BeEAM Versus CEM in Lymphoma Patients as a Conditioning Regimen Before Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
BeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) Versus CEM (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan) in Lymphoma Patients as a Conditioning Regimen Before Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The proposed research aims to compare between BeEAM standard regimen and CEM as conditioning regimen in lymphoma patients in safety profile\& toxicity, infections (Febrile neutropenia) during transplant, time to engraftment (recovery not neutropenic), Length of stay at hospital, time to relapse, and other complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable lymphoma
Started Nov 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable lymphoma
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 11, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 14, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2023
CompletedSeptember 5, 2024
September 1, 2024
1.1 years
March 16, 2023
September 1, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of Side Effects.
Side effects of treatment
3 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Concentration of CD34+
Three Months
Study Arms (2)
BeEAM Regimen
ACTIVE COMPARATORBeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan)
CEM Regimen
ACTIVE COMPARATORCEM (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan)
Interventions
BeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan)
CEM (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. Patients with lymphoma relapsed/refractory (RR) Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with all subtypes. 2. Treat with conventional dose salvage regimens 3. Remission status before HSCT is complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR).
You may not qualify if:
- Remission status before HSCT is non remission (NR) or progressive disease (PD).
- CD34+ count cells \<2 Ă—106 CD34+ cells/kg BW
- CNS lymphoma or solid tumor not included in population.
- Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
- Any Psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical factor that interfere with patient adherence to medications.
- History of allergy to any medications in both protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Rehab Weridalead
Study Sites (1)
International Medical Center (IMC) Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Cairo, Egypt
Related Publications (3)
Velasquez WS, Cabanillas F, Salvador P, McLaughlin P, Fridrik M, Tucker S, Jagannath S, Hagemeister FB, Redman JR, Swan F, et al. Effective salvage therapy for lymphoma with cisplatin in combination with high-dose Ara-C and dexamethasone (DHAP). Blood. 1988 Jan;71(1):117-22.
PMID: 3334893RESULTFrankiewicz A, Sadus-Wojciechowska M, Najda J, Czerw T, Mendrek W, Sobczyk-Kruszelnicka M, Soska K, Ociepa M, Holowiecki J, Giebel S. Comparable safety profile of BeEAM (bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) and BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan) as conditioning before autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2018;22(2):113-117. doi: 10.5114/wo.2018.77046. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
PMID: 30150889RESULTEltelbanei MA, El-Bassiouny NA, Abdalla MS, Khalaf M, Werida RH. Clinical and safety outcomes of BeEAM (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan) versus CEM (Carboplatin, Etoposide, Melphalan) in lymphoma patients as a conditioning regimen before autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. BMC Cancer. 2024 Aug 13;24(1):1002. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12694-9.
PMID: 39134959DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Noha A. El bassiouny, Lecturer
Damanhour University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mohamed Khalef, Ph.D
Maady Military Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mahmoud Abdallah, Ph.D.
International Medical Center (IMC) Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2023
First Posted
April 14, 2023
Study Start
November 11, 2022
Primary Completion
December 30, 2023
Study Completion
December 30, 2023
Last Updated
September 5, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share