals. Geraadpleegd van https://nvab-online.nl/sites/default/files/bestanden-webpaginas/MDRL_Overspanning-Burnout.pdf

    BACKGROUND
  • Terluin, B., Van der Klink, J., Schaufeli, W. (2005). Stressgerelateerde klachten: spanningsklachten, overspanning en burnout. In J. Van der Klink, B. Terluin B (Reds), Psychische problemen en werk. Handboek voor een activerende begeleiding door huisarts en bedrijfsarts (p. 259-290). Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.

    BACKGROUND
  • van der Klink JJ, van Dijk FJ. Dutch practice guidelines for managing adjustment disorders in occupational and primary health care. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2003 Dec;29(6):478-87. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.756.

    PMID: 14712856BACKGROUND
  • Khalsa SS, Adolphs R, Cameron OG, Critchley HD, Davenport PW, Feinstein JS, Feusner JD, Garfinkel SN, Lane RD, Mehling WE, Meuret AE, Nemeroff CB, Oppenheimer S, Petzschner FH, Pollatos O, Rhudy JL, Schramm LP, Simmons WK, Stein MB, Stephan KE, Van den Bergh O, Van Diest I, von Leupoldt A, Paulus MP; Interoception Summit 2016 participants. Interoception and Mental Health: A Roadmap. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Jun;3(6):501-513. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

    PMID: 29884281BACKGROUND
  • Garfinkel SN, Seth AK, Barrett AB, Suzuki K, Critchley HD. Knowing your own heart: distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biol Psychol. 2015 Jan;104:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 20.

    PMID: 25451381BACKGROUND
  • Van Den Houte M, Vlemincx E, Franssen M, Van Diest I, Van Oudenhove L, Luminet O. The respiratory occlusion discrimination task: A new paradigm to measure respiratory interoceptive accuracy. Psychophysiology. 2021 Apr;58(4):e13760. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13760. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

    PMID: 33438245BACKGROUND
  • Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, Sharpe MC, Dobbins JG, Komaroff A. The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Dec 15;121(12):953-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-12-199412150-00009.

    PMID: 7978722BACKGROUND
  • Bogaerts K, Walentynowicz M, Van Den Houte M, Constantinou E, Van den Bergh O. The Interoceptive Sensitivity and Attention Questionnaire: Evaluating Aspects of Self-Reported Interoception in Patients With Persistent Somatic Symptoms, Stress-Related Syndromes, and Healthy Controls. Psychosom Med. 2022 Feb-Mar 01;84(2):251-260. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001038.

    PMID: 34840287BACKGROUND
  • Vlemincx E, Walentynowicz M, Zamariola G, Van Oudenhove L, Luminet O. A novel self-report scale of interoception: the three-domain interoceptive sensations questionnaire (THISQ). Psychol Health. 2023 Sep-Oct;38(9):1234-1253. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2021.2009479. Epub 2021 Dec 7.

    PMID: 34875958BACKGROUND
  • Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.

    PMID: 3397865BACKGROUND
  • Nijenhuis, E. R. S., van der Hart, O., & Kruger, K. (2002). The psychometric characteristics of the Traumatic Experiernce Checklist (TEC): First findings among psychiatric outpatients. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 9(3). 200-210. DOI: 10.1002/cpp.332

    BACKGROUND
  • Bagby RM, Parker JD, Taylor GJ. The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jan;38(1):23-32. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1.

    PMID: 8126686BACKGROUND
  • Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, Waltz T, Zettle RD. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):676-88. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 May 25.

    PMID: 22035996BACKGROUND
  • Frost, R. O., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14(5), 449-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172967

    BACKGROUND
  • Tellegen A, Atkinson G. Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences ("absorption"), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. J Abnorm Psychol. 1974 Jun;83(3):268-77. doi: 10.1037/h0036681. No abstract available.

    PMID: 4844914BACKGROUND
  • Overbeek, T., Schrueurs, K., & Griez, E. (1999). MINI-the international neuropsychiatric interview. Dutch version 5.0.0 DSM-IV. Maastricht (Netherlands): University of Maastricht.

    BACKGROUND
  • Ramakers I, Fonteyne R, Walentynowicz M, Oudenhove LV, Houte MVD, Bogaerts K. The Need for Controllability and Predictability questionnaire (NCP-q): psychometric properties and preliminary findings in a clinical sample. Health Psychol Rep. 2025 Jan 24;13(2):201-214. doi: 10.5114/hpr/195733. eCollection 2025.

    PMID: 40487476BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

FibromyalgiaBurnout, Psychological

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesStress, PsychologicalBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Katleen Bogaerts, PhD

    Hasselt University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Indra Ramakers, Dra

CONTACT

Marleen Missotten

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD researcher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2023

First Posted

June 18, 2023

Study Start

July 25, 2022

Primary Completion

June 30, 2024

Study Completion

June 30, 2024

Last Updated

June 18, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Locations