Investigating Hearing Aid Frequency Response Curves 2
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Internal research on the manufacturer's hearing aid products has idenitfied areas in which the investigators can improve the hearing aid frequency response curve. Based on the conclusions of the first study, we have identified areas that require further analysis and testing prior to implementing of the proposed frequency response curve into our products. This study aims to investigate the current freqeuncy response curve in the manufacturer's products to variations of these curves to determine if hearing aid users prefer the variations over the manufacturer's standard curve.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 24, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 25, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 11, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 11, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 18, 2025
CompletedMarch 18, 2025
September 1, 2023
5 months
March 24, 2023
December 5, 2023
March 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Sound Quality Ratings - Listening Comfort - Program 1
Participants will be asked to wear hearing aids and as they are exposed to listening environments. They will be asked to toggle between the two hearing aid programs (standard curve and variation #1) and determine which program provides increased listening comfort. Participants will be asked to make these ratings while seated in a sound booth. Scores will be tallied at the end to see which program of the two was preferred more in the different listening environments. Scores can range from 0 (the program was not preferred at all) to unlimited (dependent on the numbers of trials ran and samples tested). Higher scores will indicate that the program was preferred more than the other program and lowers scores mean the program was not preferred when compared to the other program.
10 Minutes
Sound Quality Ratings - Overall Preference - Program 1
Participants will be asked to wear hearing aids and as they are exposed to listening environments. They will be asked to toggle between the two hearing aid programs (standard curve and variation #1) and determine which program they prefer to listen to. Participants will be asked to make these ratings while seated in a sound booth. Scores will be tallied at the end to see which program of the two was preferred more in the different listening environments. Scores can range from 0 (the program was not preferred at all) to unlimited (dependent on the numbers of trials run and samples tested). Higher scores will indicate that the program was preferred more than the other program and lowers scores mean the program was not preferred when compared to the other program.
10 Minutes
Sound Quality Ratings - Speech Clarity - Program 1
Participants will be asked to wear hearing aids and as they are exposed to listening environments. They will be asked to toggle between the two hearing aid programs (standard curve and variation #1) and determine which program has better speech clarity. Participants will be asked to make these ratings while seated in a sound booth. Scores will be tallied at the end to see which program of the two was preferred more in the different listening environments. Scores can range from 0 (the program was not preferred at all) to unlimited (dependent on the numbers of trials ran and samples tested). Higher scores will indicate that the program was preferred more than the other program and lowers scores mean the program was not preferred when compared to the other program.
10 minutes
Sound Quality Ratings - Noise Intrusion - Program 1
Participants will be asked to wear hearing aids and as they are exposed to listening environments. They will be asked to toggle between the two hearing aid programs (Standard curve and variation #1) and determine which program has more noise intrusion. Participants will be asked to make these ratings while seated in a sound booth. Scores will be tallied at the end to see which program of the two was preferred more in the different listening environments. Scores can range from 0 (the program was not preferred at all) to unlimited (dependent on the numbers of trials ran and samples tested). Higher scores will indicate that the program was preferred more than the other program and lowers scores mean the program was not preferred when compared to the other program.
10 Minutes
Sound Quality Ratings - Listening Comfort - Program 2
Participants will be asked to wear hearing aids and as they are exposed to listening environments. They will be asked to toggle between the two hearing aid programs (standard curve and variation #1) and determine which program provides increased listening comfort. Participants will be asked to make these ratings while seated in a sound booth. Scores will be tallied at the end to see which program of the two was preferred more in the different listening environments. Scores can range from 0 (the program was not preferred at all) to unlimited (dependent on the numbers of trials ran and samples tested). Higher scores will indicate that the program was preferred more than the other program and lowers scores mean the program was not preferred when compared to the other program.
10 Minutes
Sound Quality Ratings - Overall Preference - Program 2
Participants will be asked to wear hearing aids and as they are exposed to listening environments. They will be asked to toggle between the two hearing aid programs (standard curve and variation #1) and determine which program they prefer to listen to. Participants will be asked to make these ratings while seated in a sound booth. Scores will be tallied at the end to see which program of the two was preferred more in the different listening environments. Scores can range from 0 (the program was not preferred at all) to unlimited (dependent on the numbers of trials run and samples tested). Higher scores will indicate that the program was preferred more than the other program and lowers scores mean the program was not preferred when compared to the other program.
10 Minutes
Sound Quality Ratings - Noise Intrusion - Program 2
Participants will be asked to wear hearing aids and as they are exposed to listening environments. They will be asked to toggle between the two hearing aid programs (Standard curve and variation #1) and determine which program has more noise intrusion. Participants will be asked to make these ratings while seated in a sound booth. Scores will be tallied at the end to see which program of the two was preferred more in the different listening environments. Scores can range from 0 (the program was not preferred at all) to unlimited (dependent on the numbers of trials ran and samples tested). Higher scores will indicate that the program was preferred more than the other program and lowers scores mean the program was not preferred when compared to the other program.
10 Minutes
Sound Quality Ratings - Listening Comfort - Program 3
Participants will be asked to wear hearing aids and as they are exposed to listening environments. They will be asked to toggle between the two hearing aid programs (standard curve and variation #1) and determine which program provides increased listening comfort. Participants will be asked to make these ratings while seated in a sound booth. Scores will be tallied at the end to see which program of the two was preferred more in the different listening environments. Scores can range from 0 (the program was not preferred at all) to unlimited (dependent on the numbers of trials ran and samples tested). Higher scores will indicate that the program was preferred more than the other program and lowers scores mean the program was not preferred when compared to the other program.
10 Minutes
Sound Quality Ratings - Overall Preference - Program 3
Participants will be asked to wear hearing aids and as they are exposed to listening environments. They will be asked to toggle between the two hearing aid programs (standard curve and variation #1) and determine which program they prefer to listen to. Participants will be asked to make these ratings while seated in a sound booth. Scores will be tallied at the end to see which program of the two was preferred more in the different listening environments. Scores can range from 0 (the program was not preferred at all) to unlimited (dependent on the numbers of trials run and samples tested). Higher scores will indicate that the program was preferred more than the other program and lowers scores mean the program was not preferred when compared to the other program.
10 Minutes
Sound Quality Ratings - Speech Clarity - Program 3
Participants will be asked to wear hearing aids and as they are exposed to listening environments. They will be asked to toggle between the two hearing aid programs (standard curve and variation #1) and determine which program has better speech clarity. Participants will be asked to make these ratings while seated in a sound booth. Scores will be tallied at the end to see which program of the two was preferred more in the different listening environments. Scores can range from 0 (the program was not preferred at all) to unlimited (dependent on the numbers of trials ran and samples tested). Higher scores will indicate that the program was preferred more than the other program and lowers scores mean the program was not preferred when compared to the other program.
10 minutes
Sound Quality Ratings - Noise Intrusion - Program 3
Participants will be asked to wear hearing aids and as they are exposed to listening environments. They will be asked to toggle between the two hearing aid programs (Standard curve and variation #1) and determine which program has more noise intrusion. Participants will be asked to make these ratings while seated in a sound booth. Scores will be tallied at the end to see which program of the two was preferred more in the different listening environments. Scores can range from 0 (the program was not preferred at all) to unlimited (dependent on the numbers of trials ran and samples tested). Higher scores will indicate that the program was preferred more than the other program and lowers scores mean the program was not preferred when compared to the other program.
10 Minutes
Sound Quality Ratings - Overall Preference - Program 4
Participants will be asked to wear hearing aids and as they are exposed to listening environments. They will be asked to toggle between the two hearing aid programs (standard curve and variation #1) and determine which program they prefer to listen to. Participants will be asked to make these ratings while seated in a sound booth. Scores will be tallied at the end to see which program of the two was preferred more in the different listening environments. Scores can range from 0 (the program was not preferred at all) to unlimited (dependent on the numbers of trials run and samples tested). Higher scores will indicate that the program was preferred more than the other program and lowers scores mean the program was not preferred when compared to the other program.
10 Minutes
Secondary Outcomes (2)
US Matrix Test in Noise Results - dB SNR 50%
30 Minutes
Sound Quality Ratings - Streaming
1 hour
Study Arms (1)
Participants with Hearing Loss
EXPERIMENTALIndividuals with hearing loss that meet the candidacy to wear hearing aids. All interventions are associated with the fitting of binaural hearing aids with various coupling methods. All participants will be assessed under all interventions.
Interventions
Our current hearing aids which will be programmed to our standard frequency response curve.
Hearing aids that will have the frequency response curve #1 adjusted and fit to the participant's hearing loss.
Our current hearing aids which will be programmed to our standard frequency response curve.
Hearing aids that will have the frequency response curve #3 adjusted and fit to the participant's hearing loss.
Hearing aids that will have the frequency response curve #4 adjusted and fit to the participant's hearing loss.
Our current hearing aids which will be programmed to our standard frequency response curve.
Hearing aids that will have the frequency response curve #1 adjusted and fit to the participant's hearing loss.
Our current hearing aids which will be programmed to our standard frequency response curve.
Hearing aids that will have the frequency response curve #1 adjusted and fit to the participant's hearing loss.
Our current hearing aids which will be programmed to our standard frequency response curve.
Hearing aids that will have the frequency response curve #1 adjusted and fit to the participant's hearing loss.
No hearing aids worn at all and participants tested as is.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- N3 - N5 Hearing losses
- Healthy Outer ear
- No visible congenital or traumatic deformity of the outer ear
- Symmetrical hearing loss - no air-bone gap greater than 10 dB at all 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz.
- Ability to answer questions and repeat sentences
- No history of problematic tinnitus or pain/discomfort from loud sounds
- No history of active drainage from the ears in the past 90 days
- Willingness to wear different styles of couplings
- Willingness to wear binaural fitting
- Experienced Users = more than 3 months of hearing aid experience
- Ability to travel to Sonova facilities
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to the medical device (MD) in this study (e.g. known hypersensitivity or allergy to the investigational products)
- Limited mobility/not able to come to the scheduled visit
- Inability to produce reliable hearing test results
- History of active drainage from the ear in the previous 90 days
- Abnormal appearance of the eardrum and ear canal.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sonova AGlead
Study Sites (1)
Sonova - Kitchener
Kitchener, Ontario, N2E 1Y6, Canada
Related Publications (7)
Vaisberg J, Folkeard P, Levy S, Dundas D, Agrawal S, Scollie S. Sound Quality Ratings of Amplified Speech and Music Using a Direct Drive Hearing Aid: Effects of Bandwidth. Otol Neurotol. 2021 Feb 1;42(2):227-234. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002915.
PMID: 32976346BACKGROUNDHarianawala J, Galster J, Hornsby B. Psychometric Comparison of the Hearing in Noise Test and the American English Matrix Test. J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Apr;30(4):315-326. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17112. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
PMID: 30461418BACKGROUNDWu YH, Stangl E, Chipara O, Hasan SS, Welhaven A, Oleson J. Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss. Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):293-304. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000486.
PMID: 29466265BACKGROUNDNeuman AC, Bakke MH, Hellman S, Levitt H. Effect of compression ratio in a slow-acting compression hearing aid: paired-comparison judgments of quality. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Sep;96(3):1471-8. doi: 10.1121/1.410289.
PMID: 7963011BACKGROUNDCaswell-Midwinter B, Whitmer WM. Discrimination of Gain Increments in Speech-Shaped Noises. Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216518820220. doi: 10.1177/2331216518820220.
PMID: 30803400BACKGROUNDSmeds K, Wolters F, Rung M. Estimation of Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Sound Scenarios. J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Feb;26(2):183-96. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.26.2.7.
PMID: 25690777BACKGROUNDBisgaard N, Vlaming MS, Dahlquist M. Standard audiograms for the IEC 60118-15 measurement procedure. Trends Amplif. 2010 Jun;14(2):113-20. doi: 10.1177/1084713810379609.
PMID: 20724358BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Bilal Sheikh - Research Audiologist
- Organization
- Sonova
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jinyu Qian, PhD
Sonova AG
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Participant were blinded to the type of intervention (i.e., hearing aid curve) or program they were comparing or rating. They were simply asked to specify which intervention they had a preference for.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 24, 2023
First Posted
April 25, 2023
Study Start
May 1, 2023
Primary Completion
October 11, 2023
Study Completion
October 11, 2023
Last Updated
March 18, 2025
Results First Posted
March 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share