NCT05891535

Brief Summary

Objective: To investigate perioperative and mid-term functional outcomes of stentless FloRIN reconfiguration as compared to standard technique performed with ureteral mono J placement. Patient and dataset Clinical and surgical data of all consecutive patients treated at our Institution from January 2021 to February 2022 with RARC, lymph node dissection (LND) and FloRIN reconfiguration were gathered in this single institution randomized 1:1 prospective series. All patients with clinical stage T1-T4N0-N1M0 amenable to radical cystectomy with curative intent and FloRIN reconfiguration were included. The sample size for a non-inferiority trial was calculated for different endpoints. Preoperative work-up included chest and abdomen contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan. Main exclusion criteria were: 1) presence of one or multiple tumor metastases at preoperative staging; 2) histopathological confirmation of bladder tumor at the level of prostatic urethra; 3) treatment without curative intent (cT4b, salvage or palliative cystectomies); 4) presence of urethral stricture. After preliminary multidisciplinary evaluation, patients were randomly assigned with 1:1 ratio to the mono-J stent placement or the stentless group. For the present study, only patients with a minimum 6 month-follow up were evaluated. Patient demographics, including ASA score and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), peri- and postoperative features including operative time, conversion rate, estimated blood loss (EBL), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain intensity scale, length of hospital stay (LOS) early (≤30 days) and delayed (\>30 days) complications rate, and pathological data were thoroughly gathered. Follow-up schedule included blood analysis and CT scan performed three months after surgery, then every 6 months from the first to the third postoperative year, followed by annual imaging assessment according to individual risk profile, as postulated by the EAU guidelines. In case of newly diagnosed postoperative hydronephrosis, only patients with grade \> 2 or symptomatic were assessed as functional failure. All eligible patients were offered the possibility to undergo neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy before RARC. Patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, cN+ disease and those presenting with severe cardiovascular morbidity or high preoperative creatinine levels, strongly contraindicating cisplatin administration, underwent immediate radical cystectomy. The enhanced recovery after surgery protocol (ERAS) was regularly applied. Suitable patients underwent a nutritional assessment with a specific immune-nutrition, 7 days preoperatively.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
63

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2021

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 24, 2023

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 7, 2023

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

June 7, 2023

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

May 24, 2023

Last Update Submit

June 3, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mid term complications

    Mid term complications rate

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Preoperative complications

    7 days

Study Arms (2)

Stentless FloRIN

EXPERIMENTAL

Florence robotic Intra Corporeal Neobladder configuration was performed without the employement of Mono J ureteral catheters

Procedure: Robot assisted radical cystectomy without mono J ureteral stent placement

Stented FloRIN

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Florence robotic Intra Corporeal Neobladder configuration was performed with the employement of Mono J ureteral catheters

Procedure: Robot assisted radical cystectomy with mono J ureteral stent placement

Interventions

Robot assisted radical cystectomy with/without ureteral mono J stent placement during uretero-neobladder anastomosis

Stentless FloRIN

Robot assisted radical cystectomy with/without ureteral mono J stent placement during uretero-neobladder anastomosis

Stented FloRIN

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with diagnosed Bladder Cancer with clinical stage T1-T4N0-N1M0
  • Patients amenable to radical cystectomy with eligible to orthotopic neobladder reconfiguration curative intent and FloRIN reconfiguration were included.

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of one or multiple tumor metastases at preoperative staging
  • Histopathological confirmation of bladder tumor at the level of prostatic urethra; - Treatment without curative intent (cT4b, salvage or palliative cystectomies)
  • Presence of urethral stricture

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Careggi hospital

Florence, 50134, Italy

RECRUITING

Related Publications (26)

  • Ahmed K, Khan SA, Hayn MH, Agarwal PK, Badani KK, Balbay MD, Castle EP, Dasgupta P, Ghavamian R, Guru KA, Hemal AK, Hollenbeck BK, Kibel AS, Menon M, Mottrie A, Nepple K, Pattaras JG, Peabody JO, Poulakis V, Pruthi RS, Redorta JP, Rha KH, Richstone L, Saar M, Scherr DS, Siemer S, Stoeckle M, Wallen EM, Weizer AZ, Wiklund P, Wilson T, Woods M, Khan MS. Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.042. Epub 2013 Oct 9.

    PMID: 24183419BACKGROUND
  • Dell'Oglio P, Mazzone E, Lambert E, Vollemaere J, Goossens M, Larcher A, Van Der Jeugt J, Devos G, Poelaert F, Uvin P, Collins J, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P, D'Hondt F, Mottrie A. The Effect of Surgical Experience on Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes After Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion: Evidence from a Referral Centre with Extensive Experience in Robotic Surgery. Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Mar;7(2):352-358. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.01.016. Epub 2020 Feb 13.

    PMID: 32061537BACKGROUND
  • McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, Flum DR, Glasziou P, Marshall JC, Nicholl J; Balliol Collaboration; Aronson JK, Barkun JS, Blazeby JM, Boutron IC, Campbell WB, Clavien PA, Cook JA, Ergina PL, Feldman LS, Flum DR, Maddern GJ, Nicholl J, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Strasberg SM, Meakins JL, Ashby D, Black N, Bunker J, Burton M, Campbell M, Chalkidou K, Chalmers I, de Leval M, Deeks J, Ergina PL, Grant A, Gray M, Greenhalgh R, Jenicek M, Kehoe S, Lilford R, Littlejohns P, Loke Y, Madhock R, McPherson K, Meakins J, Rothwell P, Summerskill B, Taggart D, Tekkis P, Thompson M, Treasure T, Trohler U, Vandenbroucke J. No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1105-12. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8.

    PMID: 19782876BACKGROUND
  • Minervini A, Vanacore D, Vittori G, Milanesi M, Tuccio A, Siena G, Campi R, Mari A, Gavazzi A, Carini M. Florence robotic intracorporeal neobladder (FloRIN): a new reconfiguration strategy developed following the IDEAL guidelines. BJU Int. 2018 Feb;121(2):313-317. doi: 10.1111/bju.14077. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

    PMID: 29140596BACKGROUND
  • Di Maida F, Grosso AA, Tasso G, Gemma L, Lambertini L, Nardoni S, Mari A, Tuccio A, Vittori G, Masieri L, Minervini A. Robot assisted radical cystectomy with Florence Robotic Intracorporeal Neobladder (FloRIN): Functional and urodynamic features compared with a contemporary series of open Vescica Ileale Padovana (VIP). Eur J Surg Oncol. 2022 Aug;48(8):1854-1861. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.04.007. Epub 2022 Apr 20.

    PMID: 35484043BACKGROUND
  • Minervini A, Di Maida F, Tasso G, Mari A, Bossa R, Sforza S, Grosso AA, Tellini R, Vittori G, Siena G, Tuccio A, Masieri L, Carini M. Robot assisted radical cystectomy with Florence robotic intracorporeal neobladder (FloRIN): Analysis of survival and functional outcomes after first 100 consecutive patients upon accomplishment of phase 3 IDEAL framework. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;47(10):2651-2657. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 15.

    PMID: 34023169BACKGROUND
  • Beano H, He J, Hensel C, Worrilow W, Townsend W, Gaston K, Clark PE, Riggs S. Safety of decreasing ureteral stent duration following radical cystectomy. World J Urol. 2021 Feb;39(2):473-479. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03191-2. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

    PMID: 32303901BACKGROUND
  • Scotland KB, Lo J, Grgic T, Lange D. Ureteral stent-associated infection and sepsis: pathogenesis and prevention: a review. Biofouling. 2019 Jan;35(1):117-127. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2018.1562549. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

    PMID: 30732463BACKGROUND
  • Peng YL, Ning K, Wu ZS, Li ZY, Deng MH, Xiong LB, Yu CP, Zhang ZL, Liu ZW, Lu HM, Zhou FJ. Ureteral stents cannot decrease the incidence of ureteroileal anastomotic stricture and leakage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2021 Sep;93:106058. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106058. Epub 2021 Aug 18.

    PMID: 34416355BACKGROUND
  • Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.

    PMID: 3558716BACKGROUND
  • Joyce CR, Zutshi DW, Hrubes V, Mason RM. Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1975 Aug 14;8(6):415-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00562315.

    PMID: 1233242BACKGROUND
  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

    PMID: 15273542BACKGROUND
  • Witjes JA, Bruins HM, Cathomas R, Comperat EM, Cowan NC, Gakis G, Hernandez V, Linares Espinos E, Lorch A, Neuzillet Y, Rouanne M, Thalmann GN, Veskimae E, Ribal MJ, van der Heijden AG. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines. Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):82-104. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.055. Epub 2020 Apr 29.

    PMID: 32360052BACKGROUND
  • Stangl-Kremser J, Lambertini L, Di Maida F, Martinez-Fundichely A, Ferro M, Pradere B, Soria F, Albisinni S, Wu Z, Del Giudice F, Cacciamani GE, Valerio M, Briganti A, Roupret M, Shariat SF, Lee C, Minervini A, Moschini M, Mari A; European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Urothelial Carcinoma Working Group. Enhancing Recovery After Major Bladder Cancer Surgery: Comprehensive Review and Assessment of Application of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guidelines. Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Nov;8(6):1622-1626. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.004. Epub 2022 Jun 27.

    PMID: 35773181BACKGROUND
  • Hussein AA, Elsayed AS, Aldhaam NA, Jing Z, Peabody JO, Wijburg CJ, Wagner A, Canda AE, Khan MS, Scherr D, Schanne F, Maatman TJ, Kim E, Mottrie A, Aboumohamed A, Gaboardi F, Pini G, Kaouk J, Yuh B, Rha KH, Hemal A, Palou Redorta J, Badani K, Saar M, Stockle M, Richstone L, Roupret M, Balbay D, Dasgupta P, Menon M, Guru KA. A comparative propensity score-matched analysis of perioperative outcomes of intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. BJU Int. 2020 Aug;126(2):265-272. doi: 10.1111/bju.15083. Epub 2020 May 16.

    PMID: 32306494BACKGROUND
  • Mastroianni R, Ferriero M, Tuderti G, Anceschi U, Bove AM, Brassetti A, Misuraca L, Zampa A, Torregiani G, Ghiani E, Giannarelli D, Guaglianone S, Gallucci M, Simone G. Open Radical Cystectomy versus Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy with Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion: Early Outcomes of a Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial. J Urol. 2022 May;207(5):982-992. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002422. Epub 2022 Feb 2.

    PMID: 34986007BACKGROUND
  • Cacciamani GE, De Marco V, Sebben M, Rizzetto R, Cerruto MA, Porcaro AB, Gill IS, Artibani W. Robot-assisted Vescica Ileale Padovana: A New Technique for Intracorporeal Bladder Replacement Reproducing Open Surgical Principles. Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):381-390. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.037. Epub 2018 Nov 30.

    PMID: 30509764BACKGROUND
  • Balbay MD, Canda AE, Kiremit MC, Koseoglu E. Intracorporeal Studer Pouch Formation with Balbay's Technique Following Robotic Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Experience with 22 Cases with Oncologic and Functional Outcomes. J Endourol. 2020 Mar;34(3):273-280. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0559. Epub 2020 Mar 3.

    PMID: 31731881BACKGROUND
  • Tan WP, Whelan P, Deane LA. Intentional Omission of Ureteral Stents During Robotic-assisted Intracorporeal Ureteroenteric Anastomosis: Is It Safe and Feasible? Urology. 2017 Apr;102:116-120. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.01.014. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

    PMID: 28111222BACKGROUND
  • Ramahi YO, Shiekh M, Shah AA, Houenstein H, Ely HB, Shabir U, Jing Z, Li Q, Hussein AA, Guru KA. Uretero-enteric Strictures After Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Prevalence and Management Over Two Decades. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2023 Apr;21(2):e19-e26. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Oct 12.

    PMID: 36372690BACKGROUND
  • Carbonara U, Crocerossa F, Mehrazin R, Campi R, Marchioni M, Morlacco A, Paglairulo V, Wu Z, Autorino R, Stein RJ, Eun D, Ditonno P, Dal Moro F. Robotic ureteral reimplantation: systematic review and pooled analysis of comparative outcomes in adults. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2022 Apr;74(2):161-168. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04558-4. Epub 2022 Feb 11.

    PMID: 35147383BACKGROUND
  • Wilson TG, Guru K, Rosen RC, Wiklund P, Annerstedt M, Bochner BH, Chan KG, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Murphy D, Novara G, Peabody JO, Palou Redorta J, Skinner EC, Thalmann G, Stenzl A, Yuh B, Catto J; Pasadena Consensus Panel. Best practices in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary reconstruction: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):363-75. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Jan 9.

    PMID: 25582930BACKGROUND
  • Tomer N, Garden E, Small A, Palese M. Ureteral Stent Encrustation: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Management and Current Technology. J Urol. 2021 Jan;205(1):68-77. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001343. Epub 2020 Aug 28.

    PMID: 32856981BACKGROUND
  • Aldhaam NA, Hussein AA, Elsayed AS, Jing Z, Osei J, Kurbiel Z, Babar T, Khan S, Nagra A, Segal B, Li Q, Guru KA. Detailed Analysis of Urinary Tract Infections After Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy. J Endourol. 2021 Jan;35(1):62-70. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0316. Epub 2020 Nov 6.

    PMID: 32664741BACKGROUND
  • Sasaki Y, Takahashi M, Fukuta K, Shiozaki K, Daizumoto K, Ozaki K, Ueno Y, Tsuda M, Kusuhara Y, Fukawa T, Yamamoto Y, Yamaguchi K, Izaki H, Kanda K, Kanayama H. The patient-side surgeon plays a key role in facilitating robot-assisted intracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion in men. J Robot Surg. 2022 Apr;16(2):437-444. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01256-x. Epub 2021 Jun 3.

    PMID: 34081290BACKGROUND
  • Tan TW, Nair R, Saad S, Thurairaja R, Khan MS. Safe transition from extracorporeal to intracorporeal urinary diversion following robot-assisted cystectomy: a recipe for reducing operative time, blood loss and complication rates. World J Urol. 2019 Feb;37(2):367-372. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2386-4. Epub 2018 Jun 22.

    PMID: 29934671BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Andrea Minervini, Prof.

    University of Florence

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Andrea Minervini, Prof.

CONTACT

Luca Lambertini, Dr

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2023

First Posted

June 7, 2023

Study Start

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion

January 1, 2024

Study Completion

January 1, 2024

Last Updated

June 7, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations