NCT05849363

Brief Summary

The etiology of Goal B type basilar invagination (BI) is still not clear, and it may be related to platybasia and short slope. There is no unified standard surgical strategy for Goal B type BI, and different surgical strategies have a great influence on the surgical results of patients. The purpose of our prospective study in China is to (1) further clarify the etiology of Goal B type BI, and (2) improve the surgical outcome in these patients.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 9, 2022

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 8, 2023

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2023

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 19, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

October 9, 2022

Last Update Submit

July 17, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • JOA Score(Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores)

    Changes in JOA score,from 0 to 17, higher scores means better outcome

    1 months, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively

  • NDI Score

    Changes in NDI score,from 0% to 100%,higher scores means worse outcome

    1 months, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Change of Basilar Invagination

    1 months, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively

  • Change of CCA

    1 months, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively

  • Change of CVJ triangle area

    1 months, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively

  • Change of CMA

    1 months, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively

  • Change of subarachnoid space

    1 months, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively

Study Arms (2)

Posterior fossa decompression

EXPERIMENTAL

Posterior arch of atlas removal, reconstruction of cisterna magna, decompression of cerebellum, detection of magendie foramen.

Procedure: Posterior fossa decompression

Posterior Compression-Distraction-Reduction-Fixation

EXPERIMENTAL

After subperiosteal dissection, the facet joint was exposed. A 2-mm joint "scraper" with sharp edge was inserted into the joint capsule and rotated to remove the articular cartilage. A blunt-edged rotating distractor was then inserted into the joint space, and the facet was sequentially opened with larger and larger blunt rotating distractors. After distraction on one side, an appropriate-sized trial was placed into the contralateral facet, holding the distraction open. This was repeated back and forth with larger trials. These steps were repeated, and the facet joints were distracted up to the pre-planned distance of the odontoid tip above Chamberlain's line.

Procedure: Posterior Compression-Distraction-Reduction-Fixation

Interventions

Posterior fossa decompression:Posterior arch of atlas removal, decompression of cerebellum, detection of foramen magnum.

Posterior fossa decompression

Posterior Compression-Distraction-Reduction-Fixation:After subperiosteal dissection, the facet joint was exposed. A 2-mm joint "scraper" with sharp edge was inserted into the joint capsule and rotated to remove the articular cartilage. A blunt-edged rotating distractor was then inserted into the joint space, and the facet was sequentially opened with larger and larger blunt rotating distractors. After distraction on one side, an appropriate-sized trial was placed into the contralateral facet, holding the distraction open. This was repeated back and forth with larger trials. These steps were repeated, and the facet joints were distracted up to the pre-planned distance of the odontoid tip above Chamberlain's line.

Posterior Compression-Distraction-Reduction-Fixation

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Goal B type basilar invagination (BI)

You may not qualify if:

  • Preoperative diagnosis was confirmed as not Goal B type basilar invagination (BI)
  • The patient was not physically fit for surgery.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Xuanwu Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100000, China

RECRUITING

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2022

First Posted

May 8, 2023

Study Start

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion

June 1, 2025

Study Completion

September 1, 2025

Last Updated

July 19, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Locations