NCT05805449

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical effectiveness of augmenting surgical repair of complex anal fistula using autologous PRP and/or micronized acellular porcine urinary bladder matrix (UBM) to usual surgical care alone to prevent fistula recurrence or improve HRQoL, to compare the effects of augmenting surgical repair of complex anal fistula using autologous PRP and/or micronized acellular porcine urinary bladder matrix on early postoperative pain and fecal continence and to assess the cost utility of augmented complex fistula repair relative to usual surgical care

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
250

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 21, 2023

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 16, 2023

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 10, 2023

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

April 10, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

March 16, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 5, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of participants with fistula recurrence

    A fistula recurrence is defined as one or more of the following clinical signs or symptoms after repair: recurrent abscess at the site of repair, chronic drainage or passage of flatus from an external opening of the perineum away from the anal verge, a non-healing external opening that tracks toward anus by probing with fistula probe.

    upto 6 months after surgery

  • Change in Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as assessed by the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire

    This instrument queries subjects on health status related to mobility, self-care, 'usual' activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression with 5 potential responses ranging from "no problems" to inability to complete the task or extreme levels of pain/depression, correlating to a discrete index score from 1-5, a higher number indicating a worse outcome.The instrument also includes an overall VAS self-rating of health ranging from 0-100, higher number indicating better health.

    Baseline, 1week post surgery, 2 weeks post surgery, 6 weeks post surgery, 3 months post surgery, 6 months post surgery, and 12 months post surgery.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Number of participants who have post operative pain as assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS)

    14 days after surgery

  • Change in fecal continence as assessed by the Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence (CCFI) scoring tool

    Baseline, 2 weeks after surgery,6 weeks after surgery,3 months after surgery,6 months after surgery and 12 months after surgery

  • The relative cost utility of the different treatment strategies as assessed by a questionnaire

    12 months after surgery

Study Arms (4)

Surgery

SHAM COMPARATOR

Control patients will receive usual standard of care surgical repair of their complex fistula by The ligation of intersphincteric tract (LIFT) or advancement flap technique without any biologic adjunct.

Procedure: Surgery

Surgery plus platelet-rich plasma (PRP)

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: SurgeryOther: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP)

Surgery plus matrix

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: SurgeryDevice: Matrix

Surgery plus PRP plus matrix material

EXPERIMENTAL
Procedure: SurgeryOther: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP)Device: Matrix

Interventions

SurgeryPROCEDURE

Control patients will receive usual standard of care surgical repair of their complex fistula by LIFT or advancement flap technique without any biologic adjunct.

SurgerySurgery plus PRP plus matrix materialSurgery plus matrixSurgery plus platelet-rich plasma (PRP)

Participants will have 40-50cc of peripheral whole blood drawn into a syringe pre-loaded with acid citrate dextrose (ACD) anticoagulant and concentrated PRP harvested by double centrifugation technique using the manufacturer's kit and benchtop centrifuge. This typically yields 5-8cc of PRP that is 18-times more concentrated than baseline.

Surgery plus PRP plus matrix materialSurgery plus platelet-rich plasma (PRP)
MatrixDEVICE

Participants will receive 200g of "paste" matrix and 200g injected at the following sites: the internal opening closure site at level of the sphincter muscle, within the walls of the fistula tract along its length, and within the tissue of an advancement flap particularly at areas of tissue apposition.

Surgery plus PRP plus matrix materialSurgery plus matrix

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • complex cryptoglandular transsphincteric anal fistula undergoing surgical repair by LIFT or advancement flap procedure
  • English or Spanish speaking and capable of providing informed consent
  • Willing to undergo temporary anal seton drainage for requisite time prior to repair
  • Participating surgeons will only be eligible if they perform at least 3 repair procedures/year

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to reliably complete follow up for 12 months postoperatively
  • Primary platelet disorders
  • Thrombocytopenia \< 150 plt/microliter
  • Inability to stop anti-platelet agent \> 5 days preoperatively
  • Fistula associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), malignancy or pelvic/perineal radiation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rectal Fistula

Interventions

Surgical Procedures, Operative

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal FistulaDigestive System FistulaDigestive System DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesRectal DiseasesFistulaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Jeffrey L Van Eps, MD

    The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2023

First Posted

April 10, 2023

Study Start

February 21, 2023

Primary Completion

February 28, 2026

Study Completion

March 31, 2026

Last Updated

April 10, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations