The Effectiveness of Using Empathy Courses to Guide OT Students in Case-base Clinical Reasoning
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Clinical reasoning is an important cognitive process in medical decision making. In recent years, medical education advocates holistic medicine, but systematic learning is rare in school education.Therefore, this study used an empathy experience course to conduct a case-oriented clinical reasoning training course to improve the empathy and clinical reasoning skills of pre-clinical students in occupational therapy through four sessions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 21, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2023
CompletedJuly 29, 2022
June 1, 2022
1.3 years
June 21, 2022
July 28, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Chinese version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Health Profession Students
A total of 20 questions were used to self-assess participants' empathy status and were scored using a 7-point Likert scale. The content covered three sections, including 10 questions on the perspective taking section, 8 questions on the compassionate care section, and 2 questions on standing in the patient's shoes.
Change from Baseline at 2 weeks
The Self-Assessment of Clinical Reflection and Reasoning
A 26-item, five-point Likert scale was used to self-assess clinical reasoning skills, including strongly disagree, disagree, unsure, agree, and strongly agree.
Change from Baseline at 2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Satisfaction Questionnaire
up to 2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Experimental group
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group was given four 3-hour training sessions over 2 weeks, which included group instruction on empathy experience, clinical reasoning, and functional therapy case-oriented learning.
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe control group was given case studies(text).
Interventions
Four 3-hour training sessions over 2 weeks, which included group instruction on empathy experience, clinical reasoning, and functional therapy case-oriented learning.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Occupational therapy students from National Taiwan University, Kaohsiung Medical University, Sun Yat-sen Medical University, National Cheng Kung University, Chang Gung University, IShou University, Fu Jen Catholic University, and Asia University who have completed their major credits and will be interning in a clinical hospital.
- Must be at least 20 years old and under 65 years old.
You may not qualify if:
- Those who are unable to attend the whole course.
- Those who have not completed their school credits and are unable to go to the clinical hospital for internship.
- Those who do not speak Chinese or English as their native language.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
New Taipei City, Taiwan
Related Publications (11)
Addy TM, Hafler J, Galerneau F. Faculty Development for Fostering Clinical Reasoning Skills in Early Medical Students Using a Modified Bayesian Approach. Teach Learn Med. 2016 Oct-Dec;28(4):415-423. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1186551. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
PMID: 27283028BACKGROUNDCooper N, Bartlett M, Gay S, Hammond A, Lillicrap M, Matthan J, Singh M; UK Clinical Reasoning in Medical Education (CReME) consensus statement group. Consensus statement on the content of clinical reasoning curricula in undergraduate medical education. Med Teach. 2021 Feb;43(2):152-159. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1842343. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
PMID: 33205693BACKGROUNDDaniel M, Rencic J, Durning SJ, Holmboe E, Santen SA, Lang V, Ratcliffe T, Gordon D, Heist B, Lubarsky S, Estrada CA, Ballard T, Artino AR Jr, Sergio Da Silva A, Cleary T, Stojan J, Gruppen LD. Clinical Reasoning Assessment Methods: A Scoping Review and Practical Guidance. Acad Med. 2019 Jun;94(6):902-912. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002618.
PMID: 30720527BACKGROUNDDuca NS, Glod S. Bridging the Gap Between the Classroom and the Clerkship: A Clinical Reasoning Curriculum for Third-Year Medical Students. MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Jan 25;15:10800. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10800.
PMID: 31139730BACKGROUNDHuhn K, Gilliland SJ, Black LL, Wainwright SF, Christensen N. Clinical Reasoning in Physical Therapy: A Concept Analysis. Phys Ther. 2019 Apr 1;99(4):440-456. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy148.
PMID: 30496522BACKGROUNDJamieson M, Krupa T, O'Riordan A, O'Connor D, Paterson M, Ball C, Wilcox S. Developing empathy as a foundation of client-centred practice: evaluation of a university curriculum initiative. Can J Occup Ther. 2006 Apr;73(2):76-85. doi: 10.2182/cjot.05.0008.
PMID: 16680911BACKGROUNDMin Simpkins AA, Koch B, Spear-Ellinwood K, St John P. A developmental assessment of clinical reasoning in preclinical medical education. Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1591257. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1591257.
PMID: 30935299BACKGROUNDPosel N, Mcgee JB, Fleiszer DM. Twelve tips to support the development of clinical reasoning skills using virtual patient cases. Med Teach. 2015;37(9):813-8. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.993951. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
PMID: 25523009BACKGROUNDSvalastog AL, Donev D, Jahren Kristoffersen N, Gajovic S. Concepts and definitions of health and health-related values in the knowledge landscapes of the digital society. Croat Med J. 2017 Dec 31;58(6):431-435. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2017.58.431. No abstract available.
PMID: 29308835BACKGROUNDTen Cate O. Competency-Based Postgraduate Medical Education: Past, Present and Future. GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Nov 15;34(5):Doc69. doi: 10.3205/zma001146. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 29226237BACKGROUNDWenham J, Best M, Kissane DW. Systematic review of medical education on spirituality. Intern Med J. 2021 Nov;51(11):1781-1790. doi: 10.1111/imj.15421.
PMID: 34142417BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hanyun Hsiao
Taipei Medical University, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 21, 2022
First Posted
July 29, 2022
Study Start
August 1, 2022
Primary Completion
November 30, 2023
Study Completion
November 30, 2023
Last Updated
July 29, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share