Study Stopped
hospital never sterted on single site laparoscopy
Robotic-assisted Hysterectomy: Single- vs. Multi-port Laparoscopic Access
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
robotic single site surgery (R-SSH) is a novel technique, which may be superior to conventional multiport hysterectomy in select patients regarding cosmesis and postoperative pain. We, perform a randomized trial to compare R-SSH with multiport laparoscopic hysterectomy with regard to the postoperative rehabilitation, cosmesis, the operational cost, and the perioperative morbidity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Feb 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 7, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedOctober 16, 2024
October 1, 2024
2.9 years
December 7, 2017
October 14, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Return-to-work
Time from operation to return work
up to six months after operation or until work is resumed, whichever came first
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pain measured by subjective score
Visual analogue pain score first, second, third, fourth, fifth, and six months after operation
Study Arms (2)
Robotic single-site hysterectomy
ACTIVE COMPARATORRobotic single-site hysterectomy is performed in this arm
Multiport Laparoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORMultiport Laparoscopic hysterectomy is performed in this other arm
Interventions
Robotic assisted Periumbilical single incision hysterectomy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- hysterectomy on benign indication,
- American Society of Anesthetists group 1 or 2,
- BMI less than 35 kg/m2
- uterine size less than 300 g estimated by ultrasound, using Ferraris formula.
You may not qualify if:
- adhesions
- prior extensive abdominal surgery
- prior midline incision,
- cutis laxa of abdomen surgery
- endometriosis
- more than 1 cesarean section
- malignant disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Herning Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
Gynecology Dept. Herning Hospital
Herning, 7400, Denmark
Related Publications (5)
El Hachem L, Andikyan V, Mathews S, Friedman K, Poeran J, Shieh K, Geoghegan M, Gretz HF 3rd. Robotic Single-Site and Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Clinical Outcomes and Cost Analysis of a Matched Case-Control Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
PMID: 26992935BACKGROUNDGolkar FC, Ross SB, Sperry S, Vice M, Luberice K, Donn N, Morton C, Hernandez JM, Rosemurgy AS. Patients' perceptions of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: the cosmetic effect. Am J Surg. 2012 Nov;204(5):751-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.026.
PMID: 23140831BACKGROUNDSandberg EM, la Chapelle CF, van den Tweel MM, Schoones JW, Jansen FW. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1089-1103. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4323-y. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
PMID: 28357561BACKGROUNDYeung PP Jr, Bolden CR, Westreich D, Sobolewski C. Patient preferences of cosmesis for abdominal incisions in gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.09.008.
PMID: 23312246BACKGROUNDAarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.
PMID: 26264829BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Finn F Lauszus, MD,PhD
Gynecology Department, Herning Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Specialist, Senoir Consultant, Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 7, 2017
First Posted
December 14, 2017
Study Start
February 1, 2019
Primary Completion
January 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
October 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10