PEP and OPEP Devices in Cystic Fibrosis
Evaluation of the Short-term Use of Selected PEP and OPEP Devices in Cystic Fibrosis Patients During an Exacerbation of the Disease
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common severe autosomal recessive genetic disease in Caucasians. The CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator) gene, which encodes the chloride channel of the epithelial cell membrane, is responsible for the development of the disease. Respiratory physiotherapy, especially bronchial drainage is one of the basic elements of comprehensive management in patients with CF. Among the many procedures used in CF drainage physiotherapy, the most commonly include these using positive expiratory pressure (PEP) and oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP). The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of the usage of selected PEP and OPEP devices in bronchial drainage in cystic fibrosis patients during exacerbation of the disease.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 15, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2025
CompletedApril 6, 2023
March 1, 2023
3.4 years
February 15, 2023
March 24, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Pulmonary Function. Measured indicators: FEV1, FVC
Volume measurement (L). Change from baseline to day 4
Baseline and the day 4
Pulmonary Function. Measured indicators: FEF75
Volume and flow measurement (L/s). Change from baseline to day 4
Baseline and the day 4
Sputum expectorated
Volume measurement (ml)
from the 1st to the 4th day
Study Arms (3)
Aerobika OPEP Therapy
EXPERIMENTALBronchial drainage session with the Aerobika OPEP device consist of breathing through the device for 15 breaths in one cycle, and taking a few (3-5) relaxed exhalations in accordance with the forced exhalation technique. This cycle is repeated at least three times. The maximum number of cycles is five considering the need. The size of the applied expiratory resistance is selected individually. The pressure is 5 - 20 cm H2O and the oscillation frequency is up to about 15 Hz. Duration of the session: 10 - 20 min. Duration of the program: 4 days. Frequency: twice a day.
Flutter O-PEP Therapy
EXPERIMENTALBronchial drainage session with the Flutter O-PEP device consist of breathing through the device for 15 breaths in one cycle, and taking a few (3-5) relaxed exhalations in accordance with the forced exhalation technique. This cycle is repeated at least three times. The maximum number of cycles is five considering the need. The size of the applied expiratory resistance is selected individually. The pressure is 5 - 20 cm H2O and the oscillation frequency is up to about 15 Hz. Duration of the session: 10 - 20 min. Duration of the program: 4 days. Frequency: twice a day.
PEP Therapy
EXPERIMENTALBronchial drainage session with the PEP device consist of breathing through the device for 15 breaths in one cycle, and taking a few (3-5) relaxed exhalations in accordance with the forced exhalation technique. This cycle is repeated at least three times. The maximum number of cycles is five considering the need. The size of the applied expiratory resistance is selected individually. The pressure is 10-20 cmH2O during exhalation. Duration of the session: 10 - 20 min. Duration of the program: 4 days. Frequency: twice a day.
Interventions
The 4-day physiotherapy program consists of performing bronchial drainage using one of the three devices: Aerobika\* OPEP Device (Trudell Medical International), Flutter - PARI O-PEP Device (PARI Respiratory Equipment, Inc.) and PEP - PARI PEP® S System (PARI Respiratory Equipment, Inc.).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- written consent of the patient and/or guardian, age over 12, no disease complications (within the last 2 months) in the form of: active haemoptysis, pneumothorax, chest surgeries, surgical procedures in the area of the esophagus (esophageal varices), otitis media,
- the ability to perform correctly lung function tests and FEV1 value above 20% predicted,
- the presence of respiratory symptoms indicating exacerbation of the disease, i.e. increasing of cough, increasing of dyspnoea, decrease in FEV1 by 10% or more from a previously recorded value.
You may not qualify if:
- lack of written consent of the patient and/or guardian, age below 12, occurrence of disease complications (within the last 2 months) in the form of: active hemoptysis, pneumothorax, chest surgeries, surgical procedures in the area of the esophagus (esophageal varices), otitis media,
- inability to perform lung function tests, FEV1 value below 20% of predicted value,
- PEP, OPEP device intolerance,
- no symptoms of the respiratory system indicating exacerbation of the disease, i.e. increasing of cough, increasing of dyspnoea, decrease in in FEV1 less than 10% from a previously recorded value.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases Research Institute
Rabka-Zdrój, Małopolska, 34-700, Poland
Related Publications (12)
Braggion C, Cappelletti LM, Cornacchia M, Zanolla L, Mastella G. Short-term effects of three chest physiotherapy regimens in patients hospitalized for pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis: a cross-over randomized study. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1995 Jan;19(1):16-22. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950190104.
PMID: 7675553BACKGROUNDDavies G, Rowbotham NJ, Smith S, Elliot ZC, Gathercole K, Rayner O, Leighton PA, Herbert S, Duff AJ, Chandran S, Daniels T, Nash EF, Smyth AR. Characterising burden of treatment in cystic fibrosis to identify priority areas for clinical trials. J Cyst Fibros. 2020 May;19(3):499-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.10.025. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
PMID: 31735561RESULTMorrison L, Innes S. Oscillating devices for airway clearance in people with cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 4;5(5):CD006842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006842.pub4.
PMID: 28471492RESULTLannefors L, Wollmer P. Mucus clearance with three chest physiotherapy regimes in cystic fibrosis: a comparison between postural drainage, PEP and physical exercise. Eur Respir J. 1992 Jun;5(6):748-53.
PMID: 1628733RESULTFranks LJ, Walsh JR, Hall K, Jacuinde G, Yerkovich S, Morris NR. Comparing the Performance Characteristics of Different Positive Expiratory Pressure Devices. Respir Care. 2019 Apr;64(4):434-444. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06410. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
PMID: 30670668RESULTVan Fleet H, Dunn DK, McNinch NL, Volsko TA. Evaluation of Functional Characteristics of 4 Oscillatory Positive Pressure Devices in a Simulated Cystic Fibrosis Model. Respir Care. 2017 Apr;62(4):451-458. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04570. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
PMID: 28292973RESULTThanh NX, Jacobs P, Suggett J, McIvor A, Kaplan A. Cost-Effectiveness of the Aerobika(R) Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure Device in the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations in Canada. Can Respir J. 2019 Jan 10;2019:9176504. doi: 10.1155/2019/9176504. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 30774739RESULTLeemans G, Belmans D, Van Holsbeke C, Kushnarev V, Sugget J, Ides K, Vissers D, De Backer W. A Functional Respiratory Imaging Approach to the Effect of an Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure Device in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Jun 4;15:1261-1268. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S242191. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32581531RESULTOrlik T, Sands D. [Long-term evaluation of effectiveness for selected chest physiotherapy methods used in the treatment of cystic fibrosis]. Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2001 Jul-Sep;5(3):245-57. Polish.
PMID: 12004158RESULTScherer TA, Barandun J, Martinez E, Wanner A, Rubin EM. Effect of high-frequency oral airway and chest wall oscillation and conventional chest physical therapy on expectoration in patients with stable cystic fibrosis. Chest. 1998 Apr;113(4):1019-27. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.4.1019.
PMID: 9554641RESULTPryor JA, Webber BA, Hodson ME, Warner JO. The Flutter VRP1 as an adjunct to chest physiotherapy in cystic fibrosis. Respir Med. 1994 Oct;88(9):677-81. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(05)80066-6.
PMID: 7809441RESULTChatham K, Ionescu AA, Nixon LS, Shale DJ. A short-term comparison of two methods of sputum expectoration in cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2004 Mar;23(3):435-9. doi: 10.1183/09031936.04.00084904.
PMID: 15065835RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jarosław Prusak
National Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases Research Institute
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 15, 2023
First Posted
April 6, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion
June 1, 2023
Study Completion
February 28, 2025
Last Updated
April 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03