Comparison of Two Different Flap Methods in the Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus Disease
Bilaterally Parallel Elliptic Flap Versus Karydakis Flap in Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
102
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) has been defined as a disease characterized by chronic inflammation and recurrent infections caused by the movement of hair toward the gluteal sulcus. This condition is especially seen in young men and negatively affects the quality of life of patients and prevents them from performing their work and school activities. The treatment options for PSD range from the use of antibiotics alone to reconstructed excision with tissue flaps. Although the optimal surgical treatment option remains controversial, expectations from the ideal surgical treatment include low recurrence and postoperative complication rates, early wound healing, short hospital stay, early return to work, and good cosmetic outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the different flap techniques in the surgical treatment of PSD and evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 16, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 18, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 25, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 10, 2023
CompletedMay 10, 2023
April 1, 2023
7 months
April 30, 2023
April 30, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Time taken to return to work/school
Time to return to work in daily life after surgery
The patients' return to work ranged from 11 to 49 days.
Postoperative pain
The pain scores of the patients were determined on the first postoperative day. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), scored from 1 to 10, was administered to the patients to evaluate their postoperative pain levels.
1 day
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Length of hospital stay
The patients' length of hospital stay ranged from 1 to 4 days.
Recurrence of the disease
43 months
Study Arms (2)
Bilateral Parallel Elliptic Flap
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients operated with the bilateral parallel elliptic flap technique.
Karydakis Flap
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients operated with the karydakis flap technique.
Interventions
Advancement flap techniques in surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Underwent surgery due to pilonidal sinus disease
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a history of previous pilonidal sinus surgery,
- An acute pilonidal abscess,
- immunodeficiency,
- using immunosuppressive drugs,
- refuse to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Atlas Universitylead
Related Publications (21)
Bi S, Sun K, Chen S, Gu J. Surgical procedures in the pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 13;10(1):13720. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70641-7.
PMID: 32792519RESULTDuman K, Girgin M, Harlak A. Prevalence of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease in Turkey. Asian J Surg. 2017 Nov;40(6):434-437. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 May 14.
PMID: 27188235RESULTJohnson EK, Vogel JD, Cowan ML, Feingold DL, Steele SR; Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pilonidal Disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Feb;62(2):146-157. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001237. No abstract available.
PMID: 30640830RESULTKarydakis GE. New approach to the problem of pilonidal sinus. Lancet. 1973 Dec 22;2(7843):1414-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)92803-1. No abstract available.
PMID: 4128725RESULTIesalnieks I, Ommer A, Herold A, Doll D. German National Guideline on the management of pilonidal disease: update 2020. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Dec;406(8):2569-2580. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02060-1. Epub 2021 May 5.
PMID: 33950407RESULTYuksel BC, Berkem H, Ozel H, Hengirmen S. A new surgical method of pilonidal sinus treatment: a bilaterally paralel elliptic fascio-cutaneous advancement flap technique. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2012;113(12):728-31. doi: 10.4149/bll_2012_165.
PMID: 23173633RESULTKeshvari A, Keramati MR, Fazeli MS, Kazemeini A, Nouritaromlou MK. Risk factors for complications and recurrence after the Karydakis flap. J Surg Res. 2016 Jul;204(1):55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.035. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
PMID: 27451868RESULTAlvandipour M, Zamani MS, Ghorbani M, Charati JY, Karami MY. Comparison of Limberg Flap and Karydakis Flap Surgery for the Treatment of Patients With Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Single-Blinded Parallel Randomized Study. Ann Coloproctol. 2019 Dec 31;35(6):313-318. doi: 10.3393/ac.2018.09.27. Epub 2019 May 22.
PMID: 31113167RESULTErkent M, Sahiner IT, Bala M, Kendirci M, Yildirim MB, Topcu R, Bostanoglu S, Dolapci M. Comparison of Primary Midline Closure, Limberg Flap, and Karydakis Flap Techniques in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery. Med Sci Monit. 2018 Dec 11;24:8959-8963. doi: 10.12659/MSM.913248.
PMID: 30531689RESULTSewefy AM, Hassanen A, Atyia AM, Saleh SK. Karydakis Flap With Compressing Tie-over Interrupted Sutures Without Drain versus Standard Karydakis for Treatment of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 May;60(5):514-520. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000784.
PMID: 28383451RESULTAl-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD006213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub3.
PMID: 20091589RESULTSegre D, Pozzo M, Perinotti R, Roche B; Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery. The treatment of pilonidal disease: guidelines of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR). Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Oct;19(10):607-13. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1369-3. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
PMID: 26377583RESULTKeshvari A, Keramati MR, Fazeli MS, Kazemeini A, Meysamie A, Nouritaromlou MK. Karydakis flap versus excision-only technique in pilonidal disease. J Surg Res. 2015 Sep;198(1):260-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.05.039. Epub 2015 May 28.
PMID: 26094093RESULTTokac M, Dumlu EG, Aydin MS, Yalcin A, Kilic M. Comparison of modified Limberg flap and Karydakis flap operations in pilonidal sinus surgery: prospective randomized study. Int Surg. 2015 May;100(5):870-7. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00213.1.
PMID: 26011208RESULTArslan K, Said Kokcam S, Koksal H, Turan E, Atay A, Dogru O. Which flap method should be preferred for the treatment of pilonidal sinus? A prospective randomized study. Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Jan;18(1):29-37. doi: 10.1007/s10151-013-0982-2. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
PMID: 23430349RESULTBali I, Aziret M, Sozen S, Emir S, Erdem H, Cetinkunar S, Irkorucu O. Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 May;70(5):350-5. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2015(05)08. Epub 2015 May 1.
PMID: 26039952RESULTAtes M, Dirican A, Sarac M, Aslan A, Colak C. Short and long-term results of the Karydakis flap versus the Limberg flap for treating pilonidal sinus disease: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg. 2011 Nov;202(5):568-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.10.021. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
PMID: 21788003RESULTCaliskan M, Kosmaz K, Subasi IE, Acar A, Evren I, Bas G, Atayoglu AT. Comparison of Common Surgical Procedures in Non-complicated Pilonidal Sinus Disease, a 7-Year Follow-Up Trial. World J Surg. 2020 Apr;44(4):1091-1098. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05331-1.
PMID: 31848678RESULTBessa SS. Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):491-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828006f7.
PMID: 23478617RESULTHull TL, Wu J. Pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am. 2002 Dec;82(6):1169-85. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(02)00062-2.
PMID: 12516846RESULTTuran UF, Coban S, Akin T, Berkem H, Yuksel BC, Er S. Bilaterally parallel elliptic flap versus Karydakis flap in primary pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jun 23;38(1):176. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04475-w.
PMID: 37351640DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Asst. Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2023
First Posted
May 10, 2023
Study Start
June 16, 2016
Primary Completion
January 18, 2017
Study Completion
January 25, 2020
Last Updated
May 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
- Time Frame
- One year from the date of publication.
All IPD that underlie results in a publication