Evaluation of the Effect of Dextrose Prolotherapy Versus Dry Needling Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The hypertonic dextrose injection; Prolotherapy is a proliferation injection therapy that aims to trigger a low-grade inflammatory response inside the (TMJ), with the resultant captivation of abundant fibroblasts that regenerate and strengthen the tendinous and ligamentous attachments and stabilize the disc and the fibro-osseous junctions. On the other hand, dry needling' refers to the insertion of needles without the use of injectate. Dry needling is beneficial for treating a variety of neuromusculoskeletal pain syndromes as it represents a treatment modality for the ligaments and tendons, muscles, subcutaneous fascia, peripheral nerves, and neurovascular bundles. Deep dry needling (DDN) is a technique that utilizes the Intracapsular insertion of dry needles to approach the discal insertion to the lateral pterygoid muscle and the masseteric muscle origin, along the zygomatic bone and arch, aiming to inactivate the muscular trigger points (TPs).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2024
CompletedMay 3, 2024
May 1, 2024
6 months
March 29, 2023
May 2, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Pain threshold
by using visual analogue scale from 0 to 10 which 10 is the worst pain
8 months
Interincisal opening
distance by cm caliber from the between the anterior teeth at the maximal unassisted nonpainful opening of the patient.
8 months
clicking
(evident or not)
8 months
Study Arms (2)
The Study group
OTHERThe patients within the study group will receive intraarticular TMJ and masseteric Trigger point injection of a solution that contains (0.75 ml. 12.5% Dextrose solution, 0.75 ml. Saline solution, and 1.5 ml. Lidocaine).
The Control group
OTHERPatients in the control group will receive intraarticular TMJ and masseteric Trigger point dry needle insertion without injecting any solution.
Interventions
The patients within the study group will receive intraarticular TMJ and masseteric Trigger point injection of a solution that contains (0.75 ml. 12.5% Dextrose solution, 0.75 ml. Saline solution, and 1.5 ml. Lidocaine). Each patient will receive four injections at two-week intervals, aided by a 25 gauge needle connected to a 3 ml. plastic syringe.
The Control group: Patients in the control group will receive intraarticular TMJ and masseteric Trigger point dry needle insertion without injecting any solution. Each patient will receive four dry needle insertions at two-week intervals, aided by a 25-gauge and 3.8 cm length needle. i.e., All the patients will be subjected to intraarticular needle insertion. However, only the patients within the study group will be injected with the Dextrose Prolotherapy solution.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients of both genders with an age group of 18-45 years.
- Those patients with the radiographic interpretation of temporomandibular joint disc displacement with reduction (MRI) and the clinical signs of pain, limitation of mouth opening, and TMJ clicking.
- The presence of associated myofascial pain with masseteric trigger points (TPs)
You may not qualify if:
- Any previous temporomandibular joint treatment.
- Any systemic disease affecting the temporomandibular joint's anatomy, mechanical function, or outcome of the proposed treatment.
- Those Patients with a history of allergic reactions to any components of the injectable solution
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Beni-suef university
Banī Suwayf, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
Gibaly A, Abdelmoiz M, Alghandour AN. Evaluation of the effect of dextrose prolotherapy versus deep dry needling therapy for the treatment of temporomandibular joint anterior disc displacement with reduction: (a randomized controlled trial). Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Aug 8;28(9):475. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05830-z.
PMID: 39115583DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2023
First Posted
April 20, 2023
Study Start
September 1, 2023
Primary Completion
March 1, 2024
Study Completion
April 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share