Comparison of Progressive Motor Imagery and Sensorimotor Exercises in Knee Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Osteoarthritis is the most common type of arthritis, which can affect all joints in the body and includes synovial inflammation, cartilage degeneration, osteophyte formation and bone remodeling in its pathophysiology. Many approaches are used in its treatment, and the effectiveness of exercise in conservative treatment has been proven. Many exercise methods such as strengthening, balance, aquatherapy are applied, but there is no definite consensus on exercise prescribing.Programs that focus on restoring balance and proprioception are called "sensorimotor or neuromuscular trainings". Previous studies have shown that neuromuscular exercises reduce pain, improve function, improve balance, and cause positive biomechanical changes in knee osteoarthritis and meniscus injuries. Progressive Motor Imagery (AMI) is an approach in rehabilitation where the focus is on progressive brain exercise. It is an education that approaches patients with pain, activity limitation and functional loss with a holistic view within the framework of the biopsychosocial model. The aim of this study; to examine the effects of two current treatment programs (AMI, SM training) on symptoms, functionality, balance and proprioception parameters in osteoarthritis rehabilitation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 9, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2024
CompletedJune 13, 2023
June 1, 2023
1.1 years
March 18, 2023
June 10, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Balance
For balance and fall risk assessment, the Biodex Balance System (BBS) (Biodex Medical Systems, Inc. 20 Ramsey Road, Shirley, New York) will be used. Computer result will be used to see falling risk and stability postural problems as anteroposterior and mediolateral. In the evaluation, while the patient stands without shoes on the BBS platform, the patients are asked to place their feet on the marked place, hold the BBS monitor and focus. The patient is asked to keep the cursor on the screen in the smallest circle shown on the device screen for 20 seconds while applying surface movements that can move between 20 and 360 degrees that will disrupt postural stability at different levels (12 most stable, 1 most mobile). Based on previous studies, the static assessment will be assessed at level 12, and the dynamic assessment and risk of falling will be assessed at level 8.
change from baseline to posttreatment 6th weeks , change from posttratment 6th weeks to 12th weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Pain of joint
change from baseline to posttreatment 6th weeks , change from posttratment 6th weeks to 12th week
Proprioception
change from baseline to posttreatment 6th weeks , change from posttratment 6th weeks to 12th week
Other Outcomes (6)
Functional Evaluation
change from baseline to posttreatment 6th weeks , change from posttratment 6th weeks to 12th week
Range of Motion
change from baseline to posttreatment 6th weeks , change from posttratment 6th weeks to 12th week
Cognitive status
only at baseline evaluation for inclusion criteria (MMSE ≥ 24 point)
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Sensorimotor Exercise Training
EXPERIMENTALSensorimotor exercise content has been prepared based on previous sensorimotor, balance and proprioceptive studies in the literature. It is organized as a structured traditional exercise program + SM training content.
Progressive Motor Imagery Training
EXPERIMENTALIn order to sequentially activate the cortical motor networks and improve cortical organization, a literature-supported program including the components of AMI training (first stage laterality training, second stage motor imagery and third stage mirror therapy) was prepared and a six-week structured exercise program suitable for knee joint treatment + AMI training was prepared.
Conventional Exercise Training
ACTIVE COMPARATORA 6-week program was prepared from traditional treatment exercises based on previous studies in knee osteoarthritis. It consists of progressive muscle strengthening of Quadriceps, Hamstrings and gluteals and also stretching exercises.
Interventions
Balance, perturbation , aging and strengthing exercise will be performed for knee
Range of motion, strengthing and stretching exercise will be performed for knee
Different types of exercises will be applied targeting muscle strength, proprioceptive sense or brain neurons for knee
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with knee OA according to the criteria of the American Society of Rheumatology (ACR),
- Stage 2 or 3 according to Kellgren Lawrence radiological staging criteria,
- Between the ages of 50 and 65,
- Body mass index below 35 kg/m²,
- Pain intensity defined by the patient in the last 3 months is at least 3 out of 10 according to NPRS,
- There are no obstacles to being included in the exercise program,
- Patients with a score of at least 24 on the Standardized Mini Mental Test will be included.
You may not qualify if:
- Receiving any physiotherapy program or injection treatment in the last 3 months,
- Having a diagnosis of additional pathology other than OA in the knee, having a history of knee injury / surgery in the past
- Having uncontrollable hypertension, cardiovascular and neurological diseases that will prevent exercise,
- The patient has any vision, hearing or cognitive problems that will prevent him from complying with the treatment,
- Providing ambulation with an assistive device
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ebru Karadüz
Fatih, Istanbul, 34083, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (9)
Busija L, Bridgett L, Williams SR, Osborne RH, Buchbinder R, March L, Fransen M. Osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Dec;24(6):757-68. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2010.11.001.
PMID: 21665124BACKGROUNDFransen M, McConnell S, Harmer AR, Van der Esch M, Simic M, Bennell KL. Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee: a Cochrane systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;49(24):1554-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095424. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
PMID: 26405113BACKGROUNDCross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Nolte S, Ackerman I, Fransen M, Bridgett L, Williams S, Guillemin F, Hill CL, Laslett LL, Jones G, Cicuttini F, Osborne R, Vos T, Buchbinder R, Woolf A, March L. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jul;73(7):1323-30. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
PMID: 24553908BACKGROUNDSharma L. Osteoarthritis of the Knee. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 7;384(1):51-59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1903768. No abstract available.
PMID: 33406330BACKGROUNDZhang W, Doherty M, Peat G, Bierma-Zeinstra MA, Arden NK, Bresnihan B, Herrero-Beaumont G, Kirschner S, Leeb BF, Lohmander LS, Mazieres B, Pavelka K, Punzi L, So AK, Tuncer T, Watt I, Bijlsma JW. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Mar;69(3):483-9. doi: 10.1136/ard.2009.113100. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
PMID: 19762361BACKGROUNDDominguez-Navarro F, Igual-Camacho C, Silvestre-Munoz A, Roig-Casasus S, Blasco JM. Effects of balance and proprioceptive training on total hip and knee replacement rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait Posture. 2018 May;62:68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
PMID: 29525292BACKGROUNDMoseley GL. Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain: a randomized controlled trial. Neurology. 2006 Dec 26;67(12):2129-34. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000249112.56935.32. Epub 2006 Nov 2.
PMID: 17082465BACKGROUNDBaird CL, Sands L. A pilot study of the effectiveness of guided imagery with progressive muscle relaxation to reduce chronic pain and mobility difficulties of osteoarthritis. Pain Manag Nurs. 2004 Sep;5(3):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2004.01.003.
PMID: 15359221BACKGROUNDKolasinski SL, Neogi T, Hochberg MC, Oatis C, Guyatt G, Block J, Callahan L, Copenhaver C, Dodge C, Felson D, Gellar K, Harvey WF, Hawker G, Herzig E, Kwoh CK, Nelson AE, Samuels J, Scanzello C, White D, Wise B, Altman RD, DiRenzo D, Fontanarosa J, Giradi G, Ishimori M, Misra D, Shah AA, Shmagel AK, Thoma LM, Turgunbaev M, Turner AS, Reston J. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hand, Hip, and Knee. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Feb;72(2):149-162. doi: 10.1002/acr.24131. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
PMID: 31908149RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
EBRU KARADÜZ, PhD(c)
İstanbul Medipol University
- STUDY CHAIR
Sena TOLU, Asist Prof
Medipol Mega Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Candan Algun, Prof
İstanbul Medipol University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- participants and the researcher who evaluated the analysis are blind to the study
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physiotherapist (MSc ) / PhD (continous) / Lecturer Ebru Gülek Karadüz
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2023
First Posted
May 9, 2023
Study Start
May 15, 2023
Primary Completion
June 30, 2024
Study Completion
December 30, 2024
Last Updated
June 13, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06