Testicular Sperm Aspiration (TESA) vs. Microfluidic Sperm Separation (MSS)
TESA vs Zymot
1 other identifier
observational
280
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Normal embryonic development relies on the correct transmission of genetic information, and sperm DNA plays a crucial part in this process. Causes of poor sperm DNA integrity include unhealthy lifestyles such as smoking and exposure to gonadotoxins, as well as, obesity, varicoceles, infections, advanced paternal age and systemic disorders. An increase in DNA fragmentation in sperm has been linked to lower fertilisation rate, poorer quality embryos, lower pregnancy rate, and high miscarriages rate. The best way for sperm selection and processing in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) should be noninvasive and cost-effective. It should also make it possible to identify high-quality spermatozoa and produce more favorable results in terms of pregnancy and live birth rates.7 Meanwhile, the microfluidic sperm separation technology is a less expensive and less invasive alternative. This method allows for the selection of motile sperm that have a normal morphology, low levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and low DFI
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 10, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 19, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2024
CompletedJuly 12, 2024
July 1, 2024
11 months
May 10, 2023
July 10, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Pregnancy Rate
Compare clinical pregnancy rate in couples with high Sperm DNA fragmentation
approximately 8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of utilizable blastocysts obtained
Approximately 20 days
Study Arms (2)
TESA-ICSI
Compare ICSI outcomes with high Sperm DNA fragmentation undergoing TESA (testicular sperm extraction)
Zymot-ICSI
Compare ICSI outcomes with high Sperm DNA fragmentation using microfluidic sperm separation device (Zymot)
Eligibility Criteria
This retrospective study will compare and investigate ICSI outcomes in couples with high sperm DNA fragmentation using either testicular sperm (TESA) or microfluidic sperm separation device (Zymot)
You may qualify if:
- Men with high DNA fragmentation (\>20%) undergoing TESA-ICSI or Zymot-ICSI
You may not qualify if:
- Spouse with advanced maternal age (\> 40 years)
- Egg donation cycle
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Clinique Ovolead
Study Sites (1)
Clinique Ovo
Montreal, Quebec, H4P 2S4, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Armand Zini, MD
Clinique Ovo
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2023
First Posted
May 19, 2023
Study Start
May 10, 2023
Primary Completion
March 30, 2024
Study Completion
May 31, 2024
Last Updated
July 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share