Feasibility Trial of an Online Course (eMB) to Reduce Anxiety and Depression for Pregnant Women and Their Partners
A Pilot Feasibility Trial of the Online Mothers and Babies Course (eMB): Improving Perinatal Mental Health for Pregnant Women and Their Partners
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This pilot study engaged pregnant couples experiencing elevated symptoms of maternal anxiety or depression with an existing online psychoeducation intervention, the Online Mothers and Babies Course (eMB). The study had three primary aims to assess overall feasibility; 1) explore the feasibility of delivering eMB to couples by assessing recruitment, retainment, and adherence, 2) examine eMB's preliminary efficacy for reducing PMAD symptoms, and 3) describe participants' satisfaction and perceptions about eMB acceptability. The intervention group received the 8-week eMB and the control group received an informational resources sheet.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 27, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2023
CompletedMay 22, 2023
May 1, 2023
7 months
April 27, 2023
May 10, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
The GAD-7 has seven self-reported items assessing general anxiety levels and has good reliability (α =.89). The responses are scored zero to three based on symptom severity, and the sum of all items ranges from zero to 21. A score of five, 10, and 15 are cut points for mild, moderate, and severe anxiety. (Spitzer et al.2006)
Change between baseline, week 4 and 8
Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS)
The EPDS is a ten-item self-reported questionnaire validated for use in pregnancy, acceptable for use with partners, and found to have good reliability (α = .87). The item responses are scored from zero to three to indicate symptom severity, and three questions are reverse-scored. A total score ranges from zero to 30. A score of ten or more indicates moderate symptom severity and is considered the optimal cut-off for further assessment or intervention.(Murry and Cox, 1990)
Change between baseline, week 4 and 8
Implementation feasibility
For feasibility measures, we used study tracking data and Qualtrics usage analytics; these include recruitment, retention and attrition rates, and participant intervention adherence. The recruitment rate is the proportion of study inquiries and enrollments. Retention is the portion of survey completions and the reminders at each measurement time for each person. Attrition is the proportion of enrolled dyads and dropouts (i.e., both members failed to complete the final two surveys).
Upon trial completion
Intervention adherence
Intervention adherence is the average number of participants completing one lesson per week, the proportion of fully or partially complete lessons, and the average total lessons visited. An additional descriptive usage measure was captured with a multiple-option survey item asking whether the participant used eMB alone, together with their counterparts, a combination of alone and together, or not at all.
Upon trial completion
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
The CSQ-8 is a 4-point Likert scale with responses ranging from strongly disagree to agree strongly and is sum-scored from eight to 32. A score from eight to 13 is interpreted as "poor," 14-19 as "fair," 20-25 as "good," and 26-32 as "excellent" satisfaction. The scale has high internal consistency (α = .9) and is used routinely in healthcare research (Attkisson \& Greenfield, 1995). Satisfaction and program acceptability are also measured qualitatively using semi-structured interviews. Questions included prompts about the helpfulness of materials, ease of use, areas for improvement, and how the course improved coping behaviors.(Attkisson \& Zwick, 1982)
week 8
Study Arms (2)
Treatment
EXPERIMENTALTreatment group participants received the eMB intervention during the 8-week trial period.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group received a PDF community resources informational sheet, also available to the intervention group via the eMB program.
Interventions
The eMB is an online, asynchronous, self-administered intervention modeled after the efficacious and in-person Mothers and Babies Course. (4) The eight-week course includes psychoeducational modules containing YouTube videos, vignettes, interactive quizzes, homework, guided meditations, and downloadable resources that teach strategies to promote a healthy outcome for mothers and their newborns: 1) overview, 2) thoughts and my mood, 3) fighting harmful and increasing helpful thoughts, 4) activities and my mood, 5) pleasant activities help make a healthy reality, 6) contact with others and my mood, 7) planning for the future and graduation, 8) relaxation exercises.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult, cis-gender and heterosexual pregnant people
- Pregnancy between 13- and 30 weeks gestation
- Elevated symptoms of pregnancy anxiety or depression (i.e., above the cut-off of 10 with validated measures - the Patient Health Questionaire-9 (PHQ-9; 33) or the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7; 29)
- Enrolled as a couple with the pregnant person and their partner cohabitating in Missouri and having internet access
You may not qualify if:
- Endorsed suicide risk,
- Could not comprehend the consent document
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Missouri
Columbia, Missouri, 65211, United States
Related Publications (8)
Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016 Jun;25(3):1057-73. doi: 10.1177/0962280215588241. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
PMID: 26092476BACKGROUNDKroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
PMID: 11556941BACKGROUNDSpitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
PMID: 16717171BACKGROUNDR. F. Muñoz, H.-N. Le, C. G. Ippen, M. A. Diaz, G. G. Urizar Jr, J. Soto, et al. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice 2007 Vol. 14 Issue 1 Pages 70-83
BACKGROUNDMoran TE, O'Hara MW. A partner-rating scale of postpartum depression: the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale - Partner (EPDS-P). Arch Womens Ment Health. 2006 Jul;9(4):173-80. doi: 10.1007/s00737-006-0136-x. Epub 2006 Jun 8.
PMID: 16755331BACKGROUNDMurray D, Cox JL. Screening for depression during pregnancy with the Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDDS). J Reprod Infant Psyc. 1990;8(2):99-107.
BACKGROUNDAttkisson CC, Zwick R. The client satisfaction questionnaire. Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann. 1982;5(3):233-7. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(82)90074-x.
PMID: 10259963BACKGROUNDCanfield SM, Canada KE, Rolbiecki AJ, Petroski GF. Feasibility and acceptability of an online mental health intervention for pregnant women and their partners: a mixed method study with a pilot randomized control trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Oct 18;23(1):739. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06031-4.
PMID: 37853333DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Research Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2023
First Posted
May 22, 2023
Study Start
June 1, 2020
Primary Completion
January 8, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
May 22, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05