NCT05828667

Brief Summary

The STABLE-VT trial aims to determine the safety profile and clinical efficacy of a modified approach to ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation that integrates myocardial scar as visualized on cardiac magnetic resonance (c-MRI) or CT into electroanatomical mapping (EAM) for VT ablation.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable cardiovascular-diseases

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 6, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 25, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 20, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

March 6, 2023

Last Update Submit

May 15, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)

    Incidence of major adverse cardiac events, which are cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke/TIA

    during hospital stay following ablation procedure, up to 1 week

  • Number of Participants Requiring Mechanical circulatory support use

    Incidence of mechanical circulatory support (e.g., extra corporeal membrane oxygenation, Impella, LVAD or transplant) use

    During the procedure, 24-48 hours after the ablation procedure

  • Number of Participants Requiring Inotropic support use

    Incidence of inotropic and vasoactive agents use

    During the procedure, 24-48 hours after the ablation procedure

  • Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Pericardial Effusion

    Assessing clinically significant pericardial effusion causing hemodynamic instability

    During the procedure, up to 24 hours after the ablation procedure

  • Number of Participants With Acute kidney injury

    Acute kidney injury (≥50% within 48 hours of the start of the procedure)

    During procedure, up to 24-48 hours after the ablation procedure

  • Number of Participants Requiring intubation

    Need for intubation

    During procedure, 24 hours after the ablation procedure

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Experimental procedural duration

    During procedure

  • noninvasive programmed stimulation (NIPS) sub-acutely after the procedure

    24-48 hours after the procedure.

  • Mean and peak procedural lactate level

    During procedure

  • Cumulative procedural inotropic support use

    During procedure, 24-48 hours after the ablation procedure

  • Hospital stay length following the procedure

    Periprocedural hospital stay length, up to 2 weeks

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Standard of Care Arm

NO INTERVENTION

Standard of care procedural steps per respective institution and attending physician's clinical practice.

Imaging-aided VT ablation

EXPERIMENTAL

For subjects assigned to the imaging-aided VT ablation arm, CT and/or c-MRI derived myocardial scar will be merged with 3D electroanatomical mapping (EAM) prior to the ablation to allow for readily localization and characterization of VT substrates and potential re-entry circuits to be ablated. This integrated mapping of VT substrates sites to be ablated will be given to the electrophysiologist prior to the ablation.

Other: Incorporation of CT and/or c-MRI derived myocardial scar with 3D electroanatomical mapping (EAM).

Interventions

CT and/or c-MRI derived myocardial scar will be merged with 3D electroanatomical mapping (EAM) prior to the ablation to allow for readily localization and characterization of VT substrates and potential re-entry circuits to be ablated. This is done with the intent to limit the repeated number of inductions and prolonged point-by-point voltage mapping that often result in hemodynamic instability.

Imaging-aided VT ablation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients (\>18 years old) diagnosed with severely reduced ejection fraction defined as EF≤25% or EF≤ 35% with concurrent NYHA class III/IV heart failure symptoms and/or at least one previous heart failure hospitalization in the previous 6 months) who are referred for VT ablation.
  • Patients with moderate to severe RV dysfunction diagnosed on most recent imaging (echo/c-MRI).
  • Patients with must have undergone the imaging (c-MRI and/or CT) required for the investigational VT approach to qualify for participation.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients in whom Impella/ECMO or anesthesia is indicated prior to or at presentation to the EP lab.
  • Patients for whom an informed consent cannot be obtained.
  • Patients who are found to be pregnant using detection of human chorionic gonadotropin (hcg) as done as part of standard of care, will be excluded.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital of The University Of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Bogun FM, Desjardins B, Good E, Gupta S, Crawford T, Oral H, Ebinger M, Pelosi F, Chugh A, Jongnarangsin K, Morady F. Delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in nonischemic cardiomyopathy: utility for identifying the ventricular arrhythmia substrate. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Mar 31;53(13):1138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.11.052.

    PMID: 19324259BACKGROUND
  • Wijnmaalen AP, van der Geest RJ, van Huls van Taxis CF, Siebelink HM, Kroft LJ, Bax JJ, Reiber JH, Schalij MJ, Zeppenfeld K. Head-to-head comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and electroanatomical voltage mapping to assess post-infarct scar characteristics in patients with ventricular tachycardias: real-time image integration and reversed registration. Eur Heart J. 2011 Jan;32(1):104-14. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq345. Epub 2010 Sep 23.

    PMID: 20864488BACKGROUND
  • Andreu D, Berruezo A, Ortiz-Perez JT, Silva E, Mont L, Borras R, de Caralt TM, Perea RJ, Fernandez-Armenta J, Zeljko H, Brugada J. Integration of 3D electroanatomic maps and magnetic resonance scar characterization into the navigation system to guide ventricular tachycardia ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011 Oct;4(5):674-83. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.961946. Epub 2011 Aug 31.

    PMID: 21880674BACKGROUND
  • Komatsu Y, Cochet H, Jadidi A, Sacher F, Shah A, Derval N, Scherr D, Pascale P, Roten L, Denis A, Ramoul K, Miyazaki S, Daly M, Riffaud M, Sermesant M, Relan J, Ayache N, Kim S, Montaudon M, Laurent F, Hocini M, Haissaguerre M, Jais P. Regional myocardial wall thinning at multidetector computed tomography correlates to arrhythmogenic substrate in postinfarction ventricular tachycardia: assessment of structural and electrical substrate. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr;6(2):342-50. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.112.000191. Epub 2013 Mar 10.

    PMID: 23476043BACKGROUND
  • Liang JJ, Muser D, Santangeli P. Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Clinical Trials. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2017 Mar;9(1):153-165. doi: 10.1016/j.ccep.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Dec 24.

    PMID: 28167083BACKGROUND
  • Santangeli P, Muser D, Maeda S, Filtz A, Zado ES, Frankel DS, Dixit S, Epstein AE, Callans DJ, Marchlinski FE. Comparative effectiveness of antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation for the prevention of recurrent ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jul;13(7):1552-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Mar 4.

    PMID: 26961297BACKGROUND
  • Liang JJ, Santangeli P, Callans DJ. Long-term Outcomes of Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Different Types of Structural Heart Disease. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2015 Dec;4(3):177-83. doi: 10.15420/aer.2015.4.3.177. Epub 2015 Dec 1.

    PMID: 26835122BACKGROUND
  • Santangeli P, Muser D, Zado ES, Magnani S, Khetpal S, Hutchinson MD, Supple G, Frankel DS, Garcia FC, Bala R, Riley MP, Lin D, Rame JE, Schaller R, Dixit S, Marchlinski FE, Callans DJ. Acute hemodynamic decompensation during catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia: incidence, predictors, and impact on mortality. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Feb;8(1):68-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002155. Epub 2014 Dec 9.

    PMID: 25491601BACKGROUND
  • Santangeli P, Frankel DS, Tung R, Vaseghi M, Sauer WH, Tzou WS, Mathuria N, Nakahara S, Dickfeldt TM, Lakkireddy D, Bunch TJ, Di Biase L, Natale A, Tholakanahalli V, Tedrow UB, Kumar S, Stevenson WG, Della Bella P, Shivkumar K, Marchlinski FE, Callans DJ; International VT Ablation Center Collaborative Group. Early Mortality After Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Structural Heart Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 2;69(17):2105-2115. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.044.

    PMID: 28449770BACKGROUND
  • Tzou WS, Tung R, Frankel DS, Vaseghi M, Bunch TJ, Di Biase L, Tholakanahalli VN, Lakkireddy D, Dickfeld T, Saliaris A, Weiss JP, Mathuria N, Tedrow U, Afzal MR, Vergara P, Nagashima K, Patel M, Nakahara S, Vakil K, Burkhardt JD, Tseng CH, Natale A, Shivkumar K, Callans DJ, Stevenson WG, Della Bella P, Marchlinski FE, Sauer WH. Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Severe Heart Failure: An International Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Center Collaboration Analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Jan;10(1):e004494. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004494.

    PMID: 28082527BACKGROUND
  • Zghaib T, Ipek EG, Hansford R, Ashikaga H, Berger RD, Marine JE, Spragg DD, Tandri H, Zimmerman SL, Halperin H, Brancato S, Calkins H, Henrikson C, Nazarian S. Standard Ablation Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Ablation in the Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018 Jan;11(1):e005973. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005973. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29330333BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A randomized controlled non-blinded prospective single-center study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2023

First Posted

April 25, 2023

Study Start

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion

March 1, 2024

Study Completion

March 1, 2024

Last Updated

May 20, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations