Hypotension Prediction Index to Predict Epidural-labor Analgesia Induced Hypotension
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this pilot trial is to examine the feasibility and ease of use of monitoring by ClearSight in laboring and delivering patients with the intent to compare time-to-treatment of hypotension between conventionally monitored patients (Group CM) and those receiving HPI (Group CM + HPI) monitoring by ClearSight, in a population of healthy laboring women who receive epidural analgesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 18, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 29, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 4, 2025
CompletedNovember 4, 2025
August 1, 2025
4 months
May 8, 2023
August 28, 2025
October 10, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Time-to-treatment of Hypotension (Minutes)
The difference in time between diagnosis of hypotension and treatment by clinical staff between CM and HPI groups
From epidural placement until 4-hours post-infusion start
Ease of Use by Clinical Staff
Clinical nurse reports of ease of use of ClearSight device. This outcome will be measured on a Likert Scale (0-4) with the options being: 0-Completely Disagree, 1-Disagree, 2-Neither agree nor disagree, 3-Agree, 4-Completely Agree. Outcome measure will be reported as count of participant's responses per category. For this scale, the objective was to obtain agreeable response feedback (score of 3 or 4). The specific question to measure ease of use by clinical staff was: "The ClearSight blood pressure monitoring device seems easy to use."
report at 4-hour post-infusion
Ease of Hypotension Detection by Clinical Staff
Clinical nurse reports of ease of hypotension detection using ClearSight device. This outcome will be measured on a Likert Scale (0-4) with the options being: 0-Completely Disagree, 1-Disagree, 2-Neither agree nor disagree, 3-Agree, 4-Completely Agree. Outcome measure will be reported as count of participant's responses per category. For this scale, the objective was to obtain agreeable response feedback (score of 3 or 4). The specific question to measure ease of use by clinical staff was: "The ClearSight blood pressure monitoring device seems suitable."
report at 4-hour post-infusion
Satisfaction of ClearSight Use by Clinical Staff
Clinical nurse reports of satisfaction of use of ClearSight device. This outcome will be measured on a Likert Scale (0-4) with the options being: 0-Completely Disagree, 1-Disagree, 2-Neither agree nor disagree, 3-Agree, 4-Completely Agree. Outcome measure will be reported as count of participant's responses per category. For this scale, the objective was to obtain agreeable response feedback (score of 3 or 4). The specific question to measure ease of use by clinical staff was: "The ClearSight blood pressure monitoring device meets my approval."
report at 4-hour post-infusion
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Total Time in Hypotension With Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) <65 mmHg (in Minutes)
Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Nausea (Yes/No)
Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Vomiting (Yes/No)
Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Total Phenylephrine, mg
Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
Total Ephedrine, mg
Epidural placement to 4-hours post-infusion start
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Conventional Care
SHAM COMPARATORPatients are wearing both a conventional blood pressure cuff and the ClearSight finger cuff blood pressure monitoring system. Only measures from the conventional blood pressure cuff are sent/received by the clinical staff in the central and local nursing and anesthesia staff areas. The ClearSight monitoring system data is collected but not used by the clinical staff team for hypotensive monitoring.
ClearSight Monitoring
EXPERIMENTALPatients are wearing both a conventional blood pressure cuff and the ClearSight finger cuff blood pressure monitoring system. Measures from BOTH the conventional blood pressure cuff and ClearSight monitoring system are sent/received by the clinical staff in the central and local nursing and anesthesia staff areas. ClearSight monitoring will add additional information regarding hypotensive events for clinical staff to respond to.
Interventions
Continuous blood pressure monitoring for precision hypotensive event response
Blood pressure (BP) monitoring using a conventional arm cuff and inflation after epidural anesthesia as standard procedure. Standard of care blood pressure monitoring includes measurement of blood pressure at the time of epidural test dose delivery, 3-minute cycles of BP monitoring for 30 minutes after epidural placement, and then BP monitoring every 15 minutes per existing clinical standards for at least 4-hours, or until delivery.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant
- Age ≥ 18 years of age
- Planning vaginal delivery
- Receiving epidural labor analgesia (ELA)
You may not qualify if:
- Non-reassuring fetal tracing at the time of ELA request
- Contraindications to ELA
- Significant cardiac arrhythmias or aortic regurgitation
- Arrhythmia
- Treatment with antihypertensive medications
- Pre-eclampsia with or without severe features
- Preoperative infection
- Inability to use ClearSight device for any reason
- Non-English fluency
- Sustains unintentional dural puncture
- Incomplete data
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Grace Lim, MD, MSlead
- Edwards Lifesciencescollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Magee Womens Hospital of UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Katherine Grace Lim
- Organization
- UPMC, University of Pittsburgh
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Grace Lim, MD, MSc
University of Pittsburgh
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants will wear both a conventional blood pressure cuff and the ClearSight finger cuff throughout the duration of the 4-hours post-epidural placement.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Chief Obstetric & Women's Anesthesiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2023
First Posted
June 15, 2023
Study Start
April 18, 2024
Primary Completion
August 29, 2024
Study Completion
August 29, 2024
Last Updated
November 4, 2025
Results First Posted
November 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share