GLUtEus Maximus Fascia Plasty Flap for Pilonidal Sinus
GLUE
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Mobilized Gluteus Maximus Muscle Fascia Flap Versus Primary Closure in the Treatment of Primary and Recurrent Pilonidal Sinus Disease.
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Surgical treatment is still gold standard for pilonidal sinus disease. Several surgical techniques have been proposed to treat this disease in the last two decades. A new method - midline excision of pilonidal sinus and wound closure using gluteus maximus fascia plasty flap (GMFF) - was proposed recently as a new method of treatment that results in low reccurence rate and good cosmetic results. The aim of this study is to compare a new method (GMFF) with a traditional method (midline excision and primary closure) in terms of recurrence rate, complications and patient satisfaction with results.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 11, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2024
CompletedApril 16, 2019
April 1, 2019
2.7 years
April 11, 2019
April 11, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurrence rate
The rate of disease recurrence (clinical picture of pilonidal sinus and/or appearance of new openings in the intergluteal cleft and/or chronic unhealing wound and/or residual cavity in the wound area as confirmed by the soft tissue ultrasound)
starting from 6 months after surgery and up to 5 years after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Operative time
1 day
Bloodloss
1 day
Postoperative pain intensity - early postoperative period
On 1st, 3rd, 5th and 7th postoperative day
Postoperative pain intensity - late postoperative period
On 10th, 14th, 21st, 30 day after surgery
Surgical site infection rate
3 month after surgery
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Primary Closure
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter pilonidal sinus is excised, subcutaneous fat and skin are closed in midline with a running suture
Gluteus Maximus Plasty Flap
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter pilonidal sinus is excised, gluteus maximus fascia flaps will be mobilised, approximated in the midline and fixed with a running suture. Subcutaneous fat and skin are closed in midline with a running suture.
Interventions
A symmetrical elliptical incision of skin and subcutaneous fat around primary and secondary orifices is performed. The cyst is excised en bloc down to the sacral fascia and removed. The lateral edges of the wound are approximated and sutured in the midline: subcutaneous fat - with a running suture, skin - with a separate running suture.
A symmetrical elliptical incision of skin and subcutaneous fat around primary and secondary orifices is performed. The cyst is excised en bloc down to the sacral fascia and removed. The lateral edges of the gluteus maximus muscles fascia bilaterally are mobilised in the direction from the fixation point to the sacrum and for 3-4 cm in lateral direction. The fascia flaps edges are approximated and fixed in the midline with a running suture. The subcutaneous fat is closed with a running suture, skin is closed with a separate running suture.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Written informed consent
- Chronic primary or recurrent pilonidal sinus at the remission stage.
- Presence or absence of secondary orifices.
- Planned surgical treatment with excision of pilonidal sinus.
- Location of secondary orifices less than 2 cm from the natal cleft.
- The distance between bilateral symmetrical secondary orifices less than 2 cm.
- American Society Anesthesiologists (ASA) score 1 to 3
- Acute pilonidal sinus abscess.
- The secondary openings (orifice) position more than 2 cm from the midline.
- ASA 4-5.
- Predictable impossibility of following the protocol.
- Pregnancy
You may not qualify if:
- The patients lost for the further observation. 2. The patient's refusal to continue participate in the investigation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clinic of Colorectal and Minimally Invasive Surgery - I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Moscow, 119435, Russia
Related Publications (5)
Chintapatla S, Safarani N, Kumar S, Haboubi N. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review, pathological insight and surgical options. Tech Coloproctol. 2003 Apr;7(1):3-8. doi: 10.1007/s101510300001.
PMID: 12750948RESULTSondenaa K, Andersen E, Nesvik I, Soreide JA. Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10(1):39-42. doi: 10.1007/BF00337585.
PMID: 7745322RESULTIesalnieks I, Ommer A, Petersen S, Doll D, Herold A. German national guideline on the management of pilonidal disease. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Aug;401(5):599-609. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1463-7. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
PMID: 27311698RESULTMilone M, Velotti N, Manigrasso M, Anoldo P, Milone F, De Palma GD. Long-term follow-up for pilonidal sinus surgery: A review of literature with metanalysis. Surgeon. 2018 Oct;16(5):315-320. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
PMID: 29699781RESULTJohnson EK, Vogel JD, Cowan ML, Feingold DL, Steele SR; Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons' Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pilonidal Disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Feb;62(2):146-157. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001237. No abstract available.
PMID: 30640830RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Inna Tulina, PhD
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Petr Tsarkov, Prof.
Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 11, 2019
First Posted
April 16, 2019
Study Start
April 20, 2017
Primary Completion
December 30, 2019
Study Completion
December 30, 2024
Last Updated
April 16, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04