Interoception in Patients With Medically Unexplained Symptoms
1 other identifier
observational
84
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to learn about interoception in patients with stress related syndromes (overstrain, burnout; SRS) and functional disorder (fibromyalgia/ chronic fatigue syndrome; FD). The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Is there a significant difference in interoception between patients with SRS and healthy controls?
- Is there a significant difference in interoception between patients with FD and healthy controls?
- Is there a significant difference in interoception between patients with SRS and FD? The participants will perform the respiratory occlusion discrimination task and have to fill out some questionnaires. Researchers will compare healthy controls to see if there is a significant difference.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jul 2022
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 25, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 24, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2024
CompletedJune 18, 2023
June 1, 2023
1.9 years
May 24, 2023
June 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Interoceptive accuracy
Respiratory occlusion discrimination task (ROD task; Van Den Houte et al., 2021)
20 minutes
Interoceptive sensibility
Interoceptive Sensitivity and Attention Questionnaire (ISAQ; Bogaerts et al., 2022)
5 minutes
Interoceptive sensibility
THree-domain Interoceptive Sensations Questionnaire (THISQ; Vlemincx et al., 2021)
5 minutes
Interoceptive awareness
Visual analogue scale (0-100). A score of 0 indicates that participants are not certain at all of their answer, a score of 100 indicates that participants are entirely certain of their answer
5 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Psychological variables
5 minutes
Psychological variables
5 minutes
Psychological variables
5 minutes
Psychological variables
10 minutes
Psychological variables
5 minutes
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Patients with functional disorder (FD)
Patients with fibromyalgia diagnosed using the ACR criteria (American College of Rheumatology, Wolfe et al., 2010; 2016) Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome diagnosed using the CDC criteria (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Fukuda et al., 1994)
Patients with stress related syndromes (SRS)
Patients with overstrain and burnout according to the multidisciplinary guidelines for overstrain and burnout in primary care from the Dutch Society of Occupational Medicine (NVAB, 2011)
Healthy controls
Healthy controls will consist of people who experience few physical complaints in daily life. The healthy controls will thus be screened for inclusion using the CSD (Checklist for Symptoms in Daily life; Walentynowicz, et al., 2018). Only volunteers with a score of 75 or lower on this questionnaire will be included
Interventions
Interoceptive accuracy will be measured using the Respiratory Occlusion Discrimination Task (ROD task; Van Den Houte et al., 2021). The ROD task measures how good subjects are at distinguishing the lengths of short (max 620 milliseconds) inspiratory occlusions (or respiratory interruptions).
Interoceptive sensibility will be measured using two self-report questionnaires, the The Interoceptive Sensitivity and Attention Questionnaire (ISAQ; Bogaerts et al., 2022) and the the Three-domain Interoceptive Sensations Questionnaire (THISQ; Vlemincx et al., 2021)
Interoceptive awareness will be measures using a visual analogue scale (VAS)
Eligibility Criteria
All patients with fibromyalgia diagnosed according to the ACR criteria (Wolfe et al., 2010; 2016) are eligible to participate, all patients with chronic fatigue syndrome diagnosed according to the CDC criteria (Fukuda et al., 1994), and all patients with overstrain or burnout diagnosed according to the multidisciplinary guidelines for overstrain and burnout for first-line professionals from the Dutch Society of Occupational Medicine (NVAB, 2011) are eligible to participate
You may qualify if:
- patients with fibromyalgia should be diagnosed by using the ACR criteria (American College of Rheumatology, Wolfe et al., 2010; Wolfe et al., 2016). patients with chronic fatigue syndrome should be diagnosed by using the CDC criteria (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Fukuda et al., 1994).
You may not qualify if:
- Younger than 18 or older than 65
- Pregnancy
- Primary depressive episode, anxiety disorder, eating disorder, substance abuse, neurocognitive, or psychotic episode diagnosed with DSM-V (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; MINI-s; Overbeek et al., 1999).
- Presence of a chronic organic disorder (One speaks of a chronic organic disorder if it is present for a period of at least 3 months. Examples include: Epilepsy, Heart Disease, Rheumatism, Asthma, Diabetes, etc.) or acute organic condition (fever, flu, etc.)
- BMI \> 30
- Eligibility Criteria patients with SRS (overstrain or burnout)
- \- patients with overstrain or burnout should be diagnosed according to the multidisciplinary guidelines for overstrain and burnout for first-line professionals from the Dutch Society of Occupational Medicine (NVAB, 2011)
- Younger than 18 or older than 65
- Pregnancy
- Primary depressive episode, anxiety disorder, eating disorder, substance abuse, neurocognitive, or psychotic episode diagnosed with DSM-V (MINI-s; Overbeek et al., 1999).
- Presence of a chronic organic disorder (One speaks of a chronic organic disorder if it is present for a period of at least 3 months. Examples include: Epilepsy, Heart Disease, Rheumatism, Asthma, Diabetes, etc.) or acute organic condition (fever, flu, etc.)
- BMI \> 30
- Eligibility Criteria healthy controls
- Healthy controls will be selected so that there is an equal ratio between patients and healthy controls for
- Age group (per 5 years)
- +10 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hasselt Universitylead
- TRACE labs Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (ZOL)collaborator
Study Sites (2)
Hasselt University
Diepenbeek, Limburg, 3590, Belgium
TRACE labs Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (ZOL)
Lanaken, 3620, Belgium
Related Publications (23)
Haller H, Cramer H, Lauche R, Dobos G. Somatoform disorders and medically unexplained symptoms in primary care. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Apr 17;112(16):279-87. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0279.
PMID: 25939319BACKGROUNDBarsky AJ, Borus JF. Functional somatic syndromes. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jun 1;130(11):910-21. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-11-199906010-00016.
PMID: 10375340BACKGROUNDWolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Katz RS, Mease P, Russell AS, Russell IJ, Winfield JB, Yunus MB. The American College of Rheumatology preliminary diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia and measurement of symptom severity. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 May;62(5):600-10. doi: 10.1002/acr.20140.
PMID: 20461783BACKGROUNDWolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles MA, Goldenberg DL, Hauser W, Katz RL, Mease PJ, Russell AS, Russell IJ, Walitt B. 2016 Revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Dec;46(3):319-329. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
PMID: 27916278BACKGROUNDWalentynowicz, M., Witthöft, M., Raes, F., Van Diest, I., & Van den Bergh, O. (2018). Sensory and affective components of symptom perception: a psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 9(2), 1-13. Doi: 10.5127/jep.059716
BACKGROUNDCourtois I, Cools F, Calsius J. Effectiveness of body awareness interventions in fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015 Jan;19(1):35-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.04.003. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
PMID: 25603742BACKGROUNDNVAB. (2011). Eén lijn in de eerste lijn bij overspanning en burnout: Multidisciplinaire richtlijn overspanning en burnout voor eerstelijns professionals. Geraadpleegd van https://nvab-online.nl/sites/default/files/bestanden-webpaginas/MDRL_Overspanning-Burnout.pdf
BACKGROUNDTerluin, B., Van der Klink, J., Schaufeli, W. (2005). Stressgerelateerde klachten: spanningsklachten, overspanning en burnout. In J. Van der Klink, B. Terluin B (Reds), Psychische problemen en werk. Handboek voor een activerende begeleiding door huisarts en bedrijfsarts (p. 259-290). Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.
BACKGROUNDvan der Klink JJ, van Dijk FJ. Dutch practice guidelines for managing adjustment disorders in occupational and primary health care. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2003 Dec;29(6):478-87. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.756.
PMID: 14712856BACKGROUNDKhalsa SS, Adolphs R, Cameron OG, Critchley HD, Davenport PW, Feinstein JS, Feusner JD, Garfinkel SN, Lane RD, Mehling WE, Meuret AE, Nemeroff CB, Oppenheimer S, Petzschner FH, Pollatos O, Rhudy JL, Schramm LP, Simmons WK, Stein MB, Stephan KE, Van den Bergh O, Van Diest I, von Leupoldt A, Paulus MP; Interoception Summit 2016 participants. Interoception and Mental Health: A Roadmap. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2018 Jun;3(6):501-513. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
PMID: 29884281BACKGROUNDGarfinkel SN, Seth AK, Barrett AB, Suzuki K, Critchley HD. Knowing your own heart: distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biol Psychol. 2015 Jan;104:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
PMID: 25451381BACKGROUNDVan Den Houte M, Vlemincx E, Franssen M, Van Diest I, Van Oudenhove L, Luminet O. The respiratory occlusion discrimination task: A new paradigm to measure respiratory interoceptive accuracy. Psychophysiology. 2021 Apr;58(4):e13760. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13760. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
PMID: 33438245BACKGROUNDFukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, Sharpe MC, Dobbins JG, Komaroff A. The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Dec 15;121(12):953-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-12-199412150-00009.
PMID: 7978722BACKGROUNDBogaerts K, Walentynowicz M, Van Den Houte M, Constantinou E, Van den Bergh O. The Interoceptive Sensitivity and Attention Questionnaire: Evaluating Aspects of Self-Reported Interoception in Patients With Persistent Somatic Symptoms, Stress-Related Syndromes, and Healthy Controls. Psychosom Med. 2022 Feb-Mar 01;84(2):251-260. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001038.
PMID: 34840287BACKGROUNDVlemincx E, Walentynowicz M, Zamariola G, Van Oudenhove L, Luminet O. A novel self-report scale of interoception: the three-domain interoceptive sensations questionnaire (THISQ). Psychol Health. 2023 Sep-Oct;38(9):1234-1253. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2021.2009479. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
PMID: 34875958BACKGROUNDWatson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
PMID: 3397865BACKGROUNDNijenhuis, E. R. S., van der Hart, O., & Kruger, K. (2002). The psychometric characteristics of the Traumatic Experiernce Checklist (TEC): First findings among psychiatric outpatients. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 9(3). 200-210. DOI: 10.1002/cpp.332
BACKGROUNDBagby RM, Parker JD, Taylor GJ. The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jan;38(1):23-32. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1.
PMID: 8126686BACKGROUNDBond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, Waltz T, Zettle RD. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):676-88. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 May 25.
PMID: 22035996BACKGROUNDFrost, R. O., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14(5), 449-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172967
BACKGROUNDTellegen A, Atkinson G. Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences ("absorption"), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. J Abnorm Psychol. 1974 Jun;83(3):268-77. doi: 10.1037/h0036681. No abstract available.
PMID: 4844914BACKGROUNDOverbeek, T., Schrueurs, K., & Griez, E. (1999). MINI-the international neuropsychiatric interview. Dutch version 5.0.0 DSM-IV. Maastricht (Netherlands): University of Maastricht.
BACKGROUNDRamakers I, Fonteyne R, Walentynowicz M, Oudenhove LV, Houte MVD, Bogaerts K. The Need for Controllability and Predictability questionnaire (NCP-q): psychometric properties and preliminary findings in a clinical sample. Health Psychol Rep. 2025 Jan 24;13(2):201-214. doi: 10.5114/hpr/195733. eCollection 2025.
PMID: 40487476BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Katleen Bogaerts, PhD
Hasselt University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD researcher
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 24, 2023
First Posted
June 18, 2023
Study Start
July 25, 2022
Primary Completion
June 30, 2024
Study Completion
June 30, 2024
Last Updated
June 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06