Physical Therapy Students' Reflective Thinking With Narrative Photography in Heart Transplantation
1 other identifier
interventional
117
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Physical therapy students must learn about heart transplantation, and must be able to communicate with patients using empathy and moral sensitivity. The aim of the study is to compare the narrative photography (NP) and traditional learning (TL) methods applied to heart transplantation physical therapy, as they relate to physical therapy students' knowledge, empathy, satisfaction, and moral sensitivity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 11, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2023
CompletedApril 6, 2023
March 1, 2023
10 months
March 11, 2023
March 23, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Knowledge of physical therapy in heart transplantation
Knowledge of physical therapy in heart transplantation was measured using an ad-hoc multiple-choice questionnaire. To avoid any test preparation, students were not informed that there would be knowledge tests. The tests included 10 multiple-choice questions that assessed physical therapy knowledge of heart transplantation-related issues-this included rate of perceived exertion, cardiopulmonary exercise test, cardiac rehabilitation, symptoms, and signs. The minimum and maximum values were 0 and 10, respectively. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Baseline
Knowledge of physical therapy in heart transplantation
Knowledge of physical therapy in heart transplantation was measured using an ad-hoc multiple-choice questionnaire. To avoid any test preparation, students were not informed that there would be knowledge tests. The tests included 10 multiple-choice questions that assessed physical therapy knowledge of heart transplantation-related issues-this included rate of perceived exertion, cardiopulmonary exercise test, cardiac rehabilitation, symptoms, and signs. The minimum and maximum values were 0 and 10, respectively. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
After the intervention (2 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Empathy using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index
Baseline
Empathy using the Interpersonal Reactivity Index
After the intervention (2 weeks)
Moral sensitivity with the Revised Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire
Baseline
Moral sensitivity with the Revised Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire
After the intervention (2 weeks)
Satisfaction questionnaire
After the intervention (2 weeks)
Study Arms (2)
Narrative photography group
EXPERIMENTALStudents in the NP group performed training activities on empathy and care for patients undergoing heart transplantation.
Traditional learning group
ACTIVE COMPARATORStudents in the TL group performed a conventional intervention without real patients.
Interventions
Students were shown real-life written stories, audio, and videos using a private online platform. The training activity included four modules: i) heart transplantation waiting list; ii) life expectancy, fear of death, and organ rejection; iii) post-transplant physical and functional limitations; and iv) lack of knowledge of physical exercise patients can perform. The students were encouraged to think about how they would feel if they had undergone heart transplantation. Afterward, they had to communicate these feelings using up to three photographs and reflective explanatory text. Two weeks later, the students met a heart transplantation expert patient followed by an educator-guided debate. Students' images were shared and discussed. Moreover, students were encouraged to explain their feelings and their acquired skills (two hours).
A participatory lecture was carried out, in which cardiac rehabilitation in heart transplantation patients was explained. Then, there was an educator-guided debate about protocols and actions (one hour). Second, the students autonomously prepared clinical cases on physical limitations, physical exercise, risk factors, and life after transplantation (two hours). Two weeks later, the clinical session was held among students (2 hours). They adopted the roles of physical therapists or transplant patients to work on: i) post-transplant physical and functional limitations; ii) lack of knowledge of the physical exercise the patient can perform; iii) control of cardiovascular risk factors; iv) life post-transplant.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Third-year physical therapy students who were studying the heart transplantation physical therapy course in a Physical therapy Degree.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Valencia
Valencia, 46010, Spain
Related Publications (2)
Leyva-Moral JM, Aguayo-Gonzalez M, Folch C, San Rafael S, Gomez-Ibanez R. Nursing students' perceptions of the efficacy of narrative photography as a learning method: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Health Sci. 2022 Jun;24(2):380-386. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12932. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
PMID: 35199453BACKGROUNDLeyva-Moral JM, Gomez-Ibanez R, San Rafael S, Guevara-Vasquez G, Aguayo-Gonzalez M. Nursing students' satisfaction with narrative photography as a method to develop empathy towards people with Hiv: A mixed-design study. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jan;96:104646. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104646. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
PMID: 33160157BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Elena Marqués Sulé, PhD
Univeristy of Valencia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The outcomes assessor was blinded to group allocation. A blinded assessor collected all baseline and post-intervention measures and entered the data.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 11, 2023
First Posted
April 6, 2023
Study Start
September 1, 2021
Primary Completion
June 30, 2022
Study Completion
June 30, 2022
Last Updated
April 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share