Comparison of Ketamine and Esketamine in Patients Suffering From Fibromyalgia Syndrome.
KESK-FIQ
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ketamine and Esketamine intravenous perfusions can modulate chronic pain. The purpose of this study is to determine if Ketamine or Esketamine are favorable for outpatients suffering from fibromyalgia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 17, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 24, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2022
CompletedAugust 27, 2021
August 1, 2021
10 months
June 17, 2021
August 26, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Score variations of Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) completed by the patient. The FIQ was developed from information gathered from patient reports, functional status instruments, and clinical observations. This instrument measures physical functioning, work status (missed days of work and job difficulty), depression, anxiety, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week. The score is between 0 and 100. In the severity analysis a FIQ total score from 0 to \< 39 was found to represent a mild effect, ≥ 39 to \< 59 a moderate effect, and ≥ 59 to 100 a severe effect.
At day 0 before starting each intravenous perfusion.
Score variations of Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) completed by the patient. The FIQ was developed from information gathered from patient reports, functional status instruments, and clinical observations. This instrument measures physical functioning, work status (missed days of work and job difficulty), depression, anxiety, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week. The score is between 0 and 100. In the severity analysis a FIQ total score from 0 to \< 39 was found to represent a mild effect, ≥ 39 to \< 59 a moderate effect, and ≥ 59 to 100 a severe effect.
At day 7 after each intravenous perfusion.
Score variations of Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) completed by the patient. The FIQ was developed from information gathered from patient reports, functional status instruments, and clinical observations. This instrument measures physical functioning, work status (missed days of work and job difficulty), depression, anxiety, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week. The score is between 0 and 100. In the severity analysis a FIQ total score from 0 to \< 39 was found to represent a mild effect, ≥ 39 to \< 59 a moderate effect, and ≥ 59 to 100 a severe effect.
At day 14 after each intravenous perfusion.
Score variations of Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) completed by the patient. The FIQ was developed from information gathered from patient reports, functional status instruments, and clinical observations. This instrument measures physical functioning, work status (missed days of work and job difficulty), depression, anxiety, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week. The score is between 0 and 100. In the severity analysis a FIQ total score from 0 to \< 39 was found to represent a mild effect, ≥ 39 to \< 59 a moderate effect, and ≥ 59 to 100 a severe effect.
At day 21 after each intravenous perfusion.
Score variations of Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire
Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) completed by the patient. The FIQ was developed from information gathered from patient reports, functional status instruments, and clinical observations. This instrument measures physical functioning, work status (missed days of work and job difficulty), depression, anxiety, morning tiredness, pain, stiffness, fatigue, and well-being over the past week. The score is between 0 and 100. In the severity analysis a FIQ total score from 0 to \< 39 was found to represent a mild effect, ≥ 39 to \< 59 a moderate effect, and ≥ 59 to 100 a severe effect.
At day 28 after each intravenous perfusion.
Secondary Outcomes (25)
Heart rate disturbances after intravenous perfusion of Ketamine or Esketamine
At the beginning (minute zero) of each intravenous perfusion.
Heart rate disturbances after intravenous perfusion of Ketamine or Esketamine
After 30 minutes of each intravenous perfusion.
Heart rate disturbances after intravenous perfusion of Ketamine or Esketamine
After 60 minutes of each intravenous perfusion.
Heart rate disturbances after intravenous perfusion of Ketamine or Esketamine
After 90 minutes of each intravenous perfusion.
Heart rate disturbances after intravenous perfusion of Ketamine or Esketamine
After 120 minutes of each intravenous perfusion.
- +20 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
AB group
ACTIVE COMPARATORIf A = Ketamine and B = Esketamine, each patient included in the study will be randomized in a sequence of administration of the two products. The AB sequence consists of patients starting with intravenous Ketamine 0,3 mg/kg in 1 hour (2 infusions separated by 6 weeks; Period 1) and continuing with intravenous Esketamine 0,15 mg/kg in 1 hour (2 infusions separated by 6 weeks; Period 2). Each patient will be monitored during the IV perfusion, and then, the next hour. The patient will receive a total of two infusions of Ketamine and two infusions of Esketamine. Each patient will be his own witness because having received the two products without knowing which he started with. A "wash-out" period of one week will be observed between the two administration periods to avoid so-called "carry-over" effects according to which the administration of the first drug could influence the effect of the second drug administered.
BA group
OTHERIf A = Ketamine and B = Esketamine, each patient included in the study will be randomized in a sequence of administration of the two products. The BA sequence consists of patients starting with intravenous Esketamine 0,15 mg/kg in 1 hour (2 infusions separated by 6 weeks; Period 1) and continuing with intravenous Ketamine 0,3 mg/kg in 1 hour (2 infusions separated by 6 weeks; Period 2). Each patient will be monitored during the IV perfusion, and then, the next hour. The patient will receive a total of two infusions of Esketamine and then two infusions of Ketamine. Each patient will be his own witness because having received the two products without knowing which he started with. A "wash-out" period of one week will be observed between the two administration periods to avoid so-called "carry-over" effects according to which the administration of the first drug could influence the effect of the second drug administered.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male and female
- Between 18 and 75 years old
- Reads and writes French
- Diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome according to Widespread Pain Index (WPI) and Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) score ≥ 13/31
- Both molecules (Ketamine and Esketamine) were administered at least once during an analgesic infusion session in Pain Clinic
- Patient with regular medical follow-up by a pain specialist at least 3 times a year
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy or intolerance to Ketamine or Esketamine
- Current infection, fever
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
- Serious cardiovascular disorders and severe hypertension
- Increased pressure of cerebrospinal fluid and severe intracranial disease
- Acute intermittent porphyria
- Untreated epilepsy
- Untreated glaucoma
- Difficult or impossible intravenous access
- Chronic Liver Disease Child-Pugh C
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHU de Charleroi
Lodelinsart, Hainaut, 6042, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brice Constant, MD
Centre Universitaire de Charleroi
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 17, 2021
First Posted
June 24, 2021
Study Start
July 1, 2021
Primary Completion
May 1, 2022
Study Completion
September 30, 2022
Last Updated
August 27, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD will be available according to reasonable demands.