NCT05796063

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research is to determine if gastric point of care ultrasound (G-POCUS) can be used to help clinicians determine when to feed patients or when to insert or remove nasogastric tubes for patients recovering from colorectal or abdominal surgery. Patients enrolled in the intervention group will have G-POCUS exams performed after surgery. The results of the exams will be used to make clinical decisions. Researchers will compare these patients to patients receiving the usual care in the hospital after surgery.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
128

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 7, 2023

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2023

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 3, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

April 7, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

March 7, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 6, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

gastric ultrasounddelayed bowel functionpostoperative ileus

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Utility of G-POCUS as a clinical decision-making tool - diet advancement

    Patients enrolled in the intervention arm will have G-POCUS exams performed. A previously validated algorithm will be used to determine if their stomach is full or empty. Based on this result, decisions by the clinical team will be made regarding the patients' diet, need for nasogastric decompression using a standardized algorithm.

    post-operative day 1 until day of discharge from the hospital for patients in the intervention group

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Utility of G-POCUS as a clinical decision-making tool - quality of care metrics

    post-operative day 1 until day of discharge

Study Arms (2)

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

On postoperative day one, patients will be asked if they are having any GI symptoms. These are defined as presence of nausea, emesis, belching, and/or hiccups. In the intervention arm, clinicians will use the results of G-POCUS and presence/absence of GI symptoms to inform decision making according to one of two standardized algorithms.

Diagnostic Test: gastric point of care ultrasound

Control

NO INTERVENTION

On postoperative day one, patients will be asked if they are having any GI symptoms. These are defined as presence of nausea, emesis, belching, and/or hiccups. In the control arm, presence of GI symptoms will be assessed, and once of two standardized algorithms which are representative of the current standard of care for postoperative diet management.

Interventions

Patients will receive a gastric point of care ultrasound to evaluate for delayed gastric emptying. Gastric POCUS studies will be obtained using Kosmos, a handheld portable ultrasound that is FDA approved for clinical use. This product has already been validated for use, and this is not a novel application of the technology.

Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Completed signed and dated informed consent form
  • Willing to comply with all study procedures
  • Male or female, 18 years of age or older
  • Presenting for a schedule elective colorectal/abdominal surgery, either open, robotic, or laparoscopic

You may not qualify if:

  • History of gastroparesis or known gastric/intestinal motility disorder
  • History of gastric/bariatric surgery
  • Intubated/sedated postoperatively
  • Presence of open abdominal wounds (including abdominal wound vac)
  • Patients who received a complex abdominal wall reconstruction
  • Class III/IV Wound (Contaminated/Infected/Dirty)
  • Surgery was emergent/urgent/unscheduled
  • NGT placed or present at time of operation
  • Presence of ileostomy/colostomy
  • J-pouch reconstruction patients
  • Currently pregnant patients
  • Patients aged \<18 years old

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (18)

  • Asgeirsson T, El-Badawi KI, Mahmood A, Barletta J, Luchtefeld M, Senagore AJ. Postoperative ileus: it costs more than you expect. J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Feb;210(2):228-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.09.028. Epub 2009 Nov 18.

    PMID: 20113944BACKGROUND
  • Bragg D, El-Sharkawy AM, Psaltis E, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Lobo DN. Postoperative ileus: Recent developments in pathophysiology and management. Clin Nutr. 2015 Jun;34(3):367-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.01.016. Epub 2015 Jan 31.

    PMID: 25819420BACKGROUND
  • Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Nygren J; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Study Group. Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg. 2011 May;146(5):571-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.309. Epub 2011 Jan 17.

    PMID: 21242424BACKGROUND
  • Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, Nygren J, Demartines N, Francis N, Rockall TA, Young-Fadok TM, Hill AG, Soop M, de Boer HD, Urman RD, Chang GJ, Fichera A, Kessler H, Grass F, Whang EE, Fawcett WJ, Carli F, Lobo DN, Rollins KE, Balfour A, Baldini G, Riedel B, Ljungqvist O. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):659-695. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y.

    PMID: 30426190BACKGROUND
  • Haskins SC, Kruisselbrink R, Boublik J, Wu CL, Perlas A. Gastric Ultrasound for the Regional Anesthesiologist and Pain Specialist. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Oct;43(7):689-698. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000846.

    PMID: 30052550BACKGROUND
  • Heinberg EM, Finan MA, Chambers RB, Bazzett LB, Kline RC. Postoperative ileus on a gynecologic oncology service--do abdominal X-rays have a role? Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Jul;90(1):158-62. doi: 10.1016/s0090-8258(03)00247-6.

    PMID: 12821357BACKGROUND
  • Lamm R, Collins M, Bloom J, Joel M, Iosif L, Park D, Reny J, Schultz S, Yeo CJ, Beausang D, Schwenk ES, Costanzo C, Phillips BR. Postoperative Handheld Gastric Point-of-Care Ultrasound and Delayed Bowel Function. J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Apr 1;236(4):554-559. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000536. Epub 2023 Jan 5.

    PMID: 36602237BACKGROUND
  • Lamm R, Bloom J, Collins M, Goldman D, Beausang D, Costanzo C, Schwenk ES, Phillips B. A Role for Gastric Point of Care Ultrasound in Postoperative Delayed Gastrointestinal Functioning. J Surg Res. 2022 Aug;276:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.028. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

    PMID: 35339785BACKGROUND
  • Lamm R, Collins M, Bloom J, Joel M, Iosif L, Park D, Reny J, Schultz S, Phillips B, Schwenk E, Costanzo C. Novice User Learning Curve for Handheld Gastric Point of Care Ultrasound Evaluations to Detect Delayed Return of Postoperative Peristalsis. Am Surg. 2023 Dec;89(12):6290-6292. doi: 10.1177/00031348231156770. Epub 2023 Feb 14. No abstract available.

    PMID: 36787243BACKGROUND
  • Mirbagheri N, Dunn G, Naganathan V, Suen M, Gladman MA. Normal Values and Clinical Use of Bedside Sonographic Assessment of Postoperative Gastric Emptying: A Prospective Cohort Study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Aug;59(8):758-65. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000637.

    PMID: 27384094BACKGROUND
  • Nielsen S, Degenhardt L, Hoban B, Gisev N. A synthesis of oral morphine equivalents (OME) for opioid utilisation studies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Jun;25(6):733-7. doi: 10.1002/pds.3945. Epub 2015 Dec 22.

    PMID: 26693665BACKGROUND
  • Scarborough JE, Schumacher J, Kent KC, Heise CP, Greenberg CC. Associations of Specific Postoperative Complications With Outcomes After Elective Colon Resection: A Procedure-Targeted Approach Toward Surgical Quality Improvement. JAMA Surg. 2017 Feb 15;152(2):e164681. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4681. Epub 2017 Feb 15.

    PMID: 27926773BACKGROUND
  • Schwenk ES, Grant AE, Torjman MC, McNulty SE, Baratta JL, Viscusi ER. The Efficacy of Peripheral Opioid Antagonists in Opioid-Induced Constipation and Postoperative Ileus: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):767-777. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000671.

    PMID: 29016552BACKGROUND
  • Sommer NP, Schneider R, Wehner S, Kalff JC, Vilz TO. State-of-the-art colorectal disease: postoperative ileus. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Sep;36(9):2017-2025. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03939-1. Epub 2021 May 11.

    PMID: 33977334BACKGROUND
  • Van de Putte P, Perlas A. Ultrasound assessment of gastric content and volume. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jul;113(1):12-22. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu151. Epub 2014 Jun 3.

    PMID: 24893784BACKGROUND
  • Vather R, Trivedi S, Bissett I. Defining postoperative ileus: results of a systematic review and global survey. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 May;17(5):962-72. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2148-y. Epub 2013 Feb 2.

    PMID: 23377782BACKGROUND
  • Wu Z, Boersema GS, Dereci A, Menon AG, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Clinical endpoint, early detection, and differential diagnosis of postoperative ileus: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Surg Res. 2015;54(3-4):127-38. doi: 10.1159/000369529. Epub 2014 Dec 10.

    PMID: 25503902BACKGROUND
  • Zhang X, Zheng W, Chen C, Kang X, Zheng Y, Bao F, Gan S, Zhu S. Goal-directed fluid therapy does not reduce postoperative ileus in gastrointestinal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(45):e13097. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013097.

    PMID: 30407319BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNauseaSigns and Symptoms, DigestiveSigns and SymptomsVomiting

Study Officials

  • Benjamin Phillips, MD

    Thomas Jefferson University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Micaela L Collins, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2023

First Posted

April 3, 2023

Study Start

April 1, 2023

Primary Completion

April 30, 2024

Study Completion

September 30, 2024

Last Updated

April 7, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations