Reciprocal Electrical Stimulation Versus Kinesio Taping

NCT05799703 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: EG, KFS lab Research 6
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 68
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This study will be conducted to:

1. 1.evaluate the effect of kinesio taping on hand functions in hemiplegic cerebral palsy children
2. 2.compare between the effects of reciprocal electrical stimulation and kinesio taping on hand functions in hemiplegic cerebral palsy children.

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy

Keywords

kinesio taping; reciprocal electrical stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Fine motor skills

  we will use Peabody developmental motor scale-2 to assess fine motor skills

  3 months

Study Arms (2)

Group (A)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

will receive RES in addition to the traditional exercise program.

Device: electrical stimulation device

Group (B)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

will receive KT in addition to the traditional exercise program.

Other: kinesio taping

Interventions

electrical stimulation device DEVICE

the device has 2 channels ,4 electrodes with multiple ems programs

Group (A)

kinesio taping OTHER

kinesio tape a therapeutic tape that's applied strategically to the body to provide support, lessen pain, reduce swelling, and improve performance

Group (B)

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 4 Years - 6 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Child (0-17)

You may qualify if:

• A medical diagnosis of spastic hemiplegic CP made by paediatricians or pediatric neurologists.
• Children with spasticity grades ranged from 1 to 1+ according to MAS.
• Their age range from 4 to 6 years.
• Children who can sit on the chair with good balance and recognize and follow verbal orders and commands included in both testing and training techniques

You may not qualify if:

• They had a permanent deformity (bony or soft tissue contractures).
• Children having visual or auditory defects.
• Children with intelligence quotient less than 70.
• Children who had Botox application to the upper extremity in the past 6 months or had undergone a previous surgical intervention to wrist and hand.
• A history of epileptic seizure and any diagnosed cardiac or orthopaedic disability that may prevent the use of assessment methods.
• Children who are absent in two taping change sessions

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Basma Elsaid Mahmoud Bakr: lead

Study Sites (1)

Physical Therapy

Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Damage, Chronic; Brain Diseases; Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: DOUBLE
• Who Masked: INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Effect Of Reciprocal Electrical Stimulation Versus Kinesio Taping On Hand Functions In Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy Children

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: March 3, 2023
• First Posted: April 5, 2023
• Study Start: February 15, 2023
• Primary Completion: October 15, 2023
• Study Completion: October 30, 2023
• Last Updated: March 12, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Locations

EG (1)