NCT03373513

Brief Summary

robotic single site surgery (R-SSH) is a novel technique, which may be superior to conventional multiport hysterectomy in select patients regarding cosmesis and postoperative pain. We, perform a randomized trial to compare R-SSH with multiport laparoscopic hysterectomy with regard to the postoperative rehabilitation, cosmesis, the operational cost, and the perioperative morbidity.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2019

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 7, 2017

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 14, 2017

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2019

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2022

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

October 16, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

December 7, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 14, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Return-to-work, Visual analogue pain score, Cosmesis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Return-to-work

    Time from operation to return work

    up to six months after operation or until work is resumed, whichever came first

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain measured by subjective score

    Visual analogue pain score first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and six months after operation

Study Arms (2)

Robotic single-site hysterectomy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Robotic single-site hysterectomy is performed in this arm

Procedure: Robotic single-site Hysterectomy

Multiport Laparoscopy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Multiport Laparoscopic hysterectomy is performed in this other arm

Procedure: Laparoscopic hysterectomy

Interventions

Robotic assisted Periumbilical single incision hysterectomy

Robotic single-site hysterectomy

Multiport laparoscopic hysterectomy

Multiport Laparoscopy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility Detailswomen undergoing hysterectomy
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • hysterectomy on benign indication,
  • American Society of Anesthetists group 1 or 2,
  • BMI less than 35 kg/m2
  • uterine size less than 300 g estimated by ultrasound, using Ferraris formula.

You may not qualify if:

  • adhesions
  • prior extensive abdominal surgery
  • prior midline incision,
  • cutis laxa of abdomen surgery
  • endometriosis
  • more than 1 cesarean section
  • malignant disease

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Gynecology Dept. Herning Hospital

Herning, 7400, Denmark

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • El Hachem L, Andikyan V, Mathews S, Friedman K, Poeran J, Shieh K, Geoghegan M, Gretz HF 3rd. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 15.

    PMID: 26992935BACKGROUND
  • Golkar FC, Ross SB, Sperry S, Vice M, Luberice K, Donn N, Morton C, Hernandez JM, Rosemurgy AS. Patients' perceptions of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: the cosmetic effect. Am J Surg. 2012 Nov;204(5):751-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.026.

    PMID: 23140831BACKGROUND
  • Sandberg EM, la Chapelle CF, van den Tweel MM, Schoones JW, Jansen FW. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1089-1103. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4323-y. Epub 2017 Mar 29.

    PMID: 28357561BACKGROUND
  • Yeung PP Jr, Bolden CR, Westreich D, Sobolewski C. Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.008.

    PMID: 23312246BACKGROUND
  • Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.

    PMID: 26264829BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Motor ActivityPainWounds and Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

BehaviorNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Finn F Lauszus, MD,PhD

    Gynecology Department, Herning Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Women are randomized to either robotic single site or multi port lapsoscopic hystrectomy
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Specialist, Senoir Consultant, Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2017

First Posted

December 14, 2017

Study Start

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion

January 1, 2022

Study Completion

December 1, 2022

Last Updated

October 16, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Locations