FES and Upper Limb Loading Exercises Outcome Comparison on Hand Function in Spinal Cord Injury Patients
OCONHAND
Effects Of Functional Electrical Stimulation Versus Upper Limb Loading Exercises on Grip Strength,Dexterity and Function in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is conducted to assess the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation Vs limb loading exercises on hand grip strength,dexterity and function in patients with subacute cervical spinal cord injury.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 25, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 18, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 18, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2023
CompletedMay 18, 2023
May 1, 2023
8 months
May 9, 2023
May 9, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Modified Action Research Arm Test
The ARAT has excellent reliability and low ceiling effects. It consists of 4 subtests, including grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement. All tasks were scored on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3, where 0 reflects poor hand function and 3 reflects good hand function (maximum score, 57).
8th week
Hand Held Dynamometry
A small portable device is held by the examiner and placed against the patient's limb .during a maximal isometric contraction. The device can be used to test hand muscle strength efficiently
8th week
9 peg hole test
Nine-Hole Peg Test is administered by asking the client to take the pegs from a container, one by one, and place them into holes on the board as quickly as possible. Participants must then remove the pegs from the holes, one by one, and replace them back into the container.. The number of seconds it takes for the patient to complete the test.
8th week
Study Arms (2)
Functional Electrical Stimulation &upper limb loading exercises
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe group A Will receive functional electrical stimulation and conservative treatment 30-45 min session 5 days per week for 8 weeks.
Functional Electrical Stimulation & Upper Limb Loading Exercises
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe group B will receive upper limb loading exercises and conservative treatment 30-45 min session 5 days per week for 8 weeks.
Interventions
The group A will receive functional electrical stimulation 30-45 min session 5 days per week for 8 weeks.
The group B will receive Upper Limb Loading Exercises 30-45 min session 5 days per week for 8 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with incomplete SCI at neurological level C5-T1 in subacute stage.
- Medically stable
- Able to tolerate the Functional Electrical stimulation without sustained autonomic dysreflexia
- A score greater than 16 in mini-mental test
You may not qualify if:
- Patients taking long term steroids
- patient having pre-existing injury on upper limb or hand
- Patients have had Previous participation in experimental trial for spinal cord injury
- Patients using Currently cardioactive medications
- Individuals who has had Tendon transfers, implanted devices bladder stimulation, chronic intrathecal infusions
- Individuals with Bleeding disorders.
- Amputation of any digit on target hand
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur
Chak Four Hundred Fifty-four, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Related Publications (3)
Anderson KD. Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma. 2004 Oct;21(10):1371-83. doi: 10.1089/neu.2004.21.1371.
PMID: 15672628BACKGROUNDBeekhuizen KS, Field-Fote EC. Massed practice versus massed practice with stimulation: effects on upper extremity function and cortical plasticity in individuals with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005 Mar;19(1):33-45. doi: 10.1177/1545968305274517.
PMID: 15673842BACKGROUNDHilton BJ, Anenberg E, Harrison TC, Boyd JD, Murphy TH, Tetzlaff W. Re-Establishment of Cortical Motor Output Maps and Spontaneous Functional Recovery via Spared Dorsolaterally Projecting Corticospinal Neurons after Dorsal Column Spinal Cord Injury in Adult Mice. J Neurosci. 2016 Apr 6;36(14):4080-92. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3386-15.2016.
PMID: 27053214BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hira jabeen, MS NMPT
Riphah International University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2023
First Posted
May 18, 2023
Study Start
February 25, 2023
Primary Completion
October 18, 2023
Study Completion
October 30, 2023
Last Updated
May 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share