NCT05851690

Brief Summary

Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) has been defined as a disease characterized by chronic inflammation and recurrent infections caused by the movement of hair toward the gluteal sulcus. This condition is especially seen in young men and negatively affects the quality of life of patients and prevents them from performing their work and school activities. The treatment options for PSD range from the use of antibiotics alone to reconstructed excision with tissue flaps. Although the optimal surgical treatment option remains controversial, expectations from the ideal surgical treatment include low recurrence and postoperative complication rates, early wound healing, short hospital stay, early return to work, and good cosmetic outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the different flap techniques in the surgical treatment of PSD and evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
102

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 16, 2016

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 18, 2017

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 25, 2020

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 30, 2023

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 10, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 10, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

April 30, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 30, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Pilonidal sinus diseaseFlapKarydakisBilaterally parallel elliptic

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Time taken to return to work/school

    Time to return to work in daily life after surgery

    The patients' return to work ranged from 11 to 49 days.

  • Postoperative pain

    The pain scores of the patients were determined on the first postoperative day. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), scored from 1 to 10, was administered to the patients to evaluate their postoperative pain levels.

    1 day

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Length of hospital stay

    The patients' length of hospital stay ranged from 1 to 4 days.

  • Recurrence of the disease

    43 months

Study Arms (2)

Bilateral Parallel Elliptic Flap

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients operated with the bilateral parallel elliptic flap technique.

Procedure: Surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease

Karydakis Flap

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients operated with the karydakis flap technique.

Procedure: Surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease

Interventions

Advancement flap techniques in surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.

Bilateral Parallel Elliptic FlapKarydakis Flap

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Underwent surgery due to pilonidal sinus disease

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a history of previous pilonidal sinus surgery,
  • An acute pilonidal abscess,
  • immunodeficiency,
  • using immunosuppressive drugs,
  • refuse to participate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (21)

  • Bi S, Sun K, Chen S, Gu J. Surgical procedures in the pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 13;10(1):13720. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70641-7.

  • Duman K, Girgin M, Harlak A. Prevalence of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease in Turkey. Asian J Surg. 2017 Nov;40(6):434-437. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.04.001. Epub 2016 May 14.

  • Johnson EK, Vogel JD, Cowan ML, Feingold DL, Steele SR; Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pilonidal Disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Feb;62(2):146-157. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001237. No abstract available.

  • Karydakis GE. New approach to the problem of pilonidal sinus. Lancet. 1973 Dec 22;2(7843):1414-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)92803-1. No abstract available.

  • Iesalnieks I, Ommer A, Herold A, Doll D. German National Guideline on the management of pilonidal disease: update 2020. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Dec;406(8):2569-2580. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-02060-1. Epub 2021 May 5.

  • Yuksel BC, Berkem H, Ozel H, Hengirmen S. A new surgical method of pilonidal sinus treatment: a bilaterally paralel elliptic fascio-cutaneous advancement flap technique. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2012;113(12):728-31. doi: 10.4149/bll_2012_165.

  • Keshvari A, Keramati MR, Fazeli MS, Kazemeini A, Nouritaromlou MK. Risk factors for complications and recurrence after the Karydakis flap. J Surg Res. 2016 Jul;204(1):55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.035. Epub 2016 Apr 23.

  • Alvandipour M, Zamani MS, Ghorbani M, Charati JY, Karami MY. Comparison of Limberg Flap and Karydakis Flap Surgery for the Treatment of Patients With Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Single-Blinded Parallel Randomized Study. Ann Coloproctol. 2019 Dec 31;35(6):313-318. doi: 10.3393/ac.2018.09.27. Epub 2019 May 22.

  • Erkent M, Sahiner IT, Bala M, Kendirci M, Yildirim MB, Topcu R, Bostanoglu S, Dolapci M. Comparison of Primary Midline Closure, Limberg Flap, and Karydakis Flap Techniques in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery. Med Sci Monit. 2018 Dec 11;24:8959-8963. doi: 10.12659/MSM.913248.

  • Sewefy AM, Hassanen A, Atyia AM, Saleh SK. Karydakis Flap With Compressing Tie-over Interrupted Sutures Without Drain versus Standard Karydakis for Treatment of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 May;60(5):514-520. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000784.

  • Al-Khamis A, McCallum I, King PM, Bruce J. Healing by primary versus secondary intention after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;2010(1):CD006213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006213.pub3.

  • Segre D, Pozzo M, Perinotti R, Roche B; Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery. The treatment of pilonidal disease: guidelines of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR). Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Oct;19(10):607-13. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1369-3. Epub 2015 Sep 16.

  • Keshvari A, Keramati MR, Fazeli MS, Kazemeini A, Meysamie A, Nouritaromlou MK. Karydakis flap versus excision-only technique in pilonidal disease. J Surg Res. 2015 Sep;198(1):260-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.05.039. Epub 2015 May 28.

  • Tokac M, Dumlu EG, Aydin MS, Yalcin A, Kilic M. Comparison of modified Limberg flap and Karydakis flap operations in pilonidal sinus surgery: prospective randomized study. Int Surg. 2015 May;100(5):870-7. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00213.1.

  • Arslan K, Said Kokcam S, Koksal H, Turan E, Atay A, Dogru O. Which flap method should be preferred for the treatment of pilonidal sinus? A prospective randomized study. Tech Coloproctol. 2014 Jan;18(1):29-37. doi: 10.1007/s10151-013-0982-2. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

  • Bali I, Aziret M, Sozen S, Emir S, Erdem H, Cetinkunar S, Irkorucu O. Effectiveness of Limberg and Karydakis flap in recurrent pilonidal sinus disease. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 May;70(5):350-5. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2015(05)08. Epub 2015 May 1.

  • Ates M, Dirican A, Sarac M, Aslan A, Colak C. Short and long-term results of the Karydakis flap versus the Limberg flap for treating pilonidal sinus disease: a prospective randomized study. Am J Surg. 2011 Nov;202(5):568-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.10.021. Epub 2011 Jul 23.

  • Caliskan M, Kosmaz K, Subasi IE, Acar A, Evren I, Bas G, Atayoglu AT. Comparison of Common Surgical Procedures in Non-complicated Pilonidal Sinus Disease, a 7-Year Follow-Up Trial. World J Surg. 2020 Apr;44(4):1091-1098. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05331-1.

  • Bessa SS. Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):491-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828006f7.

  • Hull TL, Wu J. Pilonidal disease. Surg Clin North Am. 2002 Dec;82(6):1169-85. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(02)00062-2.

  • Turan UF, Coban S, Akin T, Berkem H, Yuksel BC, Er S. Bilaterally parallel elliptic flap versus Karydakis flap in primary pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jun 23;38(1):176. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04475-w.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pilonidal Sinus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CystsNeoplasms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Asst. Prof.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2023

First Posted

May 10, 2023

Study Start

June 16, 2016

Primary Completion

January 18, 2017

Study Completion

January 25, 2020

Last Updated

May 10, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All IPD that underlie results in a publication

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
Time Frame
One year from the date of publication.