Investigating Hearing Aid Frequency Response Curves
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Internal research on the manufacturer's hearing aid products has idenitfied areas in which the investigators can improve the hearing aid frequency response curve. This study aims to investigate the current freqeuncy response curve in the manufacturer's products to variations of these curves to determine if hearing aid users prefer the variations over the manufacturer's standard curve.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 24, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 11, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 11, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 24, 2025
CompletedMarch 24, 2025
November 1, 2023
3 months
August 26, 2022
November 21, 2023
March 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Streaming Sound Quality Ratings
Pre-filtered sound samples (based on frequency response curves) will be presented via a paired comparison task in which participants will determine which sound sample they prefer (i.e. better sound quality). Sound samples will be presented via hearing aids that are programmed to the participant's hearing loss. Participant's will be presented with two samples at a time and will choose which sample they prefer. For example, if Sample A was preferred over Sample B, then Sample A gets a score of 1. If Sample B was preferred over Sample A, then Sample B gets a score of 1. At the end of the task, scores will be tallied to determine which sample was preferred the most overall. There will be 5 different samples. The minimum value for the tallied score would be 0 (the sample was not preferred at all) and the maximum value would be 8 (implying that the sample was preferred in all trials). Higher scores mean that the sample was preferred more and lowers scores mean the sample was not preferred.
60 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Sound Quality Rating - Live - Counts
60 minutes
Sound Quality Rating - Live - Preferences
60 minutes
US Matrix Test in Quiet - SRT
30 Minutes
Study Arms (1)
Participants with Hearing Loss
EXPERIMENTALIndividuals with hearing loss that meet the candidacy to wear hearing aids. All interventions are associated with the fitting of binaural hearing aids with various coupling methods. All participants will be assessed under all interventions.
Interventions
Our current hearing aids which will be programmed to our standard frequency response curve.
Hearing aids that will have the frequency response curve adjusted and fit to the participant's hearing loss.
Hearing aids that will have the frequency response curve adjusted and fit to the participant's hearing loss.
Hearing aids that will have the frequency response curve adjusted and fit to the participant's hearing loss.
Hearing aids that will have the frequency response curve adjusted and fit to the participant's hearing loss.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- N2 - N4 Hearing losses
- Health Outer ear
- no visible congenital or traumatic deformity of the outer ear
- Symmetrical hearing loss - no air-bone gap greater than 10 dB at all 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz.
- Ability to answer questions and repeat sentences
- No history of problematic tinnitus or pain/discomfort from loud sounds
- No history of active drainage from the ears in the past 90 daysInformed consent as documented by signature
- Willingness to wear different styles of couplings
- Willingness to wear binaural fitting
- Experienced Users = more than 3 months of hearing aid experience. If not more than 3 months, they will be considered a new user (Experience will not exclude them from study, only will be used to categorize them)
- Ability to travel throughout facility
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to the medical device (MD) in this study (e.g. known hypersensitivity or allergy to the investigational products)
- Limited mobility/not able to come to the scheduled visit
- Inability to produce reliable hearing test results
- History of active drainage from the ear in the previous 90 days
- Abnormal appearance of the eardrum and ear canal.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sonova AGlead
Study Sites (1)
Sonova - Kitchener
Kitchener, Ontario, N2E 1Y6, Canada
Related Publications (4)
Vaisberg J, Folkeard P, Levy S, Dundas D, Agrawal S, Scollie S. Sound Quality Ratings of Amplified Speech and Music Using a Direct Drive Hearing Aid: Effects of Bandwidth. Otol Neurotol. 2021 Feb 1;42(2):227-234. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002915.
PMID: 32976346BACKGROUNDHarianawala J, Galster J, Hornsby B. Psychometric Comparison of the Hearing in Noise Test and the American English Matrix Test. J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Apr;30(4):315-326. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17112. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
PMID: 30461418BACKGROUNDWu YH, Stangl E, Chipara O, Hasan SS, Welhaven A, Oleson J. Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss. Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):293-304. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000486.
PMID: 29466265BACKGROUNDNeuman AC, Bakke MH, Hellman S, Levitt H. Effect of compression ratio in a slow-acting compression hearing aid: paired-comparison judgments of quality. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Sep;96(3):1471-8. doi: 10.1121/1.410289.
PMID: 7963011BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Bilal Sheikh - Research Audiologist
- Organization
- Sonova
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jinyu Qian, PhD
Sonova AG
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2022
First Posted
August 30, 2022
Study Start
October 24, 2022
Primary Completion
January 11, 2023
Study Completion
January 11, 2023
Last Updated
March 24, 2025
Results First Posted
March 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share