Hysterectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Versus or Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
vNOTESHC
vNOTEsHC: Hysterectomy by Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Versus or Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
200
1 country
6
Brief Summary
In France, there are approximately 62,000 hysterectomies per year, 70% of which are benign. It is the most frequent surgical procedure in gynecology. Hysterectomies are performed via 3 routes: laparotomy, laparoscopy or vaginal route. This choice of approach is particularly important in the case of large uteri (50% of uteri \> 280g), which increase the risks of laparoconversion and bladder injury (NP3). The vaginal route reduces the operating time and postoperative pain. Laparoscopy allows a better anatomical view and easier access to the neighbouring organs, which makes it the preferred approach, especially for young surgeons and when the uterus is large. However, the laparoscopic route is associated with an increase in the rate of conversion to laparotomy according to the volume of the uterus, as well as the rate of general per and postoperative complications compared with vaginal hysterectomy for uteri \> 280 g. In a meta-analysis comparing laparoscopy and vaginal hysterectomy, the total prevalence of perioperative complications according to the classification of Clavien and Dindo was 27%. For large uteruses, complications by the vaginal route amounted to 15% and those by the laparoscopic route to 37.5%. The data are not sufficient to give preference to one or other of the approaches, but for benign pathologies, for large uteri (\>280 g), the minimally invasive laparoscopic or vaginal approaches are recommended by the CNGOF (grade C). A new Medical Device (MD), the vNOTES (Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopy System) offers the advantage of two approaches for pelvic surgery by allowing minimally invasive surgery to be performed by endoscopy through the vagina, offering perfect vision for the assistants and the operator and without scarring. Two randomized trials have shown that vNOTES allows, compared to laparoscopy, to perform adnexectomies and hysterectomies without conversion with less pain, fewer postoperative complications and a shorter hospitalization time. The first evaluations of vNOTES are encouraging and suggest a new era for pelvic surgery: less postoperative pain, fewer complications and facilitation of ambulatory care. Also the videoscopic assistance of the vNOTES is a pedagogical tool for the vaginal route because the field of vision is no longer limited to the operator alone. However, the vNOTES has only been evaluated by the developers of the tool, in monocentric studies and in small numbers. The hysterectomy study evaluated only 35 patients with vNOTES, half of whom had a uterus of less than 280 g. The benefit of vNOTES for uteri smaller than 280 g is not obvious because of the ease of the surgical procedure and the cost of the "classic" vaginal route. Our study would be the first multicentric and academic study on vNOTES to focus specifically on large volume uteri, the most difficult to operate and prone to postoperative complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2024
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 4, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 23, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2026
November 26, 2025
November 1, 2025
1.4 years
May 4, 2023
November 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patient with complications
The proportion of patients with at least one pre- and post-operative complication at 6 weeks will be estimated along with its 95% confidence interval in each surgical strategy group. The primary endpoint is a composite endpoint including the occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications within 6 weeks of surgery. Postoperative complications were Infectious complications, Bleeding complications and All hospital readmissions related to the procedure Postoperative complications will be classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification Intraoperative complications will be defined as : * wounds of nearby organs (bladder, ureters, rectum, colon, small intestine) * and bleeding defined as bleeding requiring immediate resumption, intraoperative transfusion and/or decreasing the patient's hemoglobin by more than 2 points compared to the last known preoperative blood sample
From surgery to 6 weeks of surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Conversion
During surgery
Other Outcomes (6)
Post-operative pain
From surgery to 3 hours of surgery
Short-term postoperative pain
From surgery to 1 week after surgery
Duration of postoperative reflex ileus
Day 0
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
laparoscopic hysterectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORLaparoscopic Hysterectomy will be performed in a standardized manner with or without surgical robot
natural vaginal orifice transluminal endoscopic system for hysterectomies (vNOTES)
EXPERIMENTALVaginal hysterectomy will be performed in a standardized manner using transluminal endoscopic system
Interventions
hysterectomy via the vaginal approach by vNOTES (natural vaginal orifice transluminal endoscopic system for hysterectomies)
laparoscopic hysterectomy uses a standardized procedure with or without surgical robot
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Any woman received in preoperative consultation in the Gynecology-Obstetrics Department for a benign pathology of a uterus estimated to be large requiring a hysterectomy.
- Patient affiliated or entitled to a social security system
- Patients over 18 years of age
- Patients having given their agreement to participate and after signing the consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Woman refusing to participate in the study (lack of consent)
- Non-French speaking woman (unable to conduct a good quality interview of the pregnant woman)
- Participation in another interventional study.
- Patient subject to a legal protection measure or unable to express her consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
HFME - Hospices Civils de Lyon
Bron, 69677, France
CHU Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France
Ch Issoire
Issoire, 63500, France
CHU LIMOGES - Hôpital de la mère et de l'Enfant
Limoges, 87042, France
CHU Saint-Etienne
Saint-Etienne, 42055, France
Clinique Mutualiste de Saint-Etienne
Saint-Etienne, 42100, France
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Céline CHAULEUR, PhD
CHU SAINT-ETIENNE
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 4, 2023
First Posted
June 1, 2023
Study Start
December 23, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Last Updated
November 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share