Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Diabetes

NCT05840250 | Terminated

• 1 other identifier: Pro2022-0402
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 10
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The study is a longitudinal single-arm prospective study design. Adult patients who are African American or Hispanic with type 2 diabetes mellitus will be recruited to participate in this study. The goal of the study is to determine if the use of a continuous glucose monitoring system will improve diabetes management in persons from health disparity background. The subjects will be closely monitored for the first 3 months as they utilize the continuous glucose monitor and engage in diabetes education classes. They will then be followed for an additional 3 months to determine if they are able to maintain the same glucose control as experienced for the initial 3 months.

Conditions

Diabetes

Keywords

Glucose Control; Type 2 Diabetes; Continuous Glucose Monitoring; Educational support

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

• A1c - Marker of overall glucose control

  A1c levels measured at 12 weeks post enrollment will be compared to the baseline A1c level (measured at enrollment).

  At 3 months post enrollment

• A1c - Marker of overall glucose control

  A1c levels measured at 24 weeks post enrollment will be compared to the baseline A1c level (measured at enrollment).

  At 6 months post enrollment

• Glycemic control

  To investigate the effect of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) device and educational support on the Glycemic control. Glycemic control will be measured based on the percent time that glucose is on target vs off target. On target is within the normal range of 70-180 mg/dL. Off target includes: \<54 mg/dL (critical low glucose); \< 70 mg/dL (low glucose); \>180 mg/dL (high glucose); and \>250 mg/dL (very high). The range at 12 weeks post enrollment will be compared to the baseline data that will be collected after the first 14 days (2 weeks).

  At 3 months post enrollment

• Glycemic control

  To investigate the effect of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) device and educational support on the Glycemic control. Glycemic control will be measured based on the percent time that glucose is on target vs off target. On target is within the normal range of 70-180 mg/dL. Off target includes: \<54 mg/dL (critical low glucose); \< 70 mg/dL (low glucose); \>180 mg/dL (high glucose); and \>250 mg/dL (very high). The range at 24 weeks post enrollment will be compared to the baseline data that will be collected after the first 14 days (2 weeks).

  At 6 months post enrollment

Secondary Outcomes (10)

• Blood pressure

  At 3 months post enrollment

• Weight

  At 3 months post enrollment

• BMI

  At 3 months post enrollment

• ER visit

  For the 3 months post enrollment

• Hospital admissions

  For the 3 months post enrollment

Study Arms (1)

Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Education Support Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will be provided with a device to monitor their blood glucose (Abbott Free Style Libre2 Flash CGM system) along with educational materials to better understand and manage their diabetes and other supporting services. Pre and post intervention surveys will be implemented. Participants will be closely monitored for 3 months and then followed up for 3 more months for a total of 6-month participation.

Other: Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Education Support

Interventions

Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Education Support OTHER

Participants will be provided with a device to monitor their blood glucose (Abbott Free Style Libre2 Flash CGM system) along with educational materials to better understand and manage their diabetes and other supporting services. Pre and post intervention surveys will be implemented. Participants will be closely monitored for 3 months and then followed up for 3 more months for a total of 6-month participation.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Education Support Group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Adult subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus ≥18 years
• African-American or Hispanic
• with A1c ≥8% to ≤12%

You may not qualify if:

• Patients with type 1 diabetes,
• pregnant,
• End-Stage Renal Disease,
• recent use of any CGM within the last 12 months,
• on steroid therapy and history of adhesive allergy.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Hackensack Meridian Health: lead

Study Sites (1)

Hackensack Univeristy Medical Center

Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601, United States

Location

Related Publications (16)

• Golden SH, Brown A, Cauley JA, Chin MH, Gary-Webb TL, Kim C, Sosa JA, Sumner AE, Anton B. Health disparities in endocrine disorders: biological, clinical, and nonclinical factors--an Endocrine Society scientific statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Sep;97(9):E1579-639. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2043. Epub 2012 Jun 22.

  PMID: 22730516 BACKGROUND

• Hill-Briggs F, Adler NE, Berkowitz SA, Chin MH, Gary-Webb TL, Navas-Acien A, Thornton PL, Haire-Joshu D. Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review. Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov 2;44(1):258-79. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0053. Online ahead of print. No abstract available.

  PMID: 33139407 BACKGROUND

• Bergenstal RM, Kerr MSD, Roberts GJ, Souto D, Nabutovsky Y, Hirsch IB. Flash CGM Is Associated With Reduced Diabetes Events and Hospitalizations in Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes. J Endocr Soc. 2021 Feb 2;5(4):bvab013. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvab013. eCollection 2021 Apr 1.

  PMID: 33644623 BACKGROUND

• Haak T, Hanaire H, Ajjan R, Hermanns N, Riveline JP, Rayman G. Flash Glucose-Sensing Technology as a Replacement for Blood Glucose Monitoring for the Management of Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: a Multicenter, Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Ther. 2017 Feb;8(1):55-73. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0223-6. Epub 2016 Dec 20.

  PMID: 28000140 BACKGROUND

• Vigersky RA, Fonda SJ, Chellappa M, Walker MS, Ehrhardt NM. Short- and long-term effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2012 Jan;35(1):32-8. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1438. Epub 2011 Nov 18.

  PMID: 22100963 BACKGROUND

• Rodriguez JE, Campbell KM. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Prevalence and Care of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2017 Jan;35(1):66-70. doi: 10.2337/cd15-0048. No abstract available.

  PMID: 28144049 BACKGROUND

• Yaron M, Roitman E, Aharon-Hananel G, Landau Z, Ganz T, Yanuv I, Rozenberg A, Karp M, Ish-Shalom M, Singer J, Wainstein J, Raz I. Effect of Flash Glucose Monitoring Technology on Glycemic Control and Treatment Satisfaction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2019 Jul;42(7):1178-1184. doi: 10.2337/dc18-0166. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

  PMID: 31036546 BACKGROUND

• Martens T, Beck RW, Bailey R, Ruedy KJ, Calhoun P, Peters AL, Pop-Busui R, Philis-Tsimikas A, Bao S, Umpierrez G, Davis G, Kruger D, Bhargava A, Young L, McGill JB, Aleppo G, Nguyen QT, Orozco I, Biggs W, Lucas KJ, Polonsky WH, Buse JB, Price D, Bergenstal RM; MOBILE Study Group. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal Insulin: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Jun 8;325(22):2262-2272. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.7444.

  PMID: 34077499 BACKGROUND

• Karter AJ, Parker MM, Moffet HH, Gilliam LK, Dlott R. Association of Real-time Continuous Glucose Monitoring With Glycemic Control and Acute Metabolic Events Among Patients With Insulin-Treated Diabetes. JAMA. 2021 Jun 8;325(22):2273-2284. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6530.

  PMID: 34077502 BACKGROUND

• Haak T, Hanaire H, Ajjan R, Hermanns N, Riveline JP, Rayman G. Use of Flash Glucose-Sensing Technology for 12 months as a Replacement for Blood Glucose Monitoring in Insulin-treated Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2017 Jun;8(3):573-586. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0255-6. Epub 2017 Apr 11.

  PMID: 28401454 BACKGROUND

• Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Earles J, Dudl RJ, Lees J, Mullan J, Jackson RA. Assessing psychosocial distress in diabetes: development of the diabetes distress scale. Diabetes Care. 2005 Mar;28(3):626-31. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.3.626.

  PMID: 15735199 BACKGROUND

• Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Hessler D, Edelman SV. Development of a New Measure for Assessing Glucose Monitoring Device-Related Treatment Satisfaction and Quality of Life. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Sep;17(9):657-63. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0417. Epub 2015 Apr 29.

  PMID: 25923812 BACKGROUND

• Rothman RL, Malone R, Bryant B, Wolfe C, Padgett P, DeWalt DA, Weinberger M, Pignone M. The Spoken Knowledge in Low Literacy in Diabetes scale: a diabetes knowledge scale for vulnerable patients. Diabetes Educ. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):215-24. doi: 10.1177/0145721705275002.

  PMID: 15797850 BACKGROUND

• Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE. The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000 Jul;23(7):943-50. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943.

  PMID: 10895844 BACKGROUND

• Gal RL, Cohen NJ, Kruger D, Beck RW, Bergenstal RM, Calhoun P, Cushman T, Haban A, Hood K, Johnson ML, McArthur T, Olson BA, Weinstock RS, Oser SM, Oser TK, Bugielski B, Strayer H, Aleppo G. Diabetes Telehealth Solutions: Improving Self-Management Through Remote Initiation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring. J Endocr Soc. 2020 Jun 23;4(9):bvaa076. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvaa076. eCollection 2020 Sep 1.

  PMID: 32864542 BACKGROUND

• Vigersky R, Shrivastav M. Role of continuous glucose monitoring for type 2 in diabetes management and research. J Diabetes Complications. 2017 Jan;31(1):280-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

  PMID: 27818105 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Interventions

Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Glucose Metabolism Disorders; Metabolic Diseases; Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases; Endocrine System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Blood Chemical Analysis; Clinical Chemistry Tests; Clinical Laboratory Techniques; Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures; Diagnosis; Diagnostic Techniques, Endocrine; Monitoring, Physiologic; Investigative Techniques

Study Officials

• Colette Knight, MD

  Hackensack Meridian Health

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: NA
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
• Intervention Model: SINGLE GROUP
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: April 21, 2023
• First Posted: May 3, 2023
• Study Start: May 15, 2023
• Primary Completion: September 14, 2024
• Study Completion: September 14, 2024
• Last Updated: January 10, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-01

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

US (1)