RCT on Telerehabilitation Efficacy in Parkinson's Disease
REPORT
Efficacy of Non-immersive Virtual Reality-based Telerehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease: a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
94
1 country
6
Brief Summary
The implementation of regular prolonged, and effective rehabilitation in people with Parkinson's disease is essential for ensuring a good quality of life. However, the continuity of rehabilitation care may find barriers related to economic, geographic, and social issues. In these scenarios, telerehabilitation could be a possible solution to guarantee the continuity of care. This trial aims to investigate the efficacy of non-immersive virtual reality-based telerehabilitation on postural stability in people with Parkinson's disease, compared to at-home conventional rehabilitation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable parkinson-disease
Started Jul 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable parkinson-disease
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2023
CompletedJune 28, 2023
June 1, 2023
2.5 years
April 24, 2023
June 27, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (mini-BESTest)
The mini-BESTest is a shortened version of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test. It aims to target and identify 6 different balance control systems so that specific rehabilitation approaches can be designed for different balance deficits. The test was shortened based on factor analysis to include dynamic balance only and to improve clinical utilization. It is 36 items scale that evaluates Balance with total score of 28.
Session 1 (Baseline, T0), Session 30 (End of treatment, approximately 10 weeks, T1)]
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in the Timed Up and Go test (TUG)
Session 1 (Baseline, T0), Session 30 (End of treatment, approximately 10 weeks, T1)]
Change in the 6-minute WalkTest (6mWT)
Session 1 (Baseline, T0), Session 30 (End of treatment, approximately 10 weeks, T1)]
Change in the MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) - part III
Session 1 (Baseline, T0), Session 30 (End of treatment, approximately 10 weeks, T1)]
Study Arms (2)
Telerehabilitation Group (TG)
EXPERIMENTALThe TG consisted of 30 sessions lasting approximately 45 minutes (3-5/week for 6-10 weeks) of motor, and cognitive rehabilitation exercises in non-immersive VR-based TR modality using the VRRS Tablet system (Khymeia Srl, Noventa Padovana, Italy).
Control Group (CG)
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe CG carried consisted of 30 sessions lasting approximately 45 minutes (3-5 days/week for, 6-10 weeks) of at-home conventional rehabilitation via structured self-administered exercises without the use of any technological devices.
Interventions
The motor exercises were performed using inertial sensors for the acquisition and processing of the movement performed by the patient. The patient was trained to perform these exercises using visual and auditory feedback in a serious game environment. The exercises were aimed at the rehabilitation of balance and at the improvement of motor performance in lower limbs (e.g., maintaining balance on one leg, marching in place, standing on tiptoe, squatting, etc.). The therapists involved in the study customized the protocol of exercises in TR mode according to the characteristics and needs of the subject.
The CG rehabilitation was an active comparator treatment and consisted of a written home-based self-administered booklet with conventional motor activities tailored for each subject. The motor activities were chosen and adapted from a specialized manual. The motor exercises were aimed at the rehabilitation of balance and at the improvement of motor performance in lower limbs (e.g., maintaining balance on one leg, marching in place, standing on tiptoe, squatting, etc).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Hoehn \& Yahr (H\&Y) score between ≤3 (ON-state);
- the absence of moderate and severe dyskinesias assessed by the MDS-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) with a score of items 4.1 and 4.2 \< 3;
- the absence of moderate and severe freezing episodes assessed by the MDS-UPDRS with a score of items 2.13 and 3.11 \< 3;
- the ability to perform the 6 Minutes Walking Test (6MWT) between 200 m and 600 m;
- age ≤ 80 years;
- the absence of cognitive impairment measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) total score≥17.54 ;
- stabilized drug treatment;
- sufficient cognitive and linguistic level to understand and comply with study procedures;
- sign informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- other neurological pathologies, psychiatric complications, or personality disorders;
- blurred or low vision problems;
- hearing and speech impairment affecting participation in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- IRCCS San Raffaele Romalead
- Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onluscollaborator
- IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino" Foundationcollaborator
- Fondazione Salvatore Maugericollaborator
- IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, Italycollaborator
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejocollaborator
Study Sites (6)
IRCCS Bonino-Pulejo
Messina, Italy
IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS
Milan, Italy
IRCCS Mondino Foundation
Pavia, Italy
IRCCS San Raffaele Roma
Rome, 00166, Italy
IRCCS San Camillo Hospital
Venice, Italy
ICS Maugeri SB IRCCS Veruno
Veruno, Italy
Related Publications (3)
Vellata C, Belli S, Balsamo F, Giordano A, Colombo R, Maggioni G. Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation on Motor Impairments, Non-motor Symptoms and Compliance in Patients With Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review. Front Neurol. 2021 Aug 26;12:627999. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.627999. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34512495BACKGROUNDBarbour PJ, Arroyo J, High S, Fichera LB, Staska-Pier MM, McMahon MK. Telehealth for patients with Parkinson's disease: delivering efficient and sustainable long-term care. Hosp Pract (1995). 2016;44(2):92-7. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2016.1166922.
PMID: 26982525BACKGROUNDCikajlo I, Hukic A, Dolinsek I, Zajc D, Vesel M, Krizmanic T, Blazica B, Biasizzo A, Novak F, Peterlin Potisk K. Can telerehabilitation games lead to functional improvement of upper extremities in individuals with Parkinson's disease? Int J Rehabil Res. 2018 Sep;41(3):230-238. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000291.
PMID: 29757774BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michela Goffredo, PhD
IRCCS San Raffaele Roma
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2023
First Posted
May 6, 2023
Study Start
July 1, 2018
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
June 28, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share