Tranexamic Acid's Effects in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
Transamin
1 other identifier
interventional
122
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The study is randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial that aims to check whether tranexamic acid's use in videolaparoscopic radical prostatectomy intraoperative is effective in decrease serum hemoglobin drop and the amount of blood's transfusion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 prostate-cancer
Started Apr 2023
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 prostate-cancer
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 22, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2024
CompletedApril 18, 2023
April 1, 2023
1 year
December 22, 2022
April 17, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in serum Hemoglobin levels from preoperative to post operative levels
The serum hemoglobin drop will be evaluated
Baseline (Before) and 12 and 24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Estimated volume of bleeding
During surgery
Transfusion rate of red blood cell concentrates
12 and 24 hours after surgery
Adverse effects tranexamic acid
Up to 30 days after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Tranexamic Acid Group
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive an attack solution of 1,0 g of tranexamic acid 20 minutes before the surgery beginning, followed by a maintence dose of 1,0 mg/kg/h in pump surgery infusion
Placebo Group
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients undergoinf to videolaparoscopic surgery will receive physcological saline as placebo under the same conditions of the tranexamic acid group.
Interventions
Patients with prostate cancer and radical video laparoscopy prostatectomy indication will receive 1,0g of Tranexamic Acid solution IV in bolus 20 minutes before of anesthetic induction, followed by a maintenance hose of 1,0mg/kg/h of surgery.
Patients randomized to placebo group will receive physiological saline and will undergo to the radical video laparoscopu prostatectomy normally
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients over 18 years olds;
- Who accept to participate and sign the consent form;
- Compliance with the study follow-up protocol;
- Diagnosed with localized prostate cancer with surgical indication without or with lymphadenectomy.
You may not qualify if:
- Coronary artery disease treated with drug-using stent;
- Previous coronary procedures or coronary disease using a stent;
- Acute or chronic liver failure;
- Severe chronic renal failure (ClCr \< 30 mL/Kg.h, according to the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula);
- Suspected allergy to tranexamic acid;
- Known coagulopathies and refusal to sign consent form.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (33)
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
PMID: 33538338BACKGROUNDEtzioni R, Tsodikov A, Mariotto A, Szabo A, Falcon S, Wegelin J, DiTommaso D, Karnofski K, Gulati R, Penson DF, Feuer E. Quantifying the role of PSA screening in the US prostate cancer mortality decline. Cancer Causes Control. 2008 Mar;19(2):175-81. doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-9083-8. Epub 2007 Nov 20.
PMID: 18027095BACKGROUNDTsodikov A, Gulati R, Heijnsdijk EAM, Pinsky PF, Moss SM, Qiu S, de Carvalho TM, Hugosson J, Berg CD, Auvinen A, Andriole GL, Roobol MJ, Crawford ED, Nelen V, Kwiatkowski M, Zappa M, Lujan M, Villers A, Feuer EJ, de Koning HJ, Mariotto AB, Etzioni R. Reconciling the Effects of Screening on Prostate Cancer Mortality in the ERSPC and PLCO Trials. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 3;167(7):449-455. doi: 10.7326/M16-2586. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
PMID: 28869989BACKGROUNDD'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Cote K, Loffredo M, Schultz D, Chen MH, Tomaszewski JE, Renshaw AA, Wein A, Richie JP. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era. Cancer. 2002 Jul 15;95(2):281-6. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10657.
PMID: 12124827BACKGROUNDBekelman JE, Rumble RB, Chen RC, Pisansky TM, Finelli A, Feifer A, Nguyen PL, Loblaw DA, Tagawa ST, Gillessen S, Morgan TM, Liu G, Vapiwala N, Haluschak JJ, Stephenson A, Touijer K, Kungel T, Freedland SJ. Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement of an American Urological Association/American Society for Radiation Oncology/Society of Urologic Oncology Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov 10;36(32):3251-3258. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.00606. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
PMID: 30183466BACKGROUNDMottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Grummet J, Henry AM, van der Kwast TH, Lam TB, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason MD, Moris L, Oprea-Lager DE, van der Poel HG, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, Wiegel T, Willemse PM, Cornford P. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
PMID: 33172724BACKGROUNDRainwater LM, Segura JW. Technical consideration in radical retropubic prostatectomy: blood loss after ligation of dorsal venous complex. J Urol. 1990 Jun;143(6):1163-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40215-1.
PMID: 2342176BACKGROUNDRamsay C, Pickard R, Robertson C, Close A, Vale L, Armstrong N, Barocas DA, Eden CG, Fraser C, Gurung T, Jenkinson D, Jia X, Lam TB, Mowatt G, Neal DE, Robinson MC, Royle J, Rushton SP, Sharma P, Shirley MD, Soomro N. Systematic review and economic modelling of the relative clinical benefit and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for removal of the prostate in men with localised prostate cancer. Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(41):1-313. doi: 10.3310/hta16410.
PMID: 23127367BACKGROUNDBasiri A, de la Rosette JJ, Tabatabaei S, Woo HH, Laguna MP, Shemshaki H. Comparison of retropubic, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: who is the winner? World J Urol. 2018 Apr;36(4):609-621. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2174-1. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
PMID: 29362896BACKGROUNDRassweiler J, Hruza M, Teber D, Su LM. Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy--critical analysis of the results. Eur Urol. 2006 Apr;49(4):612-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.054. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
PMID: 16442210BACKGROUNDIlic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, Jung JH, Murphy D, Frydenberg M. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.
PMID: 28895658BACKGROUNDMohler JL, Antonarakis ES, Armstrong AJ, D'Amico AV, Davis BJ, Dorff T, Eastham JA, Enke CA, Farrington TA, Higano CS, Horwitz EM, Hurwitz M, Ippolito JE, Kane CJ, Kuettel MR, Lang JM, McKenney J, Netto G, Penson DF, Plimack ER, Pow-Sang JM, Pugh TJ, Richey S, Roach M, Rosenfeld S, Schaeffer E, Shabsigh A, Small EJ, Spratt DE, Srinivas S, Tward J, Shead DA, Freedman-Cass DA. Prostate Cancer, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 May 1;17(5):479-505. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0023.
PMID: 31085757BACKGROUNDTewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M; Members of the VIP Team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int. 2003 Aug;92(3):205-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04311.x.
PMID: 12887468BACKGROUNDFicarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1037-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036. Epub 2009 Jan 25.
PMID: 19185977BACKGROUNDCRASH-2 trial collaborators; Shakur H, Roberts I, Bautista R, Caballero J, Coats T, Dewan Y, El-Sayed H, Gogichaishvili T, Gupta S, Herrera J, Hunt B, Iribhogbe P, Izurieta M, Khamis H, Komolafe E, Marrero MA, Mejia-Mantilla J, Miranda J, Morales C, Olaomi O, Olldashi F, Perel P, Peto R, Ramana PV, Ravi RR, Yutthakasemsunt S. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2010 Jul 3;376(9734):23-32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60835-5. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
PMID: 20554319BACKGROUNDNapolitano LM, Cohen MJ, Cotton BA, Schreiber MA, Moore EE. Tranexamic acid in trauma: how should we use it? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jun;74(6):1575-86. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318292cc54. No abstract available.
PMID: 23694890BACKGROUNDLin ZX, Woolf SK. Safety, Efficacy, and Cost-effectiveness of Tranexamic Acid in Orthopedic Surgery. Orthopedics. 2016 Mar-Apr;39(2):119-30. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160301-05. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
PMID: 26942474BACKGROUNDClaeys MA, Vermeersch N, Haentjens P. Reduction of blood loss with tranexamic acid in primary total hip replacement surgery. Acta Chir Belg. 2007 Jul-Aug;107(4):397-401. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2007.11680081.
PMID: 17966532BACKGROUNDDietrich W, Spannagl M, Boehm J, Hauner K, Braun S, Schuster T, Busley R. Tranexamic acid and aprotinin in primary cardiac operations: an analysis of 220 cardiac surgical patients treated with tranexamic acid or aprotinin. Anesth Analg. 2008 Nov;107(5):1469-78. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318182252b.
PMID: 18931201BACKGROUNDMACFARLANE RG. AN ENZYME CASCADE IN THE BLOOD CLOTTING MECHANISM, AND ITS FUNCTION AS A BIOCHEMICAL AMPLIFIER. Nature. 1964 May 2;202:498-9. doi: 10.1038/202498a0. No abstract available.
PMID: 14167839BACKGROUNDDAVIE EW, RATNOFF OD. WATERFALL SEQUENCE FOR INTRINSIC BLOOD CLOTTING. Science. 1964 Sep 18;145(3638):1310-2. doi: 10.1126/science.145.3638.1310.
PMID: 14173416BACKGROUNDWang YL, Jiang B, Yin FF, Shi HQ, Xu XD, Zheng SS, Wu S, Hou SC. Perioperative Blood Transfusion Promotes Worse Outcomes of Bladder Cancer after Radical Cystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 16;10(6):e0130122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130122. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26080092BACKGROUNDLinder BJ, Frank I, Cheville JC, Tollefson MK, Thompson RH, Tarrell RF, Thapa P, Boorjian SA. The impact of perioperative blood transfusion on cancer recurrence and survival following radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2013 May;63(5):839-45. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
PMID: 23332883BACKGROUNDKerkebe Lama M, Orellana Salinas NR, Flores Martinez JM, Olivares Gribbell RA, Storme Cabrera O, Fuentealba Sudy CA. [Prospective study and comparative of surgical and oncologic outcome between laparoscopic and retropubical radical prostatectomy]. Actas Urol Esp. 2009 Feb;33(2):167-71. doi: 10.1016/s0210-4806(09)74118-x. Spanish.
PMID: 19418841BACKGROUNDDrouin SJ, Vaessen C, Hupertan V, Comperat E, Misrai V, Haertig A, Bitker MO, Chartier-Kastler E, Richard F, Roupret M. Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. World J Urol. 2009 Oct;27(5):599-605. doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0379-z. Epub 2009 May 7.
PMID: 19421755BACKGROUNDFicarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S, D'Elia C, Secco S, Iafrate M, Cavalleri S, Artibani W. A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int. 2009 Aug;104(4):534-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08419.x. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
PMID: 19281468BACKGROUNDRemzi M, Klingler HC, Tinzl MV, Fong YK, Lodde M, Kiss B, Marberger M. Morbidity of laparoscopic extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy verus open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2005 Jul;48(1):83-9; discussion 89. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.026. Epub 2005 Apr 12.
PMID: 15967256BACKGROUNDOu YC, Yang CR, Wang J, Cheng CL, Patel VR. Comparison of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy performed by a single surgeon. Anticancer Res. 2009 May;29(5):1637-42.
PMID: 19443379BACKGROUNDBatagello CA, Vicentini FC, Monga M, Miller AW, Marchini GS, Torricelli FCM, Danilovic A, Coelho RF, Srougi M, Nahas WC, Mazzucchi E. Tranexamic acid in patients with complex stones undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. BJU Int. 2022 Jan;129(1):35-47. doi: 10.1111/bju.15378. Epub 2021 Jun 13.
PMID: 33630393BACKGROUNDCrescenti A, Borghi G, Bignami E, Bertarelli G, Landoni G, Casiraghi GM, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Rigatti P, Zangrillo A. Intraoperative use of tranexamic acid to reduce transfusion rate in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy: double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial. BMJ. 2011 Oct 19;343:d5701. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5701.
PMID: 22012809BACKGROUNDBalik M, Kosina J, Husek P, Brodak M, Cecka F. Safety and Efficacy of Using Tranexamic Acid at the Beginning of Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in a Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Pilot Study. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2020;63(4):176-182. doi: 10.14712/18059694.2020.60.
PMID: 33355078BACKGROUNDSaravanan R, Venkatraman R, Karthik K, Pushparani A. [Efficacy of different doses and timing of tranexamic acid in major orthopedic surgeries: a randomized trial]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020 Jul-Aug;70(4):311-317. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2020.03.013. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
PMID: 32753113BACKGROUNDClavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.
PMID: 19638912BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rafael Ferreira Coelho, MD, PhD
Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Just ICESP's Clinical Research Pharmacy team will be not blinded. The surgical and anesthetic teams will be blinded in relation to the placebo or tranexamic acid intervention during the preoperative period and during the postoperative follow-up and, if any case loses the blinding, it will be excluded from the analysis. The preparation of packaging, dilution and dispensing or the material containing tranexamic acid or placebo will be carried out by the ICESP's Clinical Research Pharmacy division.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 22, 2022
First Posted
April 18, 2023
Study Start
April 1, 2023
Primary Completion
April 1, 2024
Study Completion
September 1, 2024
Last Updated
April 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share