Study Stopped
Recruitment closed before reaching the target sample size (24) due to budgetary and logistical constraints. The planned pilot randomized phase was not conducted for the same reasons.
Prone Positioning and Thoracoabdominal Binding on Lung and Muscle Protection in ARDS Patients During Spontaneous Breathing
Effect of Prone Positioning and Thoracoabdominal Binding on Lung and Muscle Protection in ARDS Patients With ICU-acquired Weakness Transitioning From Controlled to Spontaneous Breathing
1 other identifier
interventional
14
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction and intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired weakness are two consequences of prolonged mechanical ventilation and critical illness in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Both complicate the process of withdrawing mechanical ventilation, increase hospital mortality and cause chronic disability in survivors. During transition from controlled to spontaneous breathing, these complications of critical illness favor an abnormal respiratory pattern and recruit accessory respiratory muscles which may promote additional lung and muscle injury. The type of ventilatory support and positioning may affect the muscle dysfunction and patient-self-inflicted lung injury at spontaneous breathing onset. In that regard, ARDS patients with ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction and ICU-acquired weakness who are transitioning from controlled to partial ventilatory support probably present an abnormal respiratory pattern which exacerbates lung and muscle injury. Physiological-oriented ventilatory approaches based on prone positioning or semi recumbent positioning with abdominal binding at spontaneous breathing onset, could decrease lung and muscle injury by favoring a better neuromuscular efficiency, and preventing intense inspiratory efforts and high transpulmonary driving pressures, as well as high-magnitude pendelluft. In the current project, in addition to perform a multimodal description of the severity of ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction and ICU-acquired weakness in prolonged mechanically ventilated ARDS patients, prone positioning and supine plus thoracoabdominal binding at spontaneous breathing onset will be evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 6, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 6, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 28, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 28, 2025
CompletedSeptember 28, 2026
September 1, 2026
1.7 years
March 6, 2023
September 23, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
(Randomized Crossover Trial Phase) Pendelluft Magnitude
Pendelluft magnitude monitored by electrical impedance tomography, analyzed as a continuous variable. Title corrected in September 2026 from "High-Magnitude Pendelluft", as no threshold was prespecified and the sample size calculation was based on a continuous outcome, according to the protocol amendment approved in May 2024.
One hour on each ventilatory strategy
(Randomized Crossover Trial Phase) Neuromechanical Coupling of the Diaphragm
Ratio between transdiaphragmatic pressure and electrical activity of the diaphragm, measured by an esophageal/gastric catheter. Co-primary outcome with pendelluft magnitude. Prespecified as primary in the ethics-approved protocol and described in the Brief Summary and as a secondary outcome of the Pilot Randomized Trial Phase, but omitted in error from the Crossover Phase outcomes in the original registration. Added in September 2026.
One hour on each ventilatory strategy
Secondary Outcomes (1)
(Randomized Crossover Trial Phase) Respiratory Mechanics Variables
One hour on each ventilatory strategy
Study Arms (3)
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORARDS patients at spontaneous breathing onset on pressure support ventilation mode in semi-recumbent position at 45º degrees, performed under individualized PEEP applied in random order.
Prone Positioning
EXPERIMENTALARDS patients at spontaneous breathing onset on pressure support ventilation mode in prone position, performed under individualized PEEP applied in random order.
Thoracoabdominal Binding
EXPERIMENTALARDS patients at spontaneous breathing onset on pressure support ventilation mode in semi-recumbent position at 45º degrees using thoracoabdominal binding with the binder's upper edge above the costal margin, performed under individualized PEEP applied in random order.
Interventions
Prone positioning will be performed according to ICU local protocol with trained provider teams.
Thoracoabdominal binding will be used in semi-recumbent position (at 45º) and titrated to obtain a approximately 20% decrease in chest wall compliance and 1-3 cm H2O increase in end-expiratory gastric pressure during steady-state breathing
ARDS patients at spontaneous breathing onset on pressure support ventilation mode in supine position at 45º degrees, performed under standard PEEP according to ARDSNet strategy and individualized PEEP applied in random order.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult ARDS patients with moderate-severe ARDS on controlled protective mechanical ventilation for more than 2 days (modified from "more than 3 days" by the protocol amendment approved in May 2024)
- Stable hemodynamics
- Level of consciousness enough to initiate spontaneous breathing
You may not qualify if:
- Unstable hemodynamics
- Tracheostomy
- Abnormal level of consciousness
- Central nervous system injury
- Esophageal varices
- Pregnancy
- Contraindications for installation of electrical impedance tomography or nasogastric catheter placement
- Contraindications for prone positioning and thoracoabdominal binding
- Chronic neuromuscular disorders
- Obstructive lung disease; intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) ≥3 cmH₂O (measured without inspiratory effort);
- Recent-onset sepsis and moderate-to-severe metabolic acidosis;
- Multi-organ failure with high short-term mortality risk
- Clinical evidence of respiratory or hemodynamic instability
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile
Independencia, Chile
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rodrigo Cornejo
University of Chile
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Masking of participants, care providers and investigators was not feasible due to the nature of the interventions (body positioning and thoracoabdominal binding). In the multimodal physiological description, diaphragm ultrasound and conventional electromyography were performed by assessors unaware of the results of the other physiological assessments.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Full Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 6, 2023
First Posted
April 24, 2023
Study Start
December 6, 2023
Primary Completion
August 28, 2025
Study Completion
August 28, 2025
Last Updated
September 28, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Beginning after publication, for 5 years.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers with a methodologically sound proposal, after ethics committee approval.
De-identified individual participant data underlying the published results will be available upon reasonable request to the principal investigator, subject to approval by the local ethics committee and a data use agreement.